Skip to main content
34 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 11, 2022 at 5:00 comment added Michael Hardy Vermont and Texas.
Sep 11, 2019 at 13:44 comment added rexkogitans German Democratic Republic joined Federal Republic of Germany in 1990.
Sep 11, 2019 at 11:22 vote accept Allure
Sep 11, 2019 at 9:48 answer added Rohit timeline score: 7
Sep 11, 2019 at 5:10 review Close votes
Sep 11, 2019 at 9:58
Sep 11, 2019 at 5:10 answer added Dale M timeline score: 5
Sep 10, 2019 at 18:38 history protected Pieter Geerkens
Sep 10, 2019 at 18:36 answer added James Bradley timeline score: 4
Sep 10, 2019 at 16:08 answer added Piskvor timeline score: 1
Sep 10, 2019 at 8:05 answer added Oscar Bravo timeline score: 13
Sep 10, 2019 at 5:40 answer added Jan timeline score: 6
Sep 10, 2019 at 3:37 comment added Allure @Greg yes, public referendum (preferably not at gunpoint) into cessation of existence. Not interested in a single country breaking up.
Sep 10, 2019 at 3:35 answer added Tim Andrews timeline score: 4
Sep 10, 2019 at 3:28 comment added Daniel What about the 1707 merging of the English and Scottish parliaments or rather the absorption of the Scottish one into Westminster.
Sep 9, 2019 at 19:13 answer added Stefan Kögl timeline score: 12
Sep 9, 2019 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1171121316004585472
Sep 9, 2019 at 15:05 comment added Roger Unclear whether 'in-place replacements' -- like the USSR ceasing to exist -- are within scope or not.
Sep 9, 2019 at 14:39 comment added Russell McMahon Your OZ/NZ example is backwards, but, we don't REALLY want them. A NZ Prime Minister once famously remarked on people who were leaving NZ for Australia in protest " ... thereby increasing the average IQ of both countries ." :-)
Sep 9, 2019 at 14:15 comment added T.E.D. @axsvl77 - Yeah, I don't think I'd count "votes" that happened while the donor country was occupied by the military of the prospective recipient.
Sep 9, 2019 at 13:24 comment added TRiG Australia wouldn't have to agree to NZ joining: NZ could do so unilaterally. The Australian constitution already allows for this.
Sep 9, 2019 at 11:52 answer added Radovan Garabík timeline score: 7
Sep 9, 2019 at 10:22 comment added Stuart F Yemen is another possible case, when North and South Yemen merged. There wasn't an explicit vote prior to merging, but there was on a unified constitution for the new country. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemeni_unification
Sep 9, 2019 at 9:46 history became hot network question
Sep 9, 2019 at 9:13 comment added LаngLаngС @Bregalad Somehow it does. But: That is a bit of a stretch regarding plebiscites that needs a full answer to be argued in its favour (Saar would be less of a stretch for the voting conditions, but perhaps on sovereignty)
Sep 9, 2019 at 8:19 comment added Bregalad Austria in 1938 comes in mind.
Sep 9, 2019 at 6:31 comment added LаngLаngС 'Britain joining the EU' (then EEC/EC but at least staying when it became EU, according to Brexiters)?
Sep 9, 2019 at 4:57 comment added Greg When you talk about a vote is it a public referendum focusing specifically and exclusively on the change of state? In a way, the breakup of Soviet Union, the Baltic States joining the SU (OK, just kidding), the break up of Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, the reunion of Germany, etc are cases when countries went out the existence and were politically supported by a large part of the population.
Sep 9, 2019 at 4:41 answer added jamesqf timeline score: 27
Sep 9, 2019 at 2:02 comment added Pieter Geerkens As noted in my answer below, Newfoundland was a Dominion from 1907 until 1933, when the Legislature voted the Dominion out of existence.
Sep 9, 2019 at 1:52 answer added Pieter Geerkens timeline score: 71
Sep 9, 2019 at 1:47 answer added Chris Stratton timeline score: 39
Sep 9, 2019 at 1:40 comment added Astor Florida Crimea voted for its own independence, then voted to join Russia. IMO, this doesn't really count.
Sep 9, 2019 at 1:39 comment added T.E.D. Didn't Texas do exactly that?
Sep 9, 2019 at 1:34 history asked Allure CC BY-SA 4.0