Jump to content

User talk:Nephellium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Nephellium, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nephelium aculeatum (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nephellium! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nephelium aculeatum (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nephelium aculeatum has been accepted

[edit]
Nephelium aculeatum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! This is my first article and you have helped a lot.Nephellium (talk) 19:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blyxa japonica (August 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Paul Vaurie was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Pseudotetraedriella kamillae

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Nephellium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pseudotetraedriella kamillae, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Blyxa japonica

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Nephellium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blyxa japonica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blyxa octandra (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Blyxa octandra instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
jlwoodwa (talk) 01:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Blyxa octandra

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Nephellium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blyxa octandra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Blyxa octandra

[edit]

Hello, Nephellium. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Blyxa octandra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dalrympelea sphaerocarpa has been accepted

[edit]
Dalrympelea sphaerocarpa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Greetings and salutations!

[edit]

Hello! I’m going to use this as a way to keep you up to date on the goals of the unofficial task force. Currently, they are:

Make Draft:Palgum good enough to be submitted for review (you have a lot of experience there, I can tell.)

Copyedit Etemenanki, and

Improve Wak Chanil Ajaw to C status.


Thanks! Wikipedian12512 (talk) 00:05, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I know User:Theroadislong, and it seems like they are a very active editor in terms of reviewing articles. I'll add some simple stuff, but it seems you and some other editors are waiting on a review, right? Nephellium (talk) 21:51, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Slight update: It seems some of the sources are considered to be "unreliable" for some reason. Perhaps it's the last source? It might be sponsored or run by Civilization VI. I'll try to find another source. Nephellium (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
No, the last one is fine. Even sponsored sources are allowed for facts. Wikipedian12512 (talk) 03:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Resubmitted! I hope it's fine this time :)! Hope you have some good editing over the weekend! Wikipedian12512(alt) (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Possibly you are…

[edit]

A WikiEnt?

@Nephellium @Nephellium(alt) Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 05:28, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I think so! Unfortunately, Wikipedia does not. I need to be at least two on the list to qualify: A WikiGnome, a WikiElf, a WikiDwarf, or a WikiFairy. I am only one of these. Nephellium (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
“Not meet the above condition, but promote peaceful, unprovocative interactions.”
I think you qualify. Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 17:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Also, I just added WP:WikiTree. Hope you never become that! In solidarityWikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 01:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Here:

[edit]

mw.loader.load( '/w/index.php?title=User:Evad37/rater.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' ); // Backlink: User:Evad37/rater.js In solidarityWikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 16:32, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Nephellium (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duguetia magnolioidea has been accepted

[edit]
Duguetia magnolioidea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 00:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duguetia rolimii has been accepted

[edit]
Duguetia rolimii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 23:17, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duguetia marcgraviana has been accepted

[edit]
Duguetia marcgraviana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 00:50, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply