The rise of AI is undeniably transforming traditional animation workflows—especially when it comes to keyframing. In Frame 2, AI was used to generate alternate angles of the scene, including a close-up of the mouse, while also capturing the character’s excitement (with effective prompting). This showcases how AI can enhance storytelling through dynamic perspective and expression. Both approaches serving different creative purposes, Frame 1 holding value for intentional animations requiring less motion. Also not forgetting that it is time-intensive to create. Which do you prefer, without AI or with AI? #AIanimation #2D #AnimationTech #CreativeEfficiency #AfterEffects #HiggsfieldAI

Ai is dying - investors are jumping ship - everyone hates slop. Also it's theft. See the problem yet?

Prefer without... just shoot multiple angles then you would have saved time. PLUS you'd actually be proud of work YOU'VE made as opposed to a machine. Use AI for what it was meant for... to speed up work flow and remove mundane tasks. Not create mind numbing slop that's trying to kill an industry.

Like
Reply

Frame 2 definitely feels like it has more 'breath' to it.

Like
Reply

I'd prefer a 'Without AI' version that uses a multitude of shots from different angles. If this were a lab test the results would be skewed.Everyone knows lingering on a frame too long will cause viewers to switch off.

I can see its use cases. It can automate some animations where you don’t need a bunch of control to make it look right

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories