Just attended the "Publishing with Purpose: Research Integrity & Ethics" webinar by Wiley, a really insightful session for anyone starting their research journey. Here are a few key takeaways that stood out to me: Generative AI can be useful for ideas or overcoming writer’s block, but it must be used ethically. It’s not a substitute for human writing, and its use should always be disclosed. Plagiarism is completely unethical and undermines the credibility of research. Authorship matters, only those who played a substantial, accountable role in the research should be listed as authors. Others can be acknowledged as contributors (with consent). Conflicts of interest should always be disclosed clearly and factually — transparency builds trust. Ethical peer review is the foundation of strong research publishing; it helps improve articles before they reach readers. Grateful for this session, it truly emphasized that integrity is just as important as innovation in research.
Key takeaways from Wiley's webinar on research ethics and integrity
This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
More Relevant Posts
-
📢 I'm happy to share the details of one of my ongoing projects: the Call for Chapters for the upcoming edited volume Engaging with AI in Business: A Virtue Ethics and Human-Centered Approach, to be published by Springer Nature as part of its Issues in Business Ethics series (2027). 🤖 The volume explores how virtue ethics and human-centered AI (HCAI) can guide responsible AI across key business domains — from finance and marketing to HR, governance, and production — aligning technology with human flourishing, organizational purpose, and the common good. 👥 Excited to co-edit this project with Miguel Velasco (CUNEF Universidad) and Jude Chua (Nanyang Technological University Singapore). Thanks to the Facultad de Económicas. Universidad de Navarra, DATAI-Universidad de Navarra, and the Universidad de Navarra for their support. 📚 More details and submission guidelines here: 👉 https://lnkd.in/dxjgVrkv 🌍 Colleagues and researchers interested in these questions are warmly invited to share the call within their networks or submit a proposal for consideration.
👩🏫 Professor Dulce M. Redín, faculty member at Facultad de Económicas. Universidad de Navarra and researcher at DATAI-Universidad de Navarra, is co-editing a new volume titled "Engaging with AI in Business: A Virtue Ethics and Human-Centered Approach", to be published by Springer Nature in 2027 as part of its Issues in Business Ethics series. 📚 Call for Chapters: The edited volume examines how virtue ethics and human-centered AI (HCAI) can guide responsible AI across core business domains. It welcomes chapter proposals that bridge theory and practice to align AI with human flourishing, organizational purpose, and the common good. 👏 👉 For more information 🔗 https://lnkd.in/dxjgVrkv 🔎 Current projects: https://lnkd.in/dqWDMF43
-
👩🏫 Professor Dulce M. Redín, faculty member at Facultad de Económicas. Universidad de Navarra and researcher at DATAI-Universidad de Navarra, is co-editing a new volume titled "Engaging with AI in Business: A Virtue Ethics and Human-Centered Approach", to be published by Springer Nature in 2027 as part of its Issues in Business Ethics series. 📚 Call for Chapters: The edited volume examines how virtue ethics and human-centered AI (HCAI) can guide responsible AI across core business domains. It welcomes chapter proposals that bridge theory and practice to align AI with human flourishing, organizational purpose, and the common good. 👏 👉 For more information 🔗 https://lnkd.in/dxjgVrkv 🔎 Current projects: https://lnkd.in/dqWDMF43
-
⭐ We’re excited to announce the launch of Cambridge Elements in AI Ethics and Society! Elements are short books (20,000-30,000 words), fully peer-reviewed but with a fast turnaround and good online and open options access. We are now accepting proposals! We are open to a wide range of methods, approaches and topics, as long as the work is making a significant and original contribution to the study of AI ethics, governance or social impact. Topics of interest include: -The social impact of AI in important sectors such as health and defence; -Insights from particular methodological approaches such as Confucianism and design theory; -Explanations of key topics such as fairness and explainability. Series Editors: Professor Stephen Cave (Cambridge) and Dr Kerry McInerney (Auckland). For more information, and to download a proposal form, follow this link: https://lnkd.in/e9z3eYU4
-
New paper out together with Jason Branford in Springer Nature's journal 'Philosophy and Technology'. In the paper, we propose an initial, relational ethics approach to epistemic inclusion in the development and application of medical decision support systems. We had been inspired by scholars such as Abeba Birhane and Jan-Christoph Heilinger who criticize current principle-based AI ethics to adopt a relational ethics approach. The notion of epistemic oppression/exclusion (Kristie Dotson) as well as a structural lens as per Iris Marion Young factors in, as well. This one started out as a workshop contribution for the "Relational Ethics in Technological Societies Workshop" at ETH Zürich organized by Margarita Boenig-Liptsin, Kebene Wodajo and Karen Huang. Since then, the material evolved into a beautiful collaboration with Jason, which made the final manuscript so much better, I believe. https://lnkd.in/dAC-K5JA
-
**Navigating Ethics and Authorship in AI-Driven Art** The intersection of artificial intelligence and artistic creation challenges our traditional notions of ethics and authorship. When an artwork emerges from the collaboration between human and machine, questions arise: Who holds the creative ownership? Can an algorithm truly possess authorship, or is it merely an extension of its human programmer’s intent? Ethical considerations extend beyond authorship to the very fabric of creation. AI often learns from vast repositories of human-made art, raising concerns about consent and attribution. The lines blur when AI-generated works echo styles or elements of existing creators without explicit permission, prompting reflection on intellectual property rights and fair use. Moreover, embracing AI in art compels us to reconsider authenticity. Is the value of art diminished or perhaps even enriched when it is mediated by code? These inquiries are not merely legalistic but profoundly philosophical, touching on the nature of creativity itself. As stewards of culture, creators and consumers alike bear responsibility to engage thoughtfully with these evolving dynamics. Transparency, respect for original creators, and a commitment to ethical frameworks will be crucial in shaping a future where AI and human creativity coexist with integrity.
-
-
AIF Insights No. 36 (2025) | Khmer Gatilok and Relational Ethics: A Cultural Lens for AI Morality This essay examines the Khmer ethical system of Gatilok as a culturally grounded framework for AI ethics. Unlike Western approaches that prioritize universal principles, Gatilok emphasizes relational, situational, and long-term moral reasoning rooted in Theravāda Buddhist concepts such as intention (cetanā), karma (kamma), and social harmony (sampheap). Through stories, proverbs, and oral traditions, Gatilok teaches that ethical behavior depends on context, relationships, and the consequences of actions over time. Applying these insights to AI governance highlights the importance of relational accountability, participatory oversight, culturally sensitive datasets, and long-term impact assessments. By integrating Gatilok into AI design and policy, this perspective encourages ethically aware, contextually appropriate, and culturally responsive AI systems that respect local values and foster social cohesion. https://lnkd.in/esTRW2fy
-
EDP Sciences has updated its policy on artificial intelligence and ethics. It outlines responsible use of generative AI across the publishing cycle for authors, reviewers, and editors. Hope other publishers and societies follow suit. From my point of view, the updated policy reinforces a principle that should be universal: peer review has to remain a human-led process. https://lnkd.in/dJuR6A4u #ResponsibleAI #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #PublisherPolicy
-
Kate Crawford: AI’s Leading Ethics Scholar Key Concepts in Kate Crawford's AI Ethics Research AI Ethics The study of moral issues and societal impacts in artificial intelligence development and deployment. As defined by AI Now Institute, it encompasses algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and social justice in AI systems. Learn more about AI Ethics → ... https://lnkd.in/dVygtGth #AIaccountability #AIbias #AIdevelopers #AIDevelopment #AIenvironmentalimpact #AIEthics #AIgovernance #AIinfrastructure #AIlaborpractices #AINowInstitute #AIpolicy #AIregulation #AIResearch #AIsocialimpact #AItransparency #algorithmicbias #ArtificialIntelligence #AtlasofAI #datadiscrimination #dataethics #dataprivacy #datascience #DigitalRights #digitalrightsadvocates #EthicalAI #ethicsscholars #KateCrawford #machinelearningethics #MicrosoftResearch #NewYorkAIresearch #policymakers #researchers #ResponsibleAI #students #surveillancetechnology #techethics #TechPolicy #techprofessionals #technologyethics #TechnologyResearch #USCAnnenbergAIstudies #AIImageArt
-
Kate Crawford: AI’s Leading Ethics Scholar Key Concepts in Kate Crawford's AI Ethics Research AI Ethics The study of moral issues and societal impacts in artificial intelligence development and deployment. As defined by AI Now Institute, it encompasses algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, and social justice in AI systems. Learn more about AI Ethics → ... https://lnkd.in/dVygtGth #AIaccountability #AIbias #AIdevelopers #AIDevelopment #AIenvironmentalimpact #AIEthics #AIgovernance #AIinfrastructure #AIlaborpractices #AINowInstitute #AIpolicy #AIregulation #AIResearch #AIsocialimpact #AItransparency #algorithmicbias #ArtificialIntelligence #AtlasofAI #datadiscrimination #dataethics #dataprivacy #datascience #DigitalRights #digitalrightsadvocates #EthicalAI #ethicsscholars #KateCrawford #machinelearningethics #MicrosoftResearch #NewYorkAIresearch #policymakers #researchers #ResponsibleAI #students #surveillancetechnology #techethics #TechPolicy #techprofessionals #technologyethics #TechnologyResearch #USCAnnenbergAIstudies #AIImageArt
