GSMArena.com GSMArena.com
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • Merch
  • Coverage
  • Contact
GSMArena Team, 01 September 2025

The Ultra cameraphone comparison: Oppo vs Samsung vs Xiaomi vs Vivo vs Huawei

  • Comments (239)
  • Pura 80 Ultra
  • Find X8 Ultra

4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  1. 1. Intro, specs overview
  2. 2. Photos: Ultrawide to standard comparison (13-50mm), daylight
  3. 3. Photos: Telephoto comparison (70mm and up), daylight
  4. 4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  5. 5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  6. 6. Photos: Telephoto, low light
  7. 7. Video recording: Daylight
  8. 8. Video recording: Low light
  9. 9. Wrap-up
  10.  
  11. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5G specification
  12. Oppo Find X8 Ultra specification
  13. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra specification
  14. vivo X200 Ultra specification
  15. Xiaomi 15 Ultra specification
  16. Review comments (239)

Oppo Samsung Xiaomi vivo Huawei Android Camera comparison

Portraits comparison

We also shot a couple scenes of a portrait nature - at the zoom levels we figured made sense. Don't expect to see ultrawide people shots or 200+mm telephoto portraits. We also decided to leave the bokeh to the lenses and shoot in Photo mode - adding Portrait mode would have overcomplicated things, plus these cameras already have large enough sensors and bright enough optics to be doing pretty well on their own in terms of subject separation.

Obviously, the vivo is no good at 24mm for lack of a camera with that focal length. That excuse doesn't fly for the Galaxy, whose shots are simply not sharp enough, for one reason or another.

The other three are hard to split, but there are subtle differences - for example, the Xiaomi has a small, but still readily noticeable advantage in background blur that makes your subject stand out a little bit more. The Pura's exposures and the dynamic range have the best balance in our book.

“Portraits, Portraits, wide angle: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 125, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: vivo X200 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 300, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 500, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, wide angle: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (24mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

“Portraits, Portraits, wide angle: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/279s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 80, 1/1973s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: vivo X200 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 71, 1/193s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, wide angle: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/165s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, wide angle: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (24mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

At 35mm, it's the vivo that has an inherent advantage - or, rather, it should have an advantage, but it's not really showing in these scenes. We observed either a tendency to misfocus or a special type of facial processing (why not both) that resulted in soft areas on our subject. It's not something that was an issue at review time. The Galaxy remains hard to like at this level, the Huawei and the Xiaomi lose some detail, while the Oppo is still about as sharp as it was above if a little hazy.

Portraits, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (36mm) - f/2.0, ISO 64, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.8, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 125, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 194, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.6, ISO 400, 1/66s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, standard: Huawei (36mm) • Oppo (35mm) • Samsung (35mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (35mm)

Portraits, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (38mm) - f/2.0, ISO 50, 1/185s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/279s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 40, 1/1099s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 71, 1/225s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/154s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, standard: Huawei (38mm) • Oppo (35mm) • Samsung (35mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (35mm)

At 50mm (or thereabout), the Oppo has the upper hand, with the Xiaomi mostly keeping up. The vivo and the Huawei are doing alright, the Galaxy remains last in our book.

Portraits, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (48mm) - f/2.0, ISO 80, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (47mm) - f/1.8, ISO 500, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (46mm) - f/1.7, ISO 200, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.7, ISO 461, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.6, ISO 400, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, standard: Huawei (48mm) • Oppo (47mm) • Samsung (46mm) • vivo (50mm) • Xiaomi (50mm)

Portraits, standard: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (48mm) - f/2.0, ISO 50, 1/990s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (47mm) - f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/266s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (46mm) - f/1.7, ISO 40, 1/1493s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: vivo X200 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.7, ISO 71, 1/254s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, standard: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (50mm) - f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/154s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, standard: Huawei (48mm) • Oppo (47mm) • Samsung (46mm) • vivo (50mm) • Xiaomi (50mm)

At the short telephoto zoom level, there are three properly great phones and two not so good ones. The Samsung's meh results shouldn't be a surprise by now, while the Xiaomi's 70mm camera is merely okay. And then picking the best among the Huawei, Oppo, and vivo is no easy task. The Oppo's wider focal length can be an argument in its favor if you prefer 70mm over 85-ish, and the generally warmer colors could be your thing too. The Huawei and the vivo are more similar than different, but the vivo's colors are punchier and it's a bit more contrasty (both can be a good or a bad thing depending on where you stand).

Portraits, short tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (89mm) - f/2.4, ISO 200, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (70mm) - f/2.1, ISO 500, 1/57s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (69mm) - f/2.4, ISO 400, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: vivo X200 Ultra (85mm) - f/2.3, ISO 1033, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70mm) - f/1.8, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, short tele: Huawei (89mm) • Oppo (70mm) • Samsung (69mm) • vivo (85mm) • Xiaomi (70mm)

Portraits, short tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (89mm) - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/152s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (70mm) - f/2.1, ISO 100, 1/200s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (69mm) - f/2.4, ISO 50, 1/369s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: vivo X200 Ultra (85mm) - f/2.3, ISO 116, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, short tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70mm) - f/1.8, ISO 50, 1/148s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, short tele: Huawei (89mm) • Oppo (70mm) • Samsung (69mm) • vivo (85mm) • Xiaomi (70mm)

Longer zoom portraits are probably the best out of the Huawei and the vivo even if per-pixel quality at 135mm is ever so slightly below their native results. The Oppo's native 135mm camera doesn't appear to be on the same level, though it's not too bad itself. The Xiaomi continues its unremarkable people shots run, as does the Galaxy (even more so).

Portraits, medium tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.4, ISO 200, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (135mm) - f/3.1, ISO 1250, 1/63s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (115mm) - f/3.4, ISO 640, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: vivo X200 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.3, ISO 929, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (100mm) - f/2.6, ISO 1250, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, tele: Huawei (135mm) • Oppo (135mm) • Samsung (115mm) • vivo (135mm) • Xiaomi (100mm)

Portraits, medium tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.4, ISO 100, 1/156s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (135mm) - f/3.1, ISO 100, 1/103s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (115mm) - f/3.4, ISO 64, 1/321s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: vivo X200 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.3, ISO 101, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Portraits, medium tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (100mm) - f/2.6, ISO 200, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Portraits, tele: Huawei (135mm) • Oppo (135mm) • Samsung (115mm) • vivo (135mm) • Xiaomi (100mm)

Closeups comparison

Closeups gradually became one of the more important aspects of a phone's camera performance and we enjoy them as much as the next guy. Close-focusing telephotos are easily our favorite and the nearest they can focus, the better - of course. There are nuances with these phones - some can get closer with their short telephoto, others use the longer lens for best results. In some cases, you could get top closeups at non-native zoom levels too, or you can even prefer the wider focal lengths of the main cameras.

Huawei Oppo Samsung vivo Xiaomi
Pura 80 Ultra Find X8 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra X200 Ultra 15 Ultra
Main 50MP, 23mm 50MP, 23mm 200MP, 23mm 50MP, 35mm 50MP, 23mm
Min focus 12cm 14cm 8cm 20cm 13cm
Tele 1 50MP, 89mm, 3.7x 50MP, 70mm, 3.0x 12MP, 69mm, 3.0x 200MP, 85mm, 3.7x 50MP, 70mm, 3.0x
Min focus 12cm 10cm 18cm 14cm 9cm
Tele 2 12.5MP, 240mm, 10x 50MP, 135mm, 6.0x 50MP, 115mm, 5.0x 200MP, 100mm,4.3x
Min focus 110cm 95cm 25cm 40cm

Out of all the main cameras, the Galaxy will get you the largest reproduction ratio and most subject separation, though this camera isn't really exemplary in its sharpness at its minimum focusing distance. In fact, none of the phones is at its finest at minimum focusing distance with the main camera, but the others do look a little better in one way or another.

There's always the potential issue of being so close to your subject that you cast a shadow over it - this is more pronounced on the Galaxy, as the flipside to its closest focusing.

Closeups, main camera: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 80, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 200, 1/118s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 160, 1/68s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 297, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 500, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, main camera: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

Closeups, main camera: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (24mm) - f/2.0, ISO 50, 1/152s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.8, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.7, ISO 160, 1/180s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: vivo X200 Ultra (35mm) - f/1.7, ISO 107, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, main camera: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (23mm) - f/1.6, ISO 400, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, main camera: Huawei (24mm) • Oppo (23mm) • Samsung (23mm) • vivo (35mm) • Xiaomi (23mm)

The Oppo and Xiaomi will be able to focus closer with their short telephotos rather than the long ones, while the Galaxy does get closer with its 5x camera. The Huawei's 110cm minimum focusing distance at 10x renders that zoom level impractical for the purpose, though the inbetween 5.6x/135mm option remains (as well as arbitrary inbetween options, of course). The single-tele vivo is its own special case again, with the 85mm native zoom level being the obvious choice, but the 135mm and 170mm digital zooms remain viable options.

At the short tele zoom level, the Galaxy isn't remotely competitive - not in reproduction and also not in quality. The Xiaomi isn't exactly great either or at least not as good as the other three. We'd pick the Oppo as the sharpest shooter in this set, though it does suffer from those pesky longitudinal chromatic aberrations in out of focus areas (which you may or may not notice, plus they don't necessarily have to appear in all scenes). The vivo is perhaps the second best here when it comes to sharpness and magnification, and the Huawei comes in third.

Closeups, short tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (89mm) - f/2.4, ISO 320, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (70mm) - f/2.1, ISO 500, 1/53s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (69mm) - f/2.4, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: vivo X200 Ultra (85mm) - f/2.3, ISO 667, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70mm) - f/1.8, ISO 400, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, short tele: Huawei (89mm) • Oppo (70mm) • Samsung (69mm) • vivo (85mm) • Xiaomi (70mm)

Closeups, short tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (89mm) - f/2.4, ISO 50, 1/114s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (70mm) - f/2.1, ISO 320, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (69mm) - f/2.4, ISO 125, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: vivo X200 Ultra (85mm) - f/2.3, ISO 283, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, short tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70mm) - f/1.8, ISO 200, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, short tele: Huawei (89mm) • Oppo (70mm) • Samsung (69mm) • vivo (85mm) • Xiaomi (70mm)

Zooming in further, the Galaxy's 5x camera isn't a whole lot more capable to take on the others for the closeups title. The 95cm minimum focusing of the Oppo's long tele makes it unusable for nearby subjects, and the 40cm of the 4.3x Xiaomi second zoom camera is also not great. This leaves the Huawei and the vivo to battle it out with their 85-ish mm telephotos zoomed in to 135mm, and both are doing quite alright - we tend to prefer the Pura pencils and the vivo pocket watch.

Closeups, long tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.4, ISO 320, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (135mm) - f/3.1, ISO 640, 1/52s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (115mm) - f/3.4, ISO 1600, 1/359s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: vivo X200 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.3, ISO 778, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (100mm) - f/2.6, ISO 2000, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, long tele: Huawei (135mm) • Oppo (135mm) • Samsung (115mm) • vivo (135mm) • Xiaomi (100mm)

Closeups, long tele: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.4, ISO 50, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Oppo Find X8 Ultra (135mm) - f/3.1, ISO 800, 1/95s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (115mm) - f/3.4, ISO 160, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: vivo X200 Ultra (135mm) - f/2.3, ISO 201, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Closeups, long tele: Xiaomi 15 Ultra (100mm) - f/2.6, ISO 2000, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison
Closeups, long tele: Huawei (135mm) • Oppo (135mm) • Samsung (115mm) • vivo (135mm) • Xiaomi (100mm)

Selfies comparison

Selfies likely don't carry as much importance in a 'serious' cameraphone, but it never hurts having a good front-facing camera for the occasional snap. The approaches here vary too, with focal lengths ranging from an almost ultrawide 21mm on the Huawei to the almost too narrow 26mm on the Galaxy. The above two phones rely on conventional RGB sensors, while the other three employ Quad Bayer-type sensors in one form or another. All but the Xiaomi feature autofocus too - the 15 Ultra's fixed-focus front-facing camera is a bit out of place in this bunch.

Huawei Oppo Samsung vivo Xiaomi
Pura 80 Ultra Find X8 Ultra Galaxy S25 Ultra X200 Ultra 15 Ultra
Sensor 13MP 50MP Samsung JN5 12MP Samsung 3LU 50MP Samsung JN1 32MP OmniVision OV32B40
Sensor/pixel size 1/2.74", 0.8µm-1.6µm 1/3.2", 1.12µm 1/2.76", 0.64µm-1.28µm 1/3.14", 0.7µm-1.4µm
Lens 21mm, f/2.0 21mm, f/2.4 26mm, f/2.2 24mm, f/2.5 22mm, f/2.0, FF

In as few words as possible, we're probably liking the Huawei selfies the most. The wide coverage is most welcome, they're nicely sharp, skin tones are looking good, exposures and dynamic range are perhaps the best judged of the bunch. The vivo is about as good, albeit slightly narrower in its field of view. The Galaxy's colors are somewhat over the top and sharpness isn't great. The 32MP Oppo shots could benefit from some downscaling, and that applies to the Xiaomi as well, which is also let down by its fixed focus.

Selfies: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 50, 1/422s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Oppo Find X8 Ultra - f/2.4, ISO 64, 1/167s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra - f/2.2, ISO 25, 1/285s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: vivo X200 Ultra - f/2.5, ISO 50, 1/100s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Xiaomi 15 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 50, 1/245s - Ultra camera comparison
Selfies: Huawei • Oppo • Samsung • vivo • Xiaomi

Selfies: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 200, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Oppo Find X8 Ultra - f/2.4, ISO 320, 1/42s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra - f/2.2, ISO 320, 1/120s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: vivo X200 Ultra - f/2.5, ISO 499, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Xiaomi 15 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 100, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Selfies: Huawei • Oppo • Samsung • vivo • Xiaomi

Selfies: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 125, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Oppo Find X8 Ultra - f/2.4, ISO 200, 1/35s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra - f/2.2, ISO 320, 1/120s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: vivo X200 Ultra - f/2.5, ISO 302, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Xiaomi 15 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 100, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison
Selfies: Huawei • Oppo • Samsung • vivo • Xiaomi

Selfies: Huawei Pura 80 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 160, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Oppo Find X8 Ultra - f/2.4, ISO 250, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra - f/2.2, ISO 200, 1/120s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: vivo X200 Ultra - f/2.5, ISO 397, 1/33s - Ultra camera comparison Selfies: Xiaomi 15 Ultra - f/2.0, ISO 100, 1/50s - Ultra camera comparison
Selfies: Huawei • Oppo • Samsung • vivo • Xiaomi

Next Page » 5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  1. 1. Intro, specs overview
  2. 2. Photos: Ultrawide to standard comparison (13-50mm), daylight
  3. 3. Photos: Telephoto comparison (70mm and up), daylight
  4. 4. Photos: Portraits, closeups, selfies
  5. 5. Photos: Ultrawide to standard, low light
  6. 6. Photos: Telephoto, low light
  7. 7. Video recording: Daylight
  8. 8. Video recording: Low light
  9. 9. Wrap-up
  10.  
  11. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra 5G specification
  12. Oppo Find X8 Ultra specification
  13. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra specification
  14. vivo X200 Ultra specification
  15. Xiaomi 15 Ultra specification
  16. Review comments (239)

Reviews The Ultra cameraphone comparisonPage 4
  • Comments (239)
  • Pura 80 Ultra
  • Find X8 Ultra

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • Nothing
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • Ulefone
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • RugOne
  • Umidigi
  • Coolpad
  • Oscal
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Asus
  • Tecno
  • Doogee
  • Blackview
  • Cubot
  • Oukitel
  • Itel
  • TCL

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENT

Popular reviews

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Z Fold8 Ultra, Z Flip8 hands-on review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8, Z Fold8 Ultra, Z Flip8 hands-on review
Motorola Edge 70 Pro review
Motorola Edge 70 Pro review
RedMagic Astra 2 review
RedMagic Astra 2 review
ADVERTISEMENT

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Dongfeng’s 1.5 MW ultra-fast charger raises the bar - five-minute EV charging is real Dongfeng’s 1.5 MW ultra-fast charger raises the bar - five-minute EV charging is real Musk denies Tesla might sacrifice its best car factory to reach the starsXiaomi invests in a battery-swapping company, but it's far from entering the market
ADVERTISEMENT
Ads by Playwire

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS Youtube Instagram TikTok Facebook Twitter

© 2000-2026 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use