
The developers of Draw Things have launched Local Code, an open-source AI assistant that lets Mac users download models and put them to work on their own computers.

Well yeah because the only open source models that are targeting frontier models are from China, Qwen 3.8 Max is very impressive, and if it's run locally why are you concerned that they're Chinese?Nice except DeepSeek is Chinese, and I've not heard of Qwen but I suspect it is, too.
Why not the Meta one? And what other models can reasonably be run locally?
there are a ton of options to work locally. what makes this one better than the others? what makes it worthy of an article vs others?
Hi! Liu Liu here. Will try my best as this is not simple to clarify:It's interesting to see the breadth of difference in AI awareness in the comments, from "but it's a Chinese model!", to using tools that were frontier 3 years ago, to those using factory stacks now.
On my part, it feels like this is Yet Another UI Harness... Codex/Claude Code/Opencode/Open WebUI/ LM Studio Bionic/ omp / nanobot / and the other MLX centric ones. Its just like when we had a new opinionated framework release for every language just a few years back (but everyone's still using React).
would you trust Meta over chinese and Qwen is that ? some workloads then this more than acceptable. See some AI declines in shares recently, well for some enterprises string a bunch of studios together and run this or Llama etc ..Nice except DeepSeek is Chinese, and I've not heard of Qwen but I suspect it is, too.
Why not the Meta one? And what other models can reasonably be run locally?
Because Meta's one isn't very good. Google's ones are decent but the ones from Qwen have been a step ahead for a while now. They're truly fantastic for the size. Not sure what the issue is with running a Chinese model to you but the alternatives are models from US companies that have cozied up to that nonce in the US White House so it's not like they can be 'trusted'.Nice except DeepSeek is Chinese, and I've not heard of Qwen but I suspect it is, too.
Why not the Meta one? And what other models can reasonably be run locally?
I'm not sure what you're saying. A surprising amount of what data goes to China? Unless you specifically connect these models to the internet, they cannot communicate outside and even then, they don't 'phone home'. That's just not how they function. Now sure, the developer of this software could add in some kind of phone home ability but it's not the models doing that. And you can monitor that if you're paranoid with the likes of Little Snitch.Because a marketing statement that it is local does not necessarily mean that it is local.
You should monitor all of your outbound traffic. A surprising amount goes to China. Why?
I think you're misunderstanding how these models work and run locally. They don't 'escape'. They don't leave your computer. It's just a bit of software that runs on your machine. These models are not sentient or alive.How do you know the model is local, all of the major model creators have had their models escape into the wild.
The issue is not running it local, it is exactly how much you trust the program running the model and the OS's security concerning what it can do.
Because a marketing statement that it is local does not necessarily mean that it is local.Well yeah because the only open source models that are targeting frontier models are from China, Qwen 3.8 Max is very impressive, and if it's run locally why are you concerned that they're Chinese?
There are plenty of ways to run local models, you don't need to use this...Because a marketing statement that it is local does not necessarily mean that it is local.
You should monitor all of your outbound traffic. A surprising amount goes to China. Why?
Nope If you turn your network off, then I think you are good. I would however reboot before connecting the network back to make sure there are no queued network actions.I turn my network off when I'm running local LLMs. Are you suggesting that when I reconnect my network, all my data is suddenly being exported without my knowledge? How would I monitor that?
I fully agree. AI has its plus’s and minus’s but overall one of the big pain points is privacy and data ownership. We have these powerful “AI chips” in most modern computers, we should be doing a lot more AI on device.This is - IF it’s as advertised and if it works well (I recognize those are two big ifs) - fantastic.
I’m very interested in reading others thoughts on this, but it seems like a huge win.
I’m extremely uncomfortable with aspects of the LLMs. The more alternatives the better, particularly if it keeps my data private and doesn’t require a subscription. This is also potentially absolutely something Apple should love, as it further supports their approach to running as much AI on device as possible, which in turn will require the hardware capable of doing so, and which will ultimately translate into more sales for the mothership.
You have no clue what you are talking about. A model, in this context, is just a big file with a bunch of floating point numbers in it. If you run it locally, it’s local.Because a marketing statement that it is local does not necessarily mean that it is local.
You should monitor all of your outbound traffic. A surprising amount goes to China. Why?
I’m using them and they work amazingly well, but one concern about them being Chinese is even if they don’t have ill intent baked in (we don’t know for certain) and you run them locally, they can still behave a little suspiciously because of the data they were trained on: https://cohere.com/blog/concerning-behaviour-popular-open-weight-ai-modelWell yeah because the only open source models that are targeting frontier models are from China, Qwen 3.8 Max is very impressive, and if it's run locally why are you concerned that they're Chinese?
Liu Liu here. I don't know why it worth an article, but some comparisons:there are a ton of options to work locally. what makes this one better than the others? what makes it worthy of an article vs others?
Why do you care that it's Chinese (and, yes, Qwen models are also from China)? Models can't spy on you, you know! And if you suspect that any code it might produce has "back doors" or other such tin-foil-hat concerns, you can always examine said code before you do anything with it.Nice except DeepSeek is Chinese, and I've not heard of Qwen but I suspect it is, too.
Why not the Meta one? And what other models can reasonably be run locally?
thats all it is, I run ollama on a much larger Linux laptop than my air and works but not as nice as this oneI currently use Ollama + Qwen Model (qwen2.5-coder:32b) + Aider on my Mac. It's not great with large HTML/Javascript creation/updates when compared to Gemini, but for smaller changes it's great. And it's free.
It looks like this tool is basically just a front-end integration of the above? Maybe not even Aider (since it mentions not being able to modify local files due to sandboxing)?
I’m using them and they work amazingly well, but one concern about them being Chinese is even if they don’t have ill intent baked in (we don’t know for certain) and you run them locally, they can still behave a little suspiciously because of the data they were trained on: https://cohere.com/blog/concerning-behaviour-popular-open-weight-ai-model