How would Christians rebut James Fodor's hallucinations argument?

Hallucinations??
One would have to really stretch it to say that the appearances of the Resurrected Christ were just hallucinations! Such a supposition does not lineup with the facts of the historical accounts. And those declared "spottings" by the Christians do not fit the definition of hallucination.

Notice !

• The sightings were not just one occurrence, but many. Jesus spent 40 days roaming up and down the country teaching about the Kingdom of God.
• The sightings happened at different locations throughout the country.
• The sightings were not just "sightings", but occasions of personal interaction! The conduct of Thomas touching and talking to Jesus empirically has special impact!
• The interaction with Jesus happened at different times of the day---not just some cloudy daytime where a cloud resembled the face of Jesus! Morning, noon, and night.
• The interaction occurred repeatedly among many people---and was just the testimony of one person.
• Jesus didn't just talk to people (in a hallucinagenic state), but even cooked breakfast for a group of men. The food was real, the event was real, and Jesus was real.
• Jesus prophecies given after the Resurrection came to pass, esp. the Baptism of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost. Hallucinations of a dead man don't have that power!
• Roman historical accounts, Jewish histories (Josephus), as well as several "Gospels" accounts by different authors attest to the Rising of Christ.
• Several skeptics unfriendly to Christ talk, were thoroughly convinced by this Resurrection. A hallucination would garner no such convincing.

Conclusion
It would not be too unkind to conclude that those denying the Resurrection with its historical---and empirical---verifications are themselves hallucinating and are in a logical brain fog.

.