Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 540

Samsung Xclipse 540

The Samsung Xclipse 540 GPU is a GPU integrated in the Samsung Exynos 1580 SoC integrated graphics card (iGPU). Samsung does not publish any details about the graphics unit, but it is probably based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture like the older Xclipse 920 and not yet the current RDNA 3 architecture of the Xclipse 940. The GPU integrates 2 WGPs (4 CUs) and is said to be 37% faster with 20% less power consumption (probably compared to the Xclipse 530). In our benchmarks, the Xclipse 540 is even slightly faster (41%) and is on a par with the older Adreno 660 (Snapdragon 868).

The Exynos 1580 and therefore also the Xclipse 540 GPU is manufactured by Samsung using the 4 nm process (Samsung 4LPP).

Xclipse 500 Series

Xclipse 540 @ 1.3 GHz
Xclipse 530 compare @ 1.3 GHz
Xclipse 550 compare @ 1.3 GHz
iGPUIntegrated Graphics
Core Speed1300 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryno
Man. Technology4 nm
Date of Announcement28.03.2024
CPU in Xclipse 540GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 15808 x 1950 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 654     avg: 675     median: 675 (2%)     max: 696 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4975     avg: 5132     median: 5184 (3%)     max: 5237 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1362     avg: 1418     median: 1404 (2%)     max: 1488 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
8224 Points (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
9540 Points (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 10.5     median: 9.9 (4%)     max: 12 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 22     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (4%)     max: 26 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 53     avg: 58     median: 56 (4%)     max: 65 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 46     avg: 47     median: 47 (4%)     max: 48 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 81     avg: 83.7     median: 85 (2%)     max: 85 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 109     avg: 110.7     median: 111 (5%)     max: 112 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 153     avg: 155     median: 156 (1%)     max: 156 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 255258     avg: 257707     median: 257707 (18%)     max: 260156 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
77.5 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU OpenCL
min: 6476     avg: 6660     median: 6659.5 (2%)     max: 6843 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.7 - Geekbench 6.7.1 GPU Vulkan
min: 6711     avg: 6783     median: 6783 (2%)     max: 6855 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.04     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (3%)     max: 7.88 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
57 58.9 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra
47.3 57.5 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
29.7 58.9 ~ 44 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high
29.6 39.8 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
118.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5852
PUBG Mobile4435
Dead Trigger 2118.6
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2





1
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.35
log 31. 18:44:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 31 Aug 2026 05:34:52 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13068 +0.012s ... 0.04s

#8 got single benchmarks 13068 +0.008s ... 0.048s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.291s ... 0.339s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.339s

#12 Got 9 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.342s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.342s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.343s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.358s

#16 return log +0.361s ... 0.72s

Notebook reviews with Samsung Xclipse 540 graphics card

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ in review

Samsung Galaxy S10 FE+ Review: Large Android tablet with price focus and fabulous run times

The Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus is designed to be ideal for students and casual users. In addition to the 13.1-inch display, the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ tablet impresses with the included S Pen and AI functions. We take a look at whether the FE model is the better buy compared to the Galaxy Tab S10 Plus in this review.
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 13.1", 664 g
Loads of innovations in the premium mid-range - Samsung Galaxy A56 5G review

Loads of innovations in the premium mid-range - Samsung Galaxy A56 5G review

The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G has been given a new design, longer updates, new Awesome Intelligence as well as a brand-new Exynos processor. This and many more features make it one of the best mid-range smartphones of 2025.
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 6.7", 198 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Is it NFL material or did it peak in high school? Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE Review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE is much cheaper than any other Tab S model. It doesn't have an OLED screen and also cuts some corners in terms of performance. Find out if Samsung's pared-down tablet is still worthwhile here.
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 10.9", 497 g

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+: Samsung Exynos 1580, 13.10", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: Samsung Exynos 1580, 10.90", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G: Samsung Exynos 1580, 6.70", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy A56

   » Samsung Galaxy A56 to get One UI 8 soon

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+: Samsung Exynos 1580, 13.10", 0.7 kg
   » Verdict on the Galaxy Tab S10 FE Plus: Fantastic battery life

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G: Samsung Exynos 1580, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A56 5G: The king of the mid-range may be faltering

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE: Samsung Exynos 1580, 10.90", 0.5 kg
   » Does Samsung really like its fans? The Galaxy Tab S10 FE casts doubts

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G: Samsung Exynos 1580, 6.70", 0.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy A56 leak reveals mid-range smartphone with fresh design and four colors

   » Samsung Galaxy A smartphones in 2025: Galaxy A56, A36, A26 and A16 in comparison

Google LogoAdd as a preferred source on Google
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 3

Xclipse 960 *
Adreno 825 *
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU *
A19 GPU *
A19 Pro 5-Core GPU *
A18 Pro GPU *
Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750
DXT-48-1536 *
A18 GPU *
UHD Graphics 730
A12Z Bionic GPU *
A12X Bionic GPU *
A17 Pro GPU *
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC16 *
Immortalis-G925 MC12 *
Immortalis-G925 MC11 *
Adreno 750 *
Xclipse 950 *
Xclipse 940 *
Adreno 740 *
Immortalis-G720 MP12 *
Immortalis-G715 MP11 *
A16 GPU 5-Core *
A19 4-Core GPU *
Adreno 725 *
Adreno 722 *
Mali-G720 MP8 *
Mali-G720 MP7 *
Adreno 735 *
A15 GPU 5-Core *
A16 GPU 4-Core *
Adreno 732 *
Adreno 730 *
Mali-G715 MP7 *
Mali-G615 MP6 *
Adreno 720 *
Mali-G710 MP10 *
A15 GPU 4-Core *
A14 Bionic GPU *
Maleoon 935 *
Maleoon 935A *
Maleoon 920 *
Maleoon 920A *
Xclipse 920 *
Adreno 660 *
Mali-G78 MP24 *
Mali-G710 MP7 *
Mali-G78 MP22 *
A13 Bionic GPU *
A12 Bionic GPU *
Adreno 650 *
Mali-G78 MP20 *
Mali-G78 MP14 *
A11 Bionic GPU *
A10X Fusion GPU *
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Class 4

Class 5

Class 6

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-02-18)