Samsung the devil who shook hands to the AI Basterds to fix the ram prices.
.alpha, 05 Apr 2026If you follow tech and understand the technical details, there haven't been meaningful di... moreThat's funny.
If you follow tech and understand the technical details, there haven't been meaningful difference between Korean and Chinese components for at least 2 years. Major western reviewers don't have the technical skill to review components but Chinese reviewers have
Minu, 04 Apr 2026Agreed, but if that's the case, why would they push LCDs for larger displays and penny pi... moreMost OLEDs kind of suck at text clarity for the given resolution due to the subpixel layout, and larger displays are more often used for reading than smaller ones so it often makes sense to sacrifice the contrast for the better text experience. They're also still not great in bright lighting because they're 100% emissive, it's not uncommon for an 800 nit LCD to be more usable in sunlight than a 2000 nit OLED.
Typically OLEDs are less reliable too, ironically Samsung's in particular.
Minu, 04 Apr 2026Agreed, but if that's the case, why would they push LCDs for larger displays and penny pi... moreBecause oled display have burn in
So when people buy oled its a ticking bomb
Meaning... It's good for Samsung
Anonymous, 04 Apr 2026What a load of rubbish!
Samsung actually manufactures its own RAM modules, but prefers to sel... moreThey try to "strain" china dram
Make sure xiaomi oppo vivo Huawei honor buy the expensive one
Sam N8 808 owner, 03 Apr 2026Clean your OS, make it lightweight, stop tracking each and every thing, remove some less used ... moreAnd hence, why we vote with our wallet. They don't care to listen, so it's the consumer's right to do so.
potato4k, 03 Apr 2026There's probably a good reason nobody's using them anymore. Even Sharp dropped it. I... moreAgreed, but if that's the case, why would they push LCDs for larger displays and penny pinch on OLEDs for smartphones and watches? Besides, it's ironic that Samsung pushes QLEDs, as they were marketing their glass-substrate OLEDs as "flagship grade".
Having both options all electronics is better than monopolising on one type of display technology for each item.
What a load of rubbish!
Samsung actually manufactures its own RAM modules, but prefers to sell them at a premium price to competitors or for use in AI junk.
Instead, they prefer to buy cheap goods from a few Chinese low-cost manufacturers.
Exactly the same applies to the OLED screens and the UFS memory chips.
They prefer to use their production facilities for components for the new, completely useless and unnecessary AI data centres.
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2026Nah LCD is vastly inferior at any level.Eh, I can think of a few extreme examples... But yes, OLED panels are generally superior to their LCD counterparts.
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2026"This has been your daily dose of Chinese misinformation. Thank you for your attention!"This is my daily dose of reality and fact. 1+ 10 Pro has a Samsung display, and 1+13 has a BoE display. The BoE display is 2 classes better in every way.
Go cry somewhere else.
Clean your OS, make it lightweight, stop tracking each and every thing, remove some less used features, slow down AI progress by 2-3 years?
Make it like Redmi 2 Prime which worked lag free with 2 GB RAM?
Ahh... who am I talking to? As if the industry would listen to me...
kdss, 03 Apr 2026My phone has a BoE display, my previous one had a Samsung display. When I used the phone with ... more"This has been your daily dose of Chinese misinformation. Thank you for your attention!"
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2026Depends on the Lcd junior Nah LCD is vastly inferior at any level.
Minu, 03 Apr 2026Unironically, LG displays have never suffered from green line issues so far. There's a re... moreMy phone has a BoE display, my previous one had a Samsung display. When I used the phone with the Samsung display for a long time, it felt like I had needles stuck in my eyes. With the BoE display, there is no eye fatigue even after hours of using the phone.
Minu, 03 Apr 2026The LG G3-G7, Nokia 8, HTC 10 to U11, and the Sharp Aquos R managed with 1440p QLED displays, ... moreThere's probably a good reason nobody's using them anymore. Even Sharp dropped it. I'm guessing the cost and yield. They were great when OLED were still on the expensive side. But now, OLED panels are a dime a dozen.
potato4k, 03 Apr 2026True for larger panels, but I don't think we're there yet for smaller panels with de... moreThe LG G3-G7, Nokia 8, HTC 10 to U11, and the Sharp Aquos R managed with 1440p QLED displays, though.
Minu, 03 Apr 2026Not the case for all LCDs, though. A quantum dot LCD (QLED) mitigates typical LCD shortcoming... moreTrue for larger panels, but I don't think we're there yet for smaller panels with denser pixels for mobiles. And when we factor in cost, LTPS OLED are a dime a dozen nowadays.
kdss, 02 Apr 2026It would be best for Samsung to ask Chinese manufacturers to make the whole phone for them. Th... moreSamsung relies excessively on Wingtech (an Original Design Manufacturer, a company that designs and manufactures products for another company) across its mobile devices, something common with other brands.
The problem here is that Samsung demands a large amount of profit from the final product, despite having no involvement with their phones directly. This is also the current trend with a plethora of cheaper phones from Chinese brands that offer poor value for money, which steers away potential buyers from them. Hence the reason why I suggest everyone vote with their wallet.
potato4k, 03 Apr 2026OLED has won consumers in vivid colors and contrast. When consumers go to a store, an LCD phon... moreNot the case for all LCDs, though.
A quantum dot LCD (QLED) mitigates typical LCD shortcomings, such as washed-out colours, greyish blacks, and poor colour reproduction, at the cost of temporary image retention. There should be a reason why Samsung insists on QLEDs instead of their in-house OLEDs, shouldn't there?