Skills-First Strategies are Cultural Strategies
I took this in 2018 at Tokyo's Meiji-jingu Shinto shrine.

Skills-First Strategies are Cultural Strategies

I'll start the second edition of Skills Work! with this core belief of mine: Skills-first isn’t just strategy. It’s culture. Every successful skills initiative I’ve been involved with has one thing in common: a company culture that sees talent as core to how the business operates. Without that cultural foundation, even the best skills platforms or credentials end up as check-the-box programs that don’t move the needle.

That’s why this edition of Skills Work! tackles two things:

  1. Building a common language so future editions of this newsletter feel like a shared conversation, not a monologue or diatribe from just me.
  2. Exploring culture as the accelerant because no skills-first strategy truly evolves without cultural alignment at its core.

It’s important to note that the common language we create here doesn’t have to match what your company uses. By defining these terms together, we can stay on the same page as a community. And by talking openly about how culture either propels or stalls skills initiatives, we can start to uncover practical ways to create environments where skills-first thinking actually thrives. Defining our shared language isn’t just semantics, it’s how we align culture, strategy, and execution in a skills-first organization.

Defining a Shared Language for Skills-First Work

Before we explore how culture drives skills-first strategies, let’s get on the same page with some shared language. These are working definitions I’ve used and that we can use as a community to keep our conversations clear. If you’ve got better terms or examples, drop them in the comments. I’d love to refine this list with your input. Let’s not make this static. Think of it as a living glossary that we’ll refine together in future editions (my linguist daughter would be proud of me for using “living glossary”). 

Core Terms

  • Skill = The ability to use one's knowledge effectively and readily in job performance.
  • Skill adjacency = Skills that are related and can support lateral movement or rapid upskilling.
  • Skill portability = The degree to which a skill is transferable between roles, departments, or industries.
  • Skill vitality = The relevancy and timeliness of a skill relative to current business needs or market demands.
  • Skill depth v. breadth = Definitions for specialization versus versatility in skill development.
  • Verifiable skill = The ability to confirm through digital records (badge, electronic transcript, etc.) the accuracy of completion, and other pertinent information through a machine-readable format.

Emerging Terms

  • Skills flux = When current and emerging skills coexist, requiring employees to balance what they know with what they’re still learning.
  • Skills instability = Rapid change in job roles as technology and market shifts create new demands and sometimes entirely new roles.

Credentials and Records

  • Credential = Proof of a milestone or qualification (degree, certification, diploma).
  • Micro-credential = A smaller, validated skill or set of skills that can stack toward a larger credential.
  • Badge = A digital representation of a skill, competency, or learning milestone.
  • Learning & Employment Record (LER) = A digital, portable record of learning and work experiences.
  • Digital wallet = A place to store and share LERs and related career information.

Other Useful Terms

  • Capability = A set of tasks that a person can perform at a specific level of documented proficiency. 
  • Attribute = A quality, character, or characteristic ascribed to someone.
  • Competency = The knowledge and ability to do something at a level of proficiency defined by a validating entity or organization (can be your company).
  • Validation = The process of confirming a skill through assessment, observation, or performance evidence.
  • Job family = A group of related roles that share skills and competencies.
  • Skills library = A structured, consistent way to describe skills so they can be measured and matched across systems.

Why Company Culture Matters in a Skills-First Strategy

Many organizations approach skills-first strategies through the lens of culture — and for good reason. Culture sets the foundation for how a company values talent growth and development. In every strategy I’ve built, aligning to culture has been the first step. Technology and processes can enable a skills ecosystem, but without cultural alignment, they may fall flat. Simply launching a credential or platform and telling employees to “go upskill themselves” doesn’t work. Companies that intentionally value talent development are better positioned to create a true culture of learning, one where access to growth is seen as core to how the business operates. That belief fuels four cultural conditions that form the foundation of any skills-first organization, each operating as a two-way exchange between employer and employee.

1. Belief. Skills strategies only thrive when employees believe in their potential and leaders believe in their people. 

  • For the employee: They believe in themselves and what they can do. They believe that their opportunities should be based on their collection of skills, experiences, and attributes, and not only a credential.  “I believe I can manage an entire store one day.” “I believe I can help protect my company from cybersecurity threats.” “I believe I can learn a new skill.” “I believe my past doesn’t determine my future.” 
  • For the employer: Leadership believes in its people, especially people who come from post-traditional backgrounds. They believe their people are their greatest strength. They believe that encouraging career mobility is the right thing to do and they believe that no one wants or thrives in a dead-end job. They also believe that there are a variety of ways to demonstrate knowledge and skills outside of a traditional college degree. They believe that experience on the frontline is just as valuable as experience in the corporate environment. 

2. Visibility. When opportunities and talent are visible, careers grow faster and organizations deploy talent more effectively.

  • For the employee: In the simplest of terms, employees need access to see what is possible. They need to see career opportunities and pathways early on and be able to “try on” different careers (i.e., through job tryout simulations, job shadowing, mentoring, etc.). “I know that there is a pathway for everyone at my company, and I know which one is right for me.”
  • For the employer: Leaders need visibility into their internal and dynamic talent pool. They need to envision a talent marketplace that enables the business to see and connect with internal talent. “I know that I can easily see internal talent through my company’s marketplace and even be informed about potential matches to roles I’m creating.”

3. Access. Removing barriers to learning and mobility ensures skills growth is achievable, not aspirational.

  • For the employee: Employees must be able to access education and skilling opportunities without taking on the burden of additional debt or feel too time-constrained with their work and family commitments to upskill or reskill. “My company encourages me to continually update my skills.”
  • For the employer: The company must make mobility accessible to employees at all levels by removing barriers such as minimum experience requirements, degree requirements, and relocation requirements (when possible). It’s not just enough to remove barriers, either. It’s important to build accessible pathways for employees – and sometimes that includes building bridges in the form of “gateway roles” that are designed to help employees transition into new roles.

4. Connection. Strong networks between people and leaders turn skills into opportunities and accelerate internal mobility.

  • For the employee: Employees need to be connected to peers and mentors, and key influencers and leaders across the organization. For example, establish Workplace Groups, Mentor Circles, Virtual Gatherings (Info Sessions) with leaders from business units. Employees need to be connected to the right opportunity at the right time. 
  • For the employer: Leaders need to be able to easily connect with internal talent. The talent marketplace will not only provide visibility into the talent pool, it will also facilitate direct connections between recruiters, hiring managers, and employees. 

Without these four cultural conditions: Belief, Visibility, Access, and Connection (BVAC), skills initiatives risk failing. When BVAC is built into the fabric of the culture, skills development stops being just a vague employee benefit and starts becoming part of how the work gets done, which benefits both the business and the workforce.

Let’s don’t let the conversation about cultural alignment stop here. How is your company weaving BVAC into its culture? Or are you leveraging culture in another manner? Have you thought about the correlation between your company’s culture and its talent development practice? Drop a comment or message me directly. Your insights will help shape future editions and, together, we’ll keep refining what a skills-first organization looks like in practice.

How about the term “Skill Penetrance?” When I was practicing as a geneticist, we used a term called allele “penetrance” to describe how pervasive a trait was in a population. (Think, what percent of a population has blue eyes? That value would be the Penetrance of blue eyes within the population) Similarly, with skills, we can get a measurement of how pervasive a skill is within an organization. This, effectively, could allow for skills (in the company’s “skills library”) to be assigned a numerical weight. This weight, can then be used for a number of rank-dependent functions. For example, if a skill had a low Penetrance value within an organization, a hiring manager could weigh it higher when screening that skill so that they can secure for that skill and thus unlock more capabilities with the hire. In the hiring process, It seems that skills are often screened for based on a binary criteria (either the applicant has the skill or not). With penatrance, skill weights can be assigned based on the need of that skill within a company. I imagine that if all skills were cataloged with Penetrance values, AI tools can use skill data (after some reinforcement learning) in a functional way to serve the business’s initiatives.

Like
Reply

Great to see skills-first strategies framed as cultural strategies. In our work with organisations adopting AI, we’ve learned that building capability is inseparable from shaping mindsets and behaviours. You can train people on new tools, but without a shared narrative and psychological safety to practise and challenge the old ways, capability uplift won’t stick. Treating skills programmes as culture change and embracing literacy before mastery, while supporting leaders through the transition, helps teams adopt AI confidently and sustainably.

Shared language that all trainers, assessors and instructors should embrace . I love this glossary!

Thanks for the terms, always great to level set!

BVAC is important. The only record scratch here for me was the “completion” note in the verifiable part. First, because it sounds like completion of knowledge attainment, not verified in application. Secondly, assessments/verifying have always been the hard part of actually being able to use skills data in a meaningful way enterprise-wide. The good news here is that there are more content creators with decent assessments (Pluralsight, others) and AI role play scenarios are starting to assess user performance without bias. Whether AI tools assess well is still debated- but having a sigle source of unbiased assements over self-assessments or manager assessments is helpful to creating useful and fluid enterprise skill maps.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Brandon Carson

Others also viewed

Explore content categories