If you ask someone what an Instructional Designer does, you’ll often hear: "Create courses." But the real answer is a lot more interesting. Instructional design involves analyzing business problems, collaborating with experts, designing learning systems, managing projects, improving performance, and measuring results. The learning content people see is only the final product of a much larger process. This graphic highlights the difference between the perception of instructional design and the reality of the work behind it. For those in L&D What part of instructional design do you wish more people understood? #InstructionalDesign #LXD #LearningAndDevelopment #Elearning #WorkplaceLearning
Beyond Course Creation: The Real Work of Instructional Design
More Relevant Posts
-
Great Instructional Designers don’t just build courses… they master three powerful habits. 🐒 Most people think Instructional Design is about tools, slides, and authoring software. It’s not. Great instructional designers consistently practice three core behaviors: 👀 See Beyond Spot learning opportunities others miss and design with long-term learning impact in mind. 🎧 Hear Within Understand learner frustrations, motivations, and hidden barriers before designing learning experiences. 📣 Speak to Transform Deliver knowledge in a way that drives behavior change, engagement, and real performance improvement. When these three abilities come together, learning stops being content delivery and becomes transformation. That’s when instructional design, eLearning design, and learning experience design truly create impact. Which one do you think is the most underrated skill in instructional design today? 👇 #instructionaldesign #elearningdesign #learningexperience #learninganddevelopment #elearning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most instructional design teams are not slow. They’re trapped inside a production model that is. One hour of eLearning still takes months to build. Too many handoffs. Too many review cycles. Too much production work. And instructional designers spend more time formatting slides than designing learning. That model is overdue for replacement. On March 26, we’re hosting a live LinkedIn session: The 10x Instructional Design Team A practical look at how modern learning teams are building faster, thinking deeper, and delivering stronger outcomes without adding headcount. 📅 March 26 ⏰ 1 PM EST / 10 AM PT Register here: https://lnkd.in/gY5SXjPG Stop building learning like it’s 2010. #eLearning #MissionFuelAI #InstructionalDesign #LandD #FreeWebinar #LiveStreaming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
One thing I’ve been thinking about lately in Instructional Design: Good content doesn’t guarantee good learning. Design does. You can have accurate information, detailed explanations, and strong visuals — but if the learning experience isn’t intentionally designed, learners will still disengage. Effective instructional design requires more than just content creation. It involves: Defining clear, measurable learning objectives Structuring content to reduce cognitive overload Aligning activities and assessments with outcomes Designing with the learner’s context and needs in mind Whether in K-12 or corporate training, the principle is the same: Learning experiences should be designed, not just delivered. This shift—from “teaching content” to “designing learning”—is what makes instructional design so powerful. #InstructionalDesign #eLearning #LearningAndDevelopment #LXD #AdultLearning #EdTech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
A common misconception about Instructional Design is that every problem needs a training course. But many workplace problems are not caused by lack of knowledge. Sometimes the real issue lies in processes, tools, or systems. Good Instructional Designers step back and ask a different question: “What performance problem are we actually trying to solve?” Curious to hear from learning professionals — Have you faced situations where training was NOT the right solution? #InstructionalDesign #LearningExperienceDesign #WorkplaceLearning #LearningStrategy #InstructionalDesign #LearningExperienceDesign #WorkplaceLearning #LearningStrategy #Elearning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most people think Instructional Design is about building courses. It’s not. It’s about solving performance problems. As I continue transitioning from teaching into Instructional Design, one thing has become very clear: 👉 The real value of an ID is not the content… 👉 It’s how we apply our thinking. For example, when I design learning, I ask: • What is the actual problem we’re trying to solve? • Is this a knowledge gap… or a performance gap? • What does success look like on the job—not just in training? In my recent eLearning projects, I’ve been applying ID skills by: ✔ Turning complex topics into simple, structured learning paths ✔ Designing scenario-based activities instead of passive content ✔ Using real-world tasks to drive engagement and retention ✔ Aligning every activity with a clear performance outcome Because good learning doesn’t just “inform” people… It changes how they think, act, and perform. That’s the goal. #InstructionalDesign #eLearning #LearningExperienceDesign #CorporateTraining #Upskilling #LXD
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
💡 Designing Training When You’re Not the Expert One of the most important lessons I’ve learned in instructional design is this: You don’t have to be the subject matter expert to create effective training. Our role as learning professionals is different. We translate expertise into learning experiences. When developing training in unfamiliar areas, I focus on a few key principles: • Curiosity first – ask SMEs the “obvious” questions. Often those questions uncover the biggest knowledge gaps for learners. • Structure before content – apply frameworks like ADDIE, Bloom’s Taxonomy, or performance-based learning objectives to organize complex topics. • Focus on the learner’s job – what does someone actually need to do differently after the training? • Partner closely with SMEs – they bring the depth, we bring the learning science. Great training isn’t about proving we know everything. It’s about creating clarity so others can succeed. Sometimes the best instructional designers are the ones willing to say: "Explain it to me like I’m new here." Curious how other L&D professionals approach designing training in unfamiliar domains. What strategies work best for you? #InstructionalDesign #LearningAndDevelopment #AdultLearning #ADDIE #LearningStrategy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I’m still learning about instructional design every day, but one thing has become clear: training isn’t just about delivering information. It’s about creating experiences that help learners actually do something differently. Looking at my own work and what I see in other learning initiatives, I notice how a small shift from slide-heavy lectures to interactive, performance-focused learning can make a huge difference. 💬 Instructional designers and learning experience designers: which change do you think has the biggest impact on learner outcomes: scenario practice, interactive exercises, or feedback loops? #InstructionalDesign #LearningExperienceDesign #eLearning #LearningAndDevelopment #InstructionalDesigner #ScenarioBasedLearning #DigitalLearning #ProfessionalDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Many new instructional designers often get confused between Bloom’s Taxonomy and Merrill’s Principles and honestly, I’ve been there too. Here’s a simple way to look at it: Bloom’s Taxonomy helps you define ‘what learners should achieve’ (the outcome). Merrill’s Principles guide you on ‘how to design the learning experience’ (the journey). One focuses on thinking levels. The other focuses on effective teaching. The real magic happens when you don’t choose between them but combine them. Define clear learning objectives using Bloom, and then design meaningful, engaging learning experiences using Merrill. That’s how you unlock the true potential of instructional design. What do you think?🤔 #InstructionalDesign #LearningDesign #Elearning #LXD #Upskilling
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
It's very interesting to combine the two concepts and apply it. Let's see how it will help curriculum design and the learning outcomes.
Many new instructional designers often get confused between Bloom’s Taxonomy and Merrill’s Principles and honestly, I’ve been there too. Here’s a simple way to look at it: Bloom’s Taxonomy helps you define ‘what learners should achieve’ (the outcome). Merrill’s Principles guide you on ‘how to design the learning experience’ (the journey). One focuses on thinking levels. The other focuses on effective teaching. The real magic happens when you don’t choose between them but combine them. Define clear learning objectives using Bloom, and then design meaningful, engaging learning experiences using Merrill. That’s how you unlock the true potential of instructional design. What do you think?🤔 #InstructionalDesign #LearningDesign #Elearning #LXD #Upskilling
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Absolutely. Education is clearly moving beyond rote memorization toward meaningful application, aligning well with the higher domains of Bloom’s taxonomy. Integration, therefore, becomes not just a strategy but a necessity—connecting concepts across chapters, subjects, and real-life contexts. As teachers, our role is evolving; it is no longer sufficient to rely solely on the textbook as the primary source of knowledge. Instead, we must consciously design learning experiences that encourage students to see relationships, think critically, and apply what they learn. At the same time, this shift, especially under the vision of NEP has created a certain level of uncertainty and “noise” among teachers, students, and parents alike. This gap often leads to confusion and it becomes difficult for any one stakeholder to fully articulate the core intent of these reforms in isolation. What remains important is that we continue to reflect, adapt, and stay aligned with the larger goal: nurturing learners who can think, connect, and apply knowledge meaningfully in an ever-changing world.
Many new instructional designers often get confused between Bloom’s Taxonomy and Merrill’s Principles and honestly, I’ve been there too. Here’s a simple way to look at it: Bloom’s Taxonomy helps you define ‘what learners should achieve’ (the outcome). Merrill’s Principles guide you on ‘how to design the learning experience’ (the journey). One focuses on thinking levels. The other focuses on effective teaching. The real magic happens when you don’t choose between them but combine them. Define clear learning objectives using Bloom, and then design meaningful, engaging learning experiences using Merrill. That’s how you unlock the true potential of instructional design. What do you think?🤔 #InstructionalDesign #LearningDesign #Elearning #LXD #Upskilling
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
More from this author
Explore related topics
- Instructional Design Project Management
- Instructional Design in eLearning
- Learning Experience Design (LXD)
- Instructional Theories and Models
- Instructional Design Essentials
- Learning Design Strategies for Success
- Instructional Design for Online Courses
- How to Design Purposeful Learning Experiences
- Instructional Assessment Methods
- Visual Design in Learning Materials