Skip to content

Conversation

@SallyHuo-TAOS
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please briefly describe the code changes in this pull request.

Checklist

Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.

  • Is the user manual updated?
  • Are the test cases passed and automated?
  • Is there no significant decrease in test coverage?
@SallyHuo-TAOS SallyHuo-TAOS requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 11:12
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @SallyHuo-TAOS, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a minor configuration change to the CI test suite. The primary goal is to reorder the execution of tests, specifically ensuring that the '82-UnitTest' runs with a higher priority. This adjustment aims to optimize the feedback loop by identifying potential issues earlier in the continuous integration process.

Highlights

  • Test Execution Order: The execution priority of the '82-UnitTest' within the CI pipeline has been adjusted. Its priority value was changed from '100' to '101', indicating it will now run earlier or with higher precedence.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to prioritize the execution of unit tests in the CI pipeline by increasing their priority value in the test/ci/cases.task file. The change from 100 to 101 achieves this for the current set of tests. However, my review includes a suggestion to use a significantly higher priority value to make this ordering more robust and prevent accidental reordering in the future, ensuring that these fast-feedback tests consistently run first as intended.

# 82-UnitTest

100,,n,cases,bash 82-UnitTest/test.sh
101,,n,cases,bash 82-UnitTest/test.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While changing the priority from 100 to 101 correctly places the unit tests before other tests with priority 100, this approach is somewhat fragile. If another test is added in the future with a priority higher than 101, the unit tests will no longer run first, which would defeat the purpose of this change.

To make the intention clearer and more robust for the long term, consider using a significantly higher priority number. This would create a larger gap and clearly signal that these crucial, fast-feedback tests should always run first, reducing the chance of accidental reordering. For example, a priority of 200 could be used.

200,,n,cases,bash 82-UnitTest/test.sh
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

2 participants