I’ll be honest. I’m in a bad mood. I spent my entire morning reviewing surveys released over the wires since Monday (just 4 days!) and found 20+ companies failed to include methodology. No source. No dates of fielding. No indication if it was online, phone, proprietary data, or external panel. Nothing. Methodology used to be non-negotiable and a “must-have” that gave survey findings credibility. Without it, how can anyone assess the reliability of the results? When I don’t see/find a methodology I then doubt the survey design and automatically assume it was done poorly. If you’re putting out survey data, do your audience (and your brand) a favor: always include methodology. It makes your data trustworthy. #MarketResearch #Surveys #DataCredibility #CITEResearch
In each of our research projects we include a page or two on methodology Funny story. We were doing work for an electronic component manufacturer. They belonged to an association. The association counted the sale of the part to the OEM abd thr OEM sale to the contractor. It double counted the product making the market twice Our client started to build a new plant. I finally called the leading competitor saying I believe the market is half of what association says it is. They agreed.
I’ve seen this from the other side, too. Company runs survey. Gets questionable results. Decides to…interpret data. Doesn’t show methodology. Doesn’t get coverage. Gets mad about Company B with “worse” survey results getting “better” coverage. Wonder why that is.
Agree, Andrew. Methodology tells all the key details about the research and is the basis on which to trust - or not - the findings. When I was teaching one of the things I told my students was to always look at the methodology for all the reasons you noted and also to see who sponsored the research to factor that in to their understanding. Who What Where When Why How Always matter!