User Experience for Event Registration

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Elad Rosanski

    Co-Founder & CEO at Xtag (Badge Printing | Lead Retrieval | Sessions Check-In) | Podcast Host

    7,182 followers

    If your brand is hosting an event, your reputation starts at the door. Not on stage. In the check-in line. Most attendees decide in the first 5 minutes if your event feels premium or chaotic. They do not need a feedback form for that. They feel it in their body. Just give it a thought for a second. Two events. Same industry. Same level of speakers. Same sponsors. In one event, people arrive and find: • A long, slow line • Confusing signage • Staff that looks stressed and unsure • Printers failing, badges missing, names spelled wrong You can feel the energy drop before the event even starts. In the other event, people arrive and: • Know exactly where to go • Get their badge in seconds • See calm staff who look ready • Feel like someone actually planned their arrival, not only the keynote Same content. Completely different brand feeling. The industry loves to talk about stage design, LED screens, activations and party venues. All of that is important. But if check-in feels like a mess, this is what people will tell their friends later. If you want your brand to feel serious, professional, and worth the trip, start here: • Treat check-in as something you plan, not something you fix the night before • Give your registration partner a clear brief and real ownership • Test everything the day before, not at 8:00 am with a line outside • Plan for failure: extra printers, backup badges, backup internet (or use Xtag so internet is not an issue you need to worry about) Your brand is not only your logo on the badge. It is how people feel in the first 5 minutes with that badge. You want people to talk about the content, the meetings and the deals. Help them forget the check-in ever existed. Because check-in should not be a story at all. If it is messy, it becomes the only story people talk about. Bad for your reputation and an easy way to lose money. #eventprofs #eventtech #events #inpersonevents #xtag

  • View profile for Paul English

    Best known as cofounder of Kayak.com, Paul has now started and sold six companies and has also created five nonprofits. Paul has also just written his first book -- “The Meeting Book”.

    21,205 followers

    The most important thing a product manager can do with a new product is to run frequent usability testing, to see what blockers you have in your product that cause it not to be used. Most important rule of usability testing is that once you state the task to the person taking the test, you let them know that you won't be answering any questions during the test. All you will say is "what are you thinking". It is important to writhe in pain as your users get totally lost in your product. Only by feeling that pain do you prioritize fixing all of those problems. In our recent usability testing of BVS event invitation system https://partyclick.com (led by Kate Tyshchenko 🇺🇦), we found errors like this: a) Users had no idea of all of the controls hidden behind a simple gear icon. We need to better expose important controls. b) We have a mechanism where the party host can message all of the guests, e.g., to tell them about what to bring, where to park, etc. But hosts did not know if this would send one message with everyone copied (usually a bad idea) or individual messages per guest. They also didn't know if the message would come from the host, or, from PartyClick. c) When hosts wanted to check on the RSVPs we have received so far, we have a GUEST RESPONSES button, but the way we designed this, it looks like a table header, not a button. We'll fix all of these issues, and then test again. Rinse and repeat until you have no usability issues with your product. It is always more vital that you perfect the most common user paths through your product than adding more features. Stay tuned for more updates from PartyClick.com, and please try us out for your next event!

  • View profile for Maanas Mediratta

    Building Self-learning, ROI-obsessed AI Agents for event organisers to capture and monetise event audiences | Passionate to help the world achieve the SDGs | IIT |Techstars’22

    7,163 followers

    We tested 300 event registration flows and found insane results. What we did - Select 300 events with minimum 200 event attendees [Total attendees in events selected: 1.2 million] - We ran automations for registartion workflows. AI agent visiting pages. Each event was visited by an AI agent that was trained to act like someone that fit theevent attendee profile - Asked it to rate 3 things for every session it did 1. Personalisation: Visit the page 2 times. Do arbitrary actions and see if the next interaction was personalised that many event registration funnels are riddled with long forms, errors 2. Ease: Number of clicks and ability to figure out a path to become a paid / free attendee 3. Attraction: How compelled were you to attend the event. Results - Average score out of 10 - we logged every run and asked 3 different AI systems to rate on each of the above 1. Personalisation: 1.2: 285 out of 300 had no personalisation. Same message and same flow every time I visit 2. Ease: 5.8: 71 events needed over 10 min clicks to complete registrations; 42 events had errors on lead forms not loading or sumitting!!!! 3. Attraction: 7.9: Information is generic with information for specific needs buried in specific pages Event websites collect an enormous amount of behavioural information. You can see when someone browses sessions in the same topic track, reads multiple speaker bios, revisits the pricing page, or searches for venue details. Those signals tell you where a potential attendee is in their decision process. But in most funnels, nothing happens with that information. The system simply continues sending the same reminders to everyone, hoping that urgency will eventually push people to register. The drop-off most likely happens during evaluation, when someone is trying to answer practical questions such as: Is this event actually relevant to my role? Which sessions are worth my time? Does the ticket justify the cost? Do I understand the logistics well enough to commit? If those questions remain unresolved, people obviously leave because the decision still feels incomplete. And that's exactly why nurture systems matter. They allow teams to respond to the signals attendees are already giving rather than treating every visitor the same. If someone: Keeps exploring the agenda, guide them toward the sessions most relevant to their role. Revisits the pricing page, make the pass options easier to understand. Looks at venue information, answer the logistics questions before they become a blocker. Small interventions like these can move people from exploration to decision. We recently wrote a deeper breakdown on how event teams can build simple nurture systems that respond to real attendee behaviour rather than sending identical reminders to everyone. The full article is linked in the comments.

  • View profile for Ramya Bhagirathi Subramanian

    Design @ Enmacc | Alum of UW Seattle | Ethical & Inclusive Design Advocate

    5,209 followers

    Ever stood at a self-checkout kiosk, holding a single banana 🍌… ...only to face a dozen steps, weird menus, and a “call for assistance” button? All you wanted was to pay and leave. But instead, the system felt like a maze. That’s what happens when we skip user flows. 48. Create a user flow UX terms can feel confusing, even for designers. People often use the terms 'user journey' and 'user flow' interchangeably. But they’re not the same. 🗺️ The user journey is like a full road trip: it includes gas stations, scenic views, traffic jams, and even bathroom breaks. It tells the story of how a user feels through the entire experience. 🧭 The user flow, on the other hand, is the GPS. It focuses solely on how users navigate a digital interface. It maps out Key decisions, Actions, and Alternate paths and edge cases all before a single pixel is designed. This is what makes user flows incredibly powerful. ✅ Clear to everyone, from product managers to developers ✅ Helps spot friction early ✅ Ensures interface logic is solid before UI design starts ✅ Prevents feature bloat and dead ends 💡 At Smarten Spaces, I designed an event registration system where users could register not just themselves, but also invited guests. Sounds simple, right? Well… users: 😐Registered, unregistered, and re-registered (sometimes too many times) 🥴Hit participant caps mid-process 🤨Needed to cancel just their guest, not themselves 😥Didn’t know their final status This wasn’t just about designing a pretty confirmation screen. It required crafting a detailed user flow with multiple decision points: 🔹What happens when the max participant limit is reached? 🔹What if a user tries to modify their registration more than 5 times? 🔹What if they want to cancel just one guest? Mapping this flow early meant I could preempt these edge cases and bake them right into the UX. In reality, it might be impossible to document each of these, especially in a fast-paced startup environment, but I tried to incorporate them into the design. Design isn’t just about the happy path. It’s about designing every path. #UXDesign #DesignThinking #ProductDesign #UserExperience #PurposeDrivenDesign #InclusiveDesign #UXForAll #HumanCenteredDesign #UniversalPrinciplesOfUX #PortfolioDesign P.S. I’m reading Universal Principles of UX by Irene Pereyra and applying its 100 strategies to refine my portfolio as an exercise to sharpen my design skills during my job hunt.

Explore categories