Progress begins when “I’m done” turns into “What else?” Here's why: You stopped too early, and that’s where the answer lives. Because progress isn’t an event. It’s a mindset. And it’s the foundation of real innovation. Too often, we treat testing like a checklist: ✔ Tried A. ✔ Tried B. ✔ Tried C. And when none of them work, we say: “We’ve exhausted the possibilities.” But here’s the truth: 🔎 You haven’t tested everything. 🔎 You haven’t looked between the lines. 🔎 You haven’t asked the question behind the question. Innovation isn’t about finding “the answer.” It’s about staying open-minded enough to see the answers that hide in unexpected places. The next breakthrough often comes when you stop forcing outcomes… and start exploring patterns, anomalies, and little sparks that others overlook. 💡 Testing isn’t about proving what you already believe. It’s about uncovering what you didn’t even think to look for. Here's 5 ways to implement a “You haven’t exhausted all possibilities” mentality: 1. Redefine testing as exploration → Don’t run a test just to confirm what you believe. → Run it to discover what you don’t know yet. → Every “failed” test is actually data pointing you toward something you missed. 2. Shift from Either/Or to Both/And → Instead of asking “Does A work or does B?” → Ask: “What if parts of A and B combined create something new?” → The in-between often holds the breakthrough. 3. Document assumptions, then flip them → Write down your “obvious truths.” → Challenge each one: What if the opposite were true? → This forces fresh angles that rarely show up in traditional brainstorming. 4. Zoom out, then zoom in → When stuck, step back to look at the bigger system: are you solving the right problem? → Then zoom in: small tweaks (like word choice, timing, or context) often unlock big shifts. 5. Stay curious longer than comfortable → Most people give up when testing gets repetitive or results feel flat. → True innovators keep pulling the thread, asking why again and again, until something new emerges. So the real challenge is this: ➡️ Are you open-minded enough to keep testing after you think you’re done? ________ ♻️ Repost to help others + Follow Jennelle McGrath for more leadership insights
Tips for Cultivating Open-Mindedness in Problem Solving
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Open-mindedness in problem solving means staying receptive to new ideas and considering multiple perspectives, often leading to more creative and practical solutions. Cultivating this mindset helps you move beyond routine answers and discover opportunities hidden in unexpected places.
- Challenge assumptions: Regularly question your own beliefs and invite others to share their perspectives to uncover angles you may have missed.
- Explore possibilities: Approach problems as opportunities to learn by trying combinations, asking “what if” questions, and seeking patterns that aren’t immediately obvious.
- Schedule reflection: Make time each week to pause, think, and review challenges without rushing; this can reveal insights and reduce bias in your decisions.
-
-
#LateralThinking, a term coined by Edward de Bono in the 1960s, or flexible thinking, refers to a problem-solving approach that involves looking at a situation or problem from unexpected angles, thereby enabling innovative solutions. 1. Encourages #Creativity: Lateral thinking taps into the imaginative aspect of our minds. By breaking free from conventional routines and patterns of thought, individuals can generate unique ideas and solutions that would otherwise remain undiscovered. 2. Enhances #ProblemSolving Skills: Traditional methodologies often rely on linear or logical progression, which can be limiting. Lateral thinking introduces a more dynamic approach, allowing for multiple potential solutions to be considered. 3. Fosters #Innovation: In business and technology, innovation is critical for maintaining competitive advantage. Organizations that promote lateral thinking among their teams are more likely to develop breakthrough products and services, as employees feel empowered to propose unconventional ideas. 4. Improves #Collaboration: By encouraging diverse perspectives and brainstorming sessions, lateral thinking leads to greater collaboration among team members. Different viewpoints can inspire a more inclusive environment that values contributions from all members, leading to richer, more robust solutions. Key Techniques for Cultivating Lateral Thinking 1. Questioning Assumptions: Begin by identifying and challenging the assumptions that underlie your thinking. Techniques such as the “Five Whys” can help dig deeper into the root causes of a problem. 2. Mind Mapping: This technique involves visualizing ideas and solutions around a central concept. By mapping out thoughts in a non-linear way, you can see connections between ideas that may not be apparent in a structured list format. 3. Random Input: Introduce an unrelated stimulus (a word, image, or object) into your thinking process. This random input can trigger novel associations and stimulate new ideas that can lead to unconventional solutions. 4. Role Play: Assume different roles or perspectives related to the problem at hand. For instance, thinking from the viewpoint of the customer, competitor, or even an inanimate object can provide fresh insights and reveal untapped solutions. 5. SCAMPER Technique: The acronym stands for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put to another use, Eliminate, and Reverse. This brainstorming approach encourages you to manipulate and explore existing products or ideas, leading to innovation and new concepts. 6. Creative Constraints: Sometimes, placing specific constraints on your thinking can paradoxically foster creativity. For instance, limit your resources or time, or impose specific rules (e.g., generate only ideas that involve a specific color). In an age where change is the only constant, one thing remains clear: the ability to think laterally is a powerful asset for any problem-solver.
-
Passionate problem solvers are easy to label as "too negative" or "having an agenda". Here's a good approach to bringing people on the journey: 1. Start with what you see and hear Describe specific behaviors, patterns, or outcomes as objectively as possible (knowing that we can never be truly objective). Be mindful of your potential biases. Are your emotions and perspective narrowing what you bring up? Avoid using loaded or triggering language. Keep it neutral and clear. 2. Invite others to share what they see and hear By starting with your own observations, you are setting an example for the rest of the team. Invite the team to share their perspectives and observations in ways that focus on understanding, rather than labeling or jumping to conclusions. In the right context, it might be better to start here. 3. Look inwards, observe, and listen Just as you describe outward behaviors, turn inward and notice how you feel about what you’re seeing and hearing. Instead of saying, “This place is a pressure cooker,” try, “I feel a lot of pressure.” Avoid jumping to conclusions or ascribing blame. Again, invite other people to do the same. 4. Spot areas to explore With observations and emotions on the table, identify areas worth examining. Avoid rushing to label them as problems or opportunities. Instead, frame them as questions or areas to look into. This keeps the tone open and focused on discovery. 5. Explore and go deeper As potential areas emerge, repeat the earlier steps: describe what you see, invite others to share, and observe how you feel. It is a recursive/iterative process—moving up and down levels of detail. 6. Look for alignment and patterns Notice where people are starting to align on what they’d like to see more—or less—of. Pay attention to areas where there’s consistent divergence—these are opportunities as well. Ask, “What might it take to narrow the divide?” 7. Frame clear opportunities Once patterns emerge, focus on turning them into clear opportunities. These are not solutions—they’re starting points for exploration. For example: “We could improve this handoff process” or “We’re not all on the same page about priorities.” Keep it actionable and forward-looking. 8. Brainstorm small experiments Use opportunities as a springboard to brainstorm simple, manageable experiments. Think of these as ways to test and learn, not perfect fixes. For example: “What if we tried a weekly check-in for this process?” Keep the ideas practical and easy to implement. 9. Stay grounded and flexible Be mindful of how the group is feeling and responding as you brainstorm. Are people rushing to solutions or becoming stuck? If so, take a step back and revisit earlier steps to re-center the group. 10. Step back. Let the group own it Once there’s momentum, step back and hand over ownership to the group. Avoid holding onto the issue as “your problem.” Trust the process you’ve built and the team’s ability to move things forward collectively.
-
From "𝐘𝐨𝐮'𝐫𝐞 𝐖𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠" to "𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗠𝗲": The Power of Open-Minded Asking And Five Steps To Conflict Resolution👇️ When disagreements flare up, our instincts often lead us to insults or attacks on not just the opposing viewpoint, but on the person as well. This never works. Vitriolic responses close more minds than they change, making enemies out of friends and rivals out of allies. Curiosity is more effective than verbal assault if you aim to genuinely convince others. The next time you lock horns with someone, try this approach to turn disagreement into open-minded dialogue: 𝟏) 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐔𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 Rather than impatiently waiting for your turn to retort, focus first on comprehending their perspective. Confirm what aspects you do agree with to build common ground. Suspend judgments as you ask clarifying questions to grasp why they came to this stance. 𝟐) 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐈𝐧𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞 𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 Once you comprehend their position, drill down diplomatically: “I’m curious why you feel that way. What led you to these conclusions?” People want to feel heard before opening up, so don’t invalidate their logic. 𝟑) 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫𝐬 People are more open to hearing you after you've listened to them—without interrupting or arguing. Now, you can explain your reasoning in a non-confrontational way. Find threads of commonality between your perspectives as you clarify why you landed differently. The goal is elucidating, not conquering, the other viewpoint. 𝟒) 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 Having traded views, ask, “Where do we agree?’ Name shared values, interests, or outcomes you both see as important. This reminds you that you likely have some common ground, even in disagreements. Remember: Everyone wants the same basic things out of life. You'd be surprised how often you and your adversary agree once you get past the superficial presentation of the ideas. 𝟓) 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐲𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐳𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 With mutual understanding built, you can bridge perspectives by asking, “How can we work together to get the best both worldviews?” Rather than clinging to singular stances, brainstorm creative solutions that integrate your collective wisdom. Heated debates often generate more hostility than progress. But by replacing reactive arguments with open-minded curiosity, you can transform conflict into wisdom-generating collaboration. Next time things get tense, set egos aside long enough to ask, “Why?” You might be surprised by what you can learn. #communication #community #onlinecommunities #personaldevelopment #connections #networking #socialnetworking
-
🧐Slow Thinking Isn’t Lazy — It’s Strategic In our always-on, hyper-responsive world, the pressure to decide quickly is real. But what if the fastest answer isn’t the best one? Dan Pontefract’s Open to Think urges us to resist the reflex to react. Instead, he recommends cultivating “open thinking”—a balance of creativity, critical judgment, and applied action. One key element? Reflection. ⏲️Practice: Schedule Thinking Time Like a Meeting This sounds overly simple, but few of us actually do it. Try blocking 30 minutes a week just to reflect—on a challenge, a pattern you’ve noticed, or even a gut instinct that’s been nagging at you. Bring a question and a blank page. You don’t need an answer at the end—you need space. Backing Data: A University of Texas study found that reflective thinking significantly improves decision-making quality by increasing clarity of priorities and reducing cognitive bias (Giurge et al., 2018). And a another report notes that senior leaders who build in time for deep thought are 2x as likely to feel “purposeful and clear-headed.” ⏱️Pushback I Hear: “I Don’t Have Time.” You do. The average knowledge worker spends 2.5 hours per day on email (Adobe, 2022). You can reclaim 30 minutes. More importantly, you can’t afford not to. Poor decisions cost far more in rework and repair than time spent thinking ever will. A Tip from the Open Thinking Playbook: “Don’t exploit your time. Explore it.” Try it this week. Block time. Ask a hard question. Just think.
-
🧠 The True Sign of Intelligence: Embracing Different Opinions Without Conflict In an era where digital discourse often feels more like a battlefield than a marketplace of ideas, it’s easy to forget one of the most profound indicators of true intelligence: 🎯 Why Intelligent Leaders Welcome Different Opinions Leaders who cultivate environments where differing opinions are welcomed—not feared—unlock deeper collaboration, creativity, and trust. Here’s why: 🧩 Innovation Thrives on Diversity When everyone agrees, creativity stalls. Innovative breakthroughs often emerge when different perspectives challenge conventional thinking. True leaders recognize that diverse viewpoints spark better solutions. 🤝 Building Trust Through Respect Respecting differing opinions shows that you value individuals, not just their agreement. Trust is built when people feel heard and understood, even when their views diverge. ⚖️ Strength in Intellectual Humility Admitting that you don’t have all the answers fosters growth. Leaders who listen to dissenting opinions often refine their perspectives and make better decisions. 🌍 A Broader Worldview Exposure to multiple viewpoints expands your understanding of the world. Leaders who seek out and consider diverse opinions cultivate empathy, which enhances team dynamics and decision-making. 💡 The Cost of Intellectual Rigidity Failing to embrace differing opinions can be costly, both professionally and personally: 📉 Missed Opportunities: Dismissing opposing views can blind you to better solutions or innovations. 🤷♂️ Team Disengagement: Employees who feel their opinions don’t matter are less likely to contribute meaningfully. 🔥 Culture of Fear: Environments where disagreement is punished stifle creativity and erode trust. 🛠️ How to Cultivate an Open Mindset Understanding different perspectives doesn’t mean abandoning your values or agreeing with every viewpoint. It means being intellectually curious and emotionally mature enough to engage without hostility. Here’s how to do it: 🧠 Practice Active Listening Don’t listen to respond—listen to understand. Give the speaker your full attention, ask clarifying questions, and resist the urge to formulate a rebuttal while they’re still talking. 🤔 Challenge Your Own Biases We all have cognitive biases that shape our thinking. Regularly challenge your assumptions by seeking out perspectives that contradict your own. 🎯 Focus on Common Goals Even when opinions differ, shared goals can unite. Redirect conversations toward what you both want to achieve, emphasizing shared outcomes. 📚 When Opinions Collide: Case Study of Success Consider Satya Nadella’s leadership at Microsoft. When Nadella took the helm, he didn’t double down on the status quo—he invited diverse viewpoints and encouraged a “learn-it-all” mindset. His emphasis on empathy, humility, and curiosity transformed Microsoft’s culture and sparked a period of unprecedented growth and innovation.
-
Innovation is unlikely to be achieved through consistent, conventional thinking. Most teams unknowingly favour 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴—and it’s limiting their potential. Ever been in a meeting where big, bold ideas get shut down too soon? Or one where endless brainstorming leads to zero action? That’s the clash of Divergent vs. Convergent Thinking—and most workplaces get the balance wrong. Convergent thinkers love logic, structure, and clear answers. Divergent thinkers thrive on possibilities, creativity, and unconventional ideas. The real challenge? Most workplaces reward convergence and overlook divergence. 💡 If you’ve ever felt like your ideas weren’t landing, this might be why. (Chances are, you already use both thinking styles—just not in the right sequence.) Here’s how to make both work for you, not against you: 1) Don’t Judge Ideas Too Soon ↳ Separate Idea Generation from Decision-Making ⎌ Innovation dies when every idea is scrutinized immediately. ✔︎ First, expand possibilities—then refine. 2) Create a Safe Space for Bold Ideas ↳ Creativity flourishes when ideas evolve, not when they’re dismissed. ⎌ Innovation dies in judgment-heavy environments. ✔︎ Encourage “Yes, and…” instead of “No, but…” to keep ideas flowing. 3) Pair Opposites for Problem-Solving ↳ Convergent thinkers help refine wild ideas. ↳ Divergent thinkers help break rigid thinking patterns. ⎌ Mixing the two? That’s where teams get stuck. 4) Pair Thinkers Strategically ↳ Visionaries need detail-oriented partners to bring ideas to life. ↳ Give each role equal importance. ✔︎ If an idea feels too safe, ask, “What’s a bolder alternative?” ✔︎ If it’s too abstract, ask, “How do we make this actionable?” 5) Create Space for Both Thinking Modes ⎌ People won’t share unconventional ideas if they fear judgment. ✔︎ Encourage curiosity over criticism. ↳ Schedule separate sessions for idea generation vs. decision-making. ✔︎ You’ll get better ideas and faster execution. 💡 The best teams don’t just have great ideas—they know how to shape them into reality. Which thinking style do you lean toward? Comment below! ------------------- I’m Jayant Ghosh. Follow me in raising awareness for mental health that inspires growth and well-being.
-
🔭 Stuck on a problem? You might be too close to see the solution. Leadership isn’t about having all the answers. Trying to tackle setbacks alone? That’s a fast track to blind spots, slow decisions, and missed opportunities. The best leaders lean on their network—not just for support, but for fresh perspectives that fuel innovation and resilience. Here’s how to turn collaboration into your problem-solving superpower: 📌 Tap into your peer network. Don’t reinvent the wheel. Reach out to peers who’ve faced similar challenges. Be specific: “I’m navigating [challenge]. I remember you dealt with something similar. How did you approach it?” Trusted advisors can offer insights you hadn’t considered. I recently leaned on the wisdom of Carolyn Hewson, Karen Wood and Ghazaleh Lyari when considering a new Board opportunity. Their insights were invaluable. 📌 Hold a team post-mortem. Create a safe space to review setbacks without blame. Start by sharing what you, as a leader, could have done differently—this builds trust. Then ask: ✅ What worked well that we should continue? ✅ What didn’t go as planned? ✅ What’s one change we can implement immediately? 📌 Break out of your echo chamber. Fresh eyes bring fresh solutions. Seek input from unexpected sources—a junior team member, a client, or even a friend outside your industry. A simple, “What do you see that I might be missing?” can unlock game-changing insights. Some of my favourite suggestions for Human Leadership Lab have come from my former clients and collaborators. The strongest leaders don’t go it alone—they ask, listen, and adapt. 👉 Who is someone in your network who pushes your thinking? Tag someone in the comments! #LinkedInNewsAustralia #leadership #setbacks #coaching #collaboration
-
Career lies I used to believe: “Don’t question authority.” “Put your head down & work.” “Stay in your lane.” “Let your work speak for itself.” Earlier in my career, I remember sitting in a meeting with senior leaders, nodding along as they discussed a strategy I didn’t fully agree with. I felt the weight of my upbringing — a culture where respect meant silence and deferring to authority. When I left the meeting, my manager pulled me aside and said, “You need to push back more. It’s a part of your job.” I was confused. To me, pushing back felt disrespectful. But the more I observed, the more I noticed something: the people who spoke up — who shared their perspectives and questioned the status quo — earned respect. They weren’t seen as troublemakers, but as thought partners who helped refine ideas. I realized that it wasn’t about being confrontational; it was about engaging with purpose, offering alternatives, and pushing the conversation forward. 💡 Silence = invisibility. 💡 Pushback ≠ disrespect. It’s valuable. Here are some ways I’ve learned to voice my perspective in a way that feels true to my communication style: ➕ Reframe pushback as partnership – Saying “I don’t agree” shuts the door. Saying “I see your point, and I’d add…” keeps you in the conversation. ➕ Lean into your curiosity – Asking “What would happen if we tried X instead?” makes you sound like a thinker and creative problem-solver. ➕ Offer solutions, not just opinions – Frame your perspective as a fix, not a fight. ➕ Acknowledge, THEN challenge – Start with “That’s a great point,” then introduce your perspective. People listen when they feel heard. ➕ Align with team goals – “We both want the same outcome, and this might help us get there faster.” Have you experienced this too? What else would you add?
-
During my first day at Teach for America, Wendy Kopp gave me some advice I have carried with me ever since: “Don’t try to make it appear like you have it all figured out. Instead, ask the people around you. Ask them to tell you what you’re missing. Ask them how they’d approach your challenge. Ask them for help. If you want to make a difference here, don’t be afraid to ask.” Too often, when we get stuck, we try to figure it out on our own instead of asking others to help us. But inviting others into our problem solving process can lead to the breakthrough we need or a creative solution we never could have reached on our own.