Gina S Lovasi’s Post

View profile for Gina S Lovasi

Drexel University3K followers

An alternative response: reject the premise Many across Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) are reacting to a narrowing of what counts as a professional degree with attendant higher federal loan allowances. Against a backdrop of actions that has put higher education and public health on the defensive, excluding the MPH and DrPH from a definition of professional degrees seems to add insult to injury. Certainly many are making an argument that we should have the advantages of professional degrees given the importance of work in the field of public health (see https://lnkd.in/eK2SX4gs). However, I found myself wanting more about what the label of "professional" has been used for, and what it is in contrast to. An article from 15 years ago entitled "Research degrees as professional education?" (https://lnkd.in/eDUxmfu2) helped me toward an articulation of what was bothering me: * The distinction of professional versus other worker has elements of autonomy and status that we continue to value, but also a history of exclusion. I think we should be including not excluding practitioners that rely on experiential learning and lived experience. * Professional training is distinguished as highly specialized, leading to a predetermined career path. Public health training fosters knowledge and skills with utility across a variety of future career directions. When I think back to what appealed to me about an MPH versus an MS, I wanted the breadth, the readiness to pursue partnerships across disciplines, the doors open to contribute to projects with impact that I could not yet envision. To be clear, I want to reduce financial barriers to a public health education. But I believe we should lean toward openness and the wide range of career possibilities while doing so. Let's see what we can do to open doors for our students even if those doors do not have the label "professional".

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories