Telecommunications Engineering Wireless Systems

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Muhammad Umar Kamran (PMP®)

    Core CS/PS Monitoring | NOC Transmission & Operations | PMP® | NEBOSH HSE | NRS I

    7,827 followers

    A Complete Overview of Telecom Infrastructure – From Tower to Core 1. Base Transceiver Station (BTS) – The Foundation The BTS site is the first point of contact for mobile users and includes three essential subsystems: A. Power System Ensures 24/7 operation through: • Grid Power (primary source, stepped down via transformers) • Diesel Generator (backup for outages) • Backup Batteries (DC power during failures) • ATS (Automatic Transfer Switch) (automates switching between power sources) • Power Supply Control Cabinet (converts AC to DC) • DCDU (DC Distribution Unit – powers BBUs, RRUs, etc.) B. Radio Access Network (RAN) Enables wireless access and signal processing: • RF Antennas (4G/5G communication interface) • AISG (remotely adjusts antenna tilt and alignment) • Jumper Cables (connect RRUs to antennas) • RRU (Remote Radio Unit) – manages RF signal processing • BBU (Baseband Unit) – handles digital signal processing and traffic control C. Transmission System Links BTS to the core network: • Microwave Antennas (wireless backhaul) • ODU/IDU (Outdoor & Indoor Units – convert and process microwave signals) • IF Cable (connects ODU to IDU) • Router (routes and manages data traffic) 2. Transmission & Transport Network Transports data between access points and core: • Access Network: Connects mobile devices and IoT via radio towers and fiber • Transport Network: Aggregates and transports traffic using: • Microwave Links • Optical Fiber • DWDM (Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing) for high-bandwidth transmission 3. Core Network – The Brain of the System Responsible for data switching, routing, and service control: • Mobile Core (EPC/5GC): Handles mobility, authentication, and session management • IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem): Supports VoIP, video calls, and messaging • PCRF/PCF: Policy and charging control • HSS/UDM: Subscriber database and identity management • Gateways (SGW, PGW/UPF): Connect mobile users to external networks 4. Service & Application Layer Where services are hosted and managed: • Data Centers: Host platforms for: • Billing & Charging • Content Delivery (VoD, streaming) • Security & Firewalls • Network Slicing & Cloud Platforms • Edge Computing: Brings processing closer to users for low latency 5. Network Operations & Management Ensures performance, reliability, and optimization: • NOC (Network Operations Center): Central monitoring and fault resolution • OSS/BSS Systems: Support operations and business functions • EMS/NMS: Element and network-level management tools • AI/ML: Used for predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and optimization Common Physical Components Throughout the Network • Fiber Optics / Patch Cords • CPRI/eCPRI Links (for fronthaul between RRU & BBU) • Ethernet Switches • Racks & Cabinets • GPS/Clock Synchronization Equipment This ecosystem enables seamless voice, data, and video services across billions of connected devices globally.

  • View profile for Manuel Sanchez Renedo, Ph.D.

    Senior Digital Payload Architect

    5,619 followers

    𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗙𝗣𝗚𝗔? In RF systems, beamforming is often designed and validated in simulation. Array factors, steering angles, sidelobes… everything looks perfect on MATLAB or Python plots. But the real question is: 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲? Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) provides a powerful bridge between theory and reality. By closing the loop between digital algorithms and physical hardware, it becomes possible to validate beamforming behavior under realistic constraints such as quantization, timing, update rates, and real-time control. In this setup, a digital beamforming algorithm runs on a Lattice Semiconductor 𝗖𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘂𝘀𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗡𝗫 𝗙𝗣𝗚𝗔. Beamforming weights are updated dynamically via UART, and the resulting 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘆 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗲 using Digilent R-2R DACs and an oscilloscope, either in polar form (XY mode) or in Cartesian coordinates. This enables real-time visualization of beam steering and beam sweep effects, long before integrating an RF front-end or an antenna array. In this demo, the FPGA implements a 𝘄𝗮𝘃𝗲𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝗺𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿, a 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗮𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 (𝗗𝗕𝗙𝗡), and 𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗹𝗴𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗺𝘀 to visualize the array factor using low-resolution DACs (8-bit). A Chebyshev amplitude taper is applied, resulting in sidelobe levels of −20 dB. This kind of hardware-in-the-loop approach is already widely used in control, automotive, and radar systems, and it is becoming increasingly relevant for 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝗥𝗙 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘆𝘀, 𝘄𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻��, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱𝘀. For those exploring HIL, MathWorks provides a detailed introduction, Rohde & Schwarz explains how to generate realistic radar signals in an HIL environment, and the IEEE paper below presents a practical example of FPGA-based digital beamforming using HIL with MATLAB-driven weight updates. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗜𝘀 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲-𝗶𝗻-𝘁𝗵𝗲-𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗽 (𝗛𝗜𝗟)? 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀, 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗱 https://lnkd.in/eeCxsbE8 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗿 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗽 (𝗛𝗜𝗟) 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 https://lnkd.in/eHKAdFFz 𝗥𝗙 𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘆 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗙𝗣𝗚𝗔 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲-𝗶𝗻-𝘁𝗵𝗲-𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗽 https://lnkd.in/e9rpXNtJ #FPGA #DSP #RF #Wireless #Antenna

  • View profile for Tr. Amit Asha Anand 🦋, An Honorary Doctorate in Management

    A Child of(आशा, प्रकृति, धरती)| TEDxGatewy Scholar | IIT Madras Alumnus | Educator & Collaborator (IITB Trust Lab, RAIT, KJSIEIT, NMIMS, CSIE, VJTI, Ciena) | Mental Health Advocate | Poet, Storyteller & Solo Backpacker |

    9,299 followers

    Scientists successfully transmitted electricity through air using ultrasonic sound waves and laser beams. Finland is positioning itself at the forefront of a wireless energy revolution, with researchers from the University of Helsinki and the University of Oulu pioneering methods to move electricity without physical cables. One of the most striking developments involves using high-intensity ultrasonic sound waves to create invisible pathways through the air, effectively guiding electrical sparks along a controlled route. While currently in the experimental phase, this 'acoustic wire' technology could eventually enable contactless electrical connections and smart interfaces that function entirely without plugs or traditional wiring. Beyond sound-guided energy, Finnish innovation is also leveraging light and radio frequencies to solve complex power challenges. The private sector is developing 'power-by-light' systems that utilize high-powered lasers to transmit electricity to remote receivers, providing critical galvanic isolation for hazardous environments like nuclear plants and high-voltage stations. Simultaneously, advancements in radio-frequency harvesting are turning ambient waves into 'Wi-Fi for power,' potentially eliminating the need for millions of disposable batteries in low-power IoT sensors. Together, these technologies signal a shift toward a more flexible, cable-free infrastructure for global industry. source: University of Helsink. Wireless Electricity Transmission: Breakthroughs in Acoustic and Laser-Based Power. University of Helsinki News.

  • View profile for BEN YACOUB AHMED ABDELHAK

    ENGINEER IN NATIONAL FREQUENCY AGENCY

    1,160 followers

    🚀Most Important Questions in Telecom 🔴 What does Target RSL mean? Target RSL is the ideal received signal power (dBm) a microwave link must have to ensure stable data transfer and avoid dropouts. In wireless networks, if power is lifeblood, RSL is the pulse that keeps it alive 🟠 What is the IF Cable? Cable carrying intermediate frequency (70-140 MHz) signals and DC power between indoor and outdoor units in microwave systems. Cables may be hidden, but their role is never silent. 🟡 What are Fiber Cables used for? Used for high-speed fronthaul, backhaul, and long-distance links, providing high bandwidth, low latency, and immunity to interference. Fiber is the nervous system of digital infrastructure. 🟢 What is Adaptive Modulation (AM)? Technique that dynamically changes modulation scheme based on signal quality to maximize throughput and maintain link stability. Adaptive modulation keeps networks smart in a noisy world. 🔵 What is BER (Bit Error Rate)? The ratio of incorrectly received bits to total bits sent a critical measure of link quality and reliability. Even one wrong bit can break the message. 🟣 What is LOS (Line of Sight)? An unobstructed direct path between antennas; essential for microwave links to avoid signal blockage and degradation. Microwave communication only works when it can see its partner. 🟤 What is Alignment in microwave? Precise adjustment of antenna direction (azimuth and elevation) to achieve optimal signal reception and minimize losses. Good alignment isn't guesswork-it's precision engineering. ⚫ What is XPIC? Technology that uses two orthogonal polarizations on the same frequency, doubling link capacity by cancelling cross-polar interference. XPIC lets us talk twice as fast-on the same road. ⚪ What is Signal Strength (SS)? Measured power level of the received signal (in dBm), critical for ensuring the receiver can decode the signal properly. Strong signal, strong connection 🟠 What is SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio)? Ratio between signal power and noise floor higher SNR allows better data quality and faster speeds. The magic lies in separating signal from noise. 🟢 What is Rx Sensitivity? The minimum signal level a receiver can successfully decode, influencing coverage and device performance. A sensitive receiver hears what others miss 🟣What is Diversity? Using multiple antennas or frequencies to reduce signal fading and improve connection reliability. Diversity is a survival tool in telecom. ⚫ What is MIMO? Multiple antennas send and receive multiple data streams simultaneously, increasing throughput and spectral efficiency. MIMO is the engine behind 5G speed. 🔴 What is Fading? Signal weakening caused by environmental factors like terrain, movement, or weather; mitigated by diversity and adaptive coding. Fading reminds us even strong signals can lose their way. 🟡 What is Interference? Unwanted overlapping signals that degrade communication quality and cause connection issues.

  • View profile for Sergio Rivera Cuevas

    RAN & RF Engineer ● 5G | LTE | Open RAN ● Driving Network Performance & Innovation with Data Science & ML

    7,260 followers

    Beamforming: A Key Enabler of 5G Performance — 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝗲-𝘀𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 Beamforming is revolutionizing wireless communication by enabling base stations to direct their signals precisely toward individual users, rather than broadcasting energy in all directions. Why does it matter? In legacy LTE systems, limited antenna counts (e.g., 4 antennas) made it difficult to control the shape and direction of transmitted signals. This led to: 🔻Wasted energy in non-target directions. 🔻High interference between users. 🔻Limited SINR (Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio) Enter Beamforming with 5G: With large antenna arrays, 5G gNodeBs can dynamically adjust the phase and amplitude of signals at each antenna element, allowing: ⬆️ Sharper beams directed at specific users. ⬆️ Reduced interference from neighboring cells. ⬆️ Improved SINR, boosting throughput and reliability. Multi-User MIMO (MU-MIMO) Beamforming also enables simultaneous communication with multiple users using the same time and frequency resources, as long as the beams don’t interfere with each other. This dramatically improves: ● Spectral efficiency. ● Cell capacity. ● User experience, especially in dense deployments. Beamforming it’s a foundational technology that makes high-capacity, low-latency 5G networks possible. 📎 Related content: Article: 5G Beamforming & Massive MIMO. https://lnkd.in/eGKMj9-4 Post: Beam management in 5G. https://lnkd.in/eynDcPMG #5G #MassiveMIMO #Beamforming

  • View profile for Rahul Kaundal

    Technical Lead

    33,470 followers

    Network Optimization Process - 4G/5G Network Optimization is vital for ensuring that 4G/5G wireless networks deliver the best possible performance, efficiency, and user experience. By continuously fine-tuning network parameters and configurations, operators can meet the evolving demands of users, applications, and regulatory requirements, ultimately driving the success and competitiveness of their network deployments. Below outlined the high level steps involved in optimizing 4G/5G network, from the activation of a new site to ensuring Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are met: 1. New Site On Air: Install and activate the new site hardware and software. Ensure connectivity to the core network. 2. Single Site Verification: Perform initial checks to verify site functionality. Check hardware and software configuration. Check planned parameters & configuration are implemented or not Verify connectivity and basic services. Check for any BTS related alarms including VSWR 3. Cluster Readiness: Ensure multiple sites once verified separately will also be checked in a cluster Verify synchronization with neighboring sites. Check handover and inter-site mobility. Ensure inter-technology movement parameters are set appropriately 4. RF Optimization: Conduct Radio Frequency (RF) optimization to enhance coverage and capacity. Adjust antenna tilt and azimuth. Optimize soft parameters including transmit power levels. Mitigate interference issues. 5. Service Test and Parameter Tuning: Conduct service testing to ensure all services are functioning correctly. Adjust network parameters for optimal performance. Tune Quality of Service (QoS) parameters. Verify signaling and data flow. 6. KPI Performance Met: Monitor Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as accessibility, mobility, retainability, integrity Analyze KPI data to ensure they meet predefined thresholds. Fine-tune network settings (including physical and soft parameters) if KPIs are not met. Continuously monitor and optimize network performance. Throughout this process, it's important to iterate and revisit steps as necessary, especially as network traffic patterns change or new challenges arise. Additionally, collaboration between different teams such as RF engineering, transport, core network, and service assurance is crucial for effective network optimization. Note – Above key steps may change slightly as per different vendors/telcos. To learn more about the network optimization end to end, refer to the course - https://lnkd.in/e9TpSHzF https://lnkd.in/evFaDyGr

    Network Optimization Process

    https://www.youtube.com/

  • View profile for Nitin Gupta

    5G, ORAN & AI/ML Architect | 3GPP | O-RAN Alliance | AI-RAN Alliance | 6G Researcher | Wireless Technology Leader | Based in Delhi

    42,602 followers

    🔬 Deep Dive: 5G NR OFDM Signal Analysis at 3.5 GHz Just analyzed some fascinating 5G New Radio waveforms showing the intricate beauty of modern wireless communications. Here's what caught my attention: Key Observations: -30 kHz subcarrier spacing - optimized for the 3.5 GHz mid-band spectrum -64-QAM constellation showing excellent signal quality with tight clustering -Clean OFDM symbol structure across 4 symbols in this 140μs frame -Robust frequency spectrum spanning ~60 MHz bandwidth What This Tells Us: The I/Q time domain shows the characteristic OFDM noise-like appearance, while the amplitude envelope reveals the cyclic prefix structure. The phase plot's consistent green indicates stable carrier synchronization - critical for maintaining the high data rates 5G promises. The constellation diagram is particularly impressive - those tightly clustered 64-QAM points demonstrate minimal channel impairments and excellent SNR performance. This is exactly what we need for delivering multi-gigabit speeds reliably. Industry Impact: As we continue 5G deployments globally, analyzing signal quality at this granular level helps optimize network performance and user experience. The 3.5 GHz band remains the workhorse of 5G mid-band deployments worldwide. What aspects of 5G signal processing do you find most intriguing? Drop your thoughts below! 📡 Join my free 5G whatsapp learning channel : https://lnkd.in/gerTY-kr #5G #Telecommunications #SignalProcessing #OFDM #WirelessTechnology #RF #Engineering

  • View profile for Pradeep Khannur

    Solution Director - HCLTech, Senior Member IEEE, M.Sc. (IC Design) NTU, Singapore. RF & mmWave and AMS Circuits & System Design/PSV Specialist

    9,036 followers

    RF Basics: RF Transmission Line Discontinuties RF transmission line discontinuities occur when the transmission line's characteristic impedance changes, causing signal reflections. These changes can be caused by various factors, including changes in conductor width, the presence of bends, or the connection of other components. Causes and Effects: Changes in Impedance: The most common cause of discontinuities is a change in the transmission line's impedance. This happens when the physical characteristics of the line, like width or height, are altered. Bends and Junctions: Bends and junctions in transmission lines also introduce discontinuities, as the magnetic and electric fields are disturbed, leading to changes in inductance and capacitance. Component Connections: Connecting components like capacitors, inductors, or resistors to a transmission line creates discontinuities because these elements introduce their own impedance and reactance. Reflections: When a signal encounters a discontinuity, it can be reflected back towards the source, interfering with the intended signal transmission. Parasitics: Discontinuities can introduce parasitic capacitances and inductances, affecting the performance of the circuit. Types of Discontinuities: Stepped Impedance: A change in the transmission line's impedance, often caused by a sudden change in conductor width. Bends: 90-degree bends in a transmission line introduce discontinuities by altering the magnetic and electric fields. Gaps and Slits: Gaps or slits in the transmission line can also create discontinuities, often used in tuning or coupling circuits. Connectors and Vias: Connecting to other components or making via connections through a PCB introduces discontinuities. Modeling and Analysis: Equivalent Circuits: Discontinuities can be modeled using equivalent circuits, allowing for the analysis of their effects on signal propagation. Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR): TDR is a technique used to measure the reflection characteristics of discontinuities by sending a pulse down the transmission line and observing the reflected signal. S-Parameters: S-parameters are used to characterize the scattering properties of discontinuities, allowing for the evaluation of their impact on signal transmission. Minimizing Discontinuities: Controlled Impedance: Maintaining a consistent characteristic impedance along the transmission line is crucial for minimizing reflections. Optimized Layout: Careful layout design can minimize the effects of discontinuities, such as using smooth transitions and avoiding sharp bends. Matching Networks: Matching networks can be used to reduce the impedance mismatch at discontinuities, improving signal transmission. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • View profile for Aale Muhammad

    PhD Researcher in Electrical Engineering | RF & Antenna Design Specialist | Advancing Wireless Systems, EMI/EMC Integrity & Sustainable Technologies

    5,172 followers

    𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒀𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑺𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝑾𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝑺𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒔: After hours of tuning return loss plots, debugging phase shifts, and trying to center the S11 trace, something strange happened, my own reflection showed up in the Smith Chart. It was no metaphor. The laminated chart actually reflected me. And that’s when I realized that sometimes, the mismatch isn’t in the circuit, it’s in us!! 1. Reflection Coefficient & Return Loss: - The core parameter is: -> γ = (Z_in − Z_0)/(Z_in + Z_0) - Return Loss: -> RL = −20 × log₁₀|γ| → (values below −10 dB indicate good matching) -> VSWR = (1 + |γ|)/(1 − |γ|) → (when VSWR > 2, mismatch grows exponentially) 2. Matching Networks and Real-World Limitations: - Ideal L-section or Pi-networks may not hold in reality. - Small shifts in dielectric constant ε_r, parasitic capacitance from nearby objects (e.g. your hand) or enclosure proximity can alter the impedance match. - At 5.8 GHz, a patch antenna can be detuned by 200 MHz due to thermal cycling and board warping despite matching simulations. 3. Fabrication & Material Imperfections: - PCB tolerances, soldering misalignment, copper migration, all can deviate Z_in. - Even micro-via placements affect trace impedance. - A real case: a 24 GHz board failed EMC tests because environmental copper drift pushed the S11 out of bounds. 4. Smith Chart as a Diagnostic Tool: - Every point on the chart holds physical meaning. - It’s not just a plotting tool, it tells us what’s wrong: → Peripheral loops = excessive reactance or stub mismatch → Erratic jumps = unstable feedlines or thermal inconsistency - In high-power systems, local heating alters substrate ε_r, which shifts resonance curves on the chart dynamically. This is often observed in GaN-based PA modules. 5. Real-Time Smith Chart Anomalies in Industry Applications: - In practical deployments of phased array systems at Ka-band frequencies (~30 GHz), engineers observed fluctuating S11 traces in anechoic chamber testing due to unintended interaction with metallic mounts and nearby instrumentation cables. These parasitic elements altered impedance and caused reflected waves to skew the measured return loss. - Satellite payload teams at LEO platform integrators have reported frequency detuning of up to 250 MHz when spacecraft undergo thermal-vacuum testing. The mismatch becomes visible as a shift in Smith Chart plots caused by dielectric changes in multilayer antenna substrates under temperature stress. - In automotive radar systems at 77 GHz, minor deformations in bumper shape due to temperature or assembly variance lead to beam distortion and impedance mismatch, which reflect as loops or disjointed arcs on the Smith Chart. These signatures are used as real-time indicators for structural conformity during QA procedures. #WillSmithChart #RFEngineering #SmithChartHumor #MicrowaveLab #AntennaDesign #S11 #VSWR #ReturnLoss #EMDesign #PhDResearch #MismatchEnergy

  • View profile for Shivam Wadkar

    Intern at Scaler AI Labs | Quantum Global Summer School ’25 | CSE ’26 | IBM Qiskit Advocate | AI/ML & Quantum Systems

    1,762 followers

    India just crossed a major milestone in the race for quantum-secure communication — and it's not science fiction anymore. DRDO & IIT Delhi have successfully demonstrated Quantum Entanglement-Based Free-Space Secure Communication — over 1 km using an optical link on campus. Here’s why these matters: 1) Entangled photons were used to create secure cryptographic keys 2) No optical fiber needed — it worked over free space. 3) Achieved ~240 bits/sec secure key rate. 4) Quantum Bit Error Rate was below 7%. So, what’s the big deal? 1) It proves that we can build secure communication systems without needing underground cables — perfect for difficult terrains, defense zones, or remote areas. 2) Even if someone tries to intercept the message, the quantum state changes — making the intrusion detectable. 3) It’s another step toward building the Quantum Internet in India. The work was led by Prof. Bhaskar Kanseri’s team at IIT Delhi and supported by DRDO under its “Centres of Excellence” initiative. #QuantumComputing #QuantumCommunication #DRDO #IITDelhi #QuantumIndia #QuantumSecurity #Photonics #Research #QuantumInternet

Explore categories