Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
St Paul, Minnesota, United States
Sign in to view John’s full profile
John can introduce you to 10+ people at Ovative Group
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
2K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with John
John can introduce you to 10+ people at Ovative Group
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with John
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view John’s full profile
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
About
🔏 Privacy…
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Activity
2K followers
-
John Hoffoss shared thisLast week, I commented on Caroline Wong‘s new book. Today, I have the pleasure of hearing from her at the IANS Minneapolis forum! What a happy coincidence and really looking forward to the new book!John Hoffoss shared thisGot my copy of The AI Security Handbook by Caroline Wong. I might be bias but I’m particular fond of chapter 6. “Global exploit prediction models like EPSS offer powerful,scalable insights derived from widespread exploitation telemetry. But not every vulnerability poses the same risk in every environment. This is where the concept of local models becomes essential.” Hard to argue that. And thanks for the props to our very Jay Jacobs & Michael Roytman.
-
John Hoffoss shared thisAnother year, another Distinguished Gentleman’s Ride! In just two weeks, a group of around a hundred Gentlefolk will embark on a tour of the town in a massive motorcycle convoy. This will disrupt Sunday drives as we ride to look great, smile, and wave to the crowd. Our mission is to raise awareness and funds to help fight cancer. I encourage you to join me (https://gfolk.me/jtho) on the ride in any way you can, and remember to stay dapper! (And because it must always be said, fu¢k cancer. 🤘)
-
John Hoffoss shared thisCaroline Wong was one of my favorite SiRAcon keynotes over the years, so I'm looking forward to this book!John Hoffoss shared thisGot my copy of The AI Security Handbook by Caroline Wong. I might be bias but I’m particular fond of chapter 6. “Global exploit prediction models like EPSS offer powerful,scalable insights derived from widespread exploitation telemetry. But not every vulnerability poses the same risk in every environment. This is where the concept of local models becomes essential.” Hard to argue that. And thanks for the props to our very Jay Jacobs & Michael Roytman.
-
John Hoffoss posted thisHave you found any independent analyses of agentic software tools like Claude Cowork or the chatGPT browser? I’m wrestling with lots of requests to use these tools and I can’t find any kind of testing of whether any of the permissions management or restrictions these tools claim to have implemented actually work. If I have to give one of these tools access to a folder via macOS permissions, it has access. No prompt or “OK” button in these program will actually prevent the program from acting without my consent…this has always been the case with software, but once we ask our program to pick its own non-deterministic path of execution and action, what control do I have?
-
John Hoffoss shared thisJoin us as Jack Jones, Doug Hubbard, and Dan Geer – three of SiRA's most popular speakers in our 14 year history – come together to read the tea leaves and help see where we're headed next!John Hoffoss shared thisJoin us for our webinar this month on Jan. 23 at 2 pm ET to hear from Dan Geer, Doug Hubbard, & Jack Jones. Register for free at https://lnkd.in/gy2STTrZ Looking for more content just like this? Sign up for SiRAcon '26 (4/21-4/23 in Boston) while Early-Bird tickets are still available: https://cvent.me/ZZLEEm
-
John Hoffoss shared thisPro-tip for cold connectors: If you’re firing off random LinkedIn requests without a message, at least make sure your profile does the talking. That means a real “About” section, a clear job description, and a sentence or two about what your company actually does. If your title is “Senior Associate VP of BizDev Growth Strategy” at a company called WhizBang.ai, and the only context is a tagline like “We put the cur back in security!”—I’m not clicking accept. If you want meaningful connections, don’t be vague. Be clear about what you’re offering and why you’re reaching out. If being clear doesn't work, then your problem isn’t clarity, you're either missing your target market, or you don't have a market to target.
-
John Hoffoss posted thisPro-tip for cold connectors: If you’re firing off random LinkedIn requests without a message, at least make sure your profile does the talking. That means a real “About” section, a clear job description, and a sentence or two about what your company actually does. If your title is “Senior Associate VP of BizDev Growth Strategy” at a company called WhizBang.ai, and the only context is a tagline like “We put the cur back in security!”—I’m not clicking accept. If you want meaningful connections, don’t be vague. Be clear about what you’re offering and why you’re reaching out. If being clear scares you, the problem probably isn’t clarity.
-
John Hoffoss shared thisMinnesota Spring is upon us and my motorcycle is purring again, breathing in that fresh air and emitting a (usually) soft purr as I put a few miles on. That also means it’s nearly time for The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride — an excuse to get dappered up, flaunt our threads a bit with a few hundred similarly-minded motorcyclists, and give the town a good and respectful showing of what a humongous motorcycle ride looks like. Even better, the DGR is an extension of the Movember Foundation, raising funds for men’s cancer research. My money’s in, as is my annual Ovative Group charitable giving match. If you feel so inclined, I’d be ever so grateful for your contribution and support. (Link in the comments.) And if you’re local, keep your eye around town for a mass of motors on May 18th!
-
John Hoffoss shared thisJoin us to accelerate and tie in your info/tech risk assessment activities into the management of risk across your org. Always a good conference with hallway conversations worth their weight in gold.John Hoffoss shared thisSiRAcon ‘25 is a go! Submit your abstract today @ https://lnkd.in/ghkFnqbk Topics this year include but are not limited to… -Risk Decision Support -Measurement Tips, Tricks, & Tools -Decision Science, Behavioral Science & Data Science -AI in Quantitative Risk Measurement -Risk Measurement Outside of Cyber -How Effective are your Controls? The Call for Presentations closes on Mar. 23, so don’t wait! #SiRAcon25 #ZeroToQuant #QuantERM
-
John Hoffoss liked thisJohn Hoffoss liked thisStudying for the FAIR certification? You *do* need to memorize the FAIR model. When I took mine, there wasn't an app for that. I printed out a blank version of the tree and filled it in with pen and paper until I had it down. So I built the app. There's a learn mode that shows you the full model with all 13 components and their units. When you're ready, switch to practice mode. It clears the tree and gives you a shuffled pool of components to drop into the right spots. Then you assign each one its unit (dollars, probability, or frequency). There's also a definitions quiz that covers all 22 testable items. It's free, runs in your browser, no login required. Hope you find it useful. (ok yeah I used a little bit of Claude Code) 👉 https://lnkd.in/gXJYi4mu
-
John Hoffoss reacted on thisHad a fantastic time at SiraCon 26. Thanks to the Society of Information Risk Analysts (SiRA) board, all the folks involved in making it happen, the other speakers and attendees for the warm welcome and excellent discussions. Having had so many thought-provoking conversations I still have plenty to digest, but two themes that already stand out are the intersection of continuous controls monitoring and quant risk (particularly the importance of control coverage) and the role (and risks) of AI across both domains. Looking forward to continuing the conversations virtually with the community!
-
John Hoffoss liked thisJohn Hoffoss liked thisMost AI risk frameworks only show where risk appears. But governance requires answering two questions: Where is the risk? And how controllable is it? That's why the next evolution of the AI Risk Heatmap is an AI Risk Landscape Map. It evaluates AI risk across three dimensions: • Lifecycle stage • Risk severity • Controllability Because the most dangerous AI risks are not just severe — they are difficult to control. Examples: • External regulatory exposure • Human decision bias • Operational system failures Understanding this difference helps organizations focus governance where it matters most. Responsible AI is not just about safer models. It's about managing risk across the entire decision system. #AIgovernance #ResponsibleAI #AIrisk #EnterpriseAI
-
John Hoffoss reacted on thisJohn Hoffoss reacted on thisMSP came in last place for airport stress — sometimes it's great to just absolutely suck at something 🙋♂️✈️🧳 https://lnkd.in/gJkm3zxK
-
John Hoffoss liked thisJohn Hoffoss liked thisI recently saw Tony Martin-Vegue at SIRACON. He has a new book out: “From Heatmaps to Histograms”. The tagline says it all: A Practical Guide to Cyber Risk Quantification. I highly recommend this book if you are a cybersecurity practitioner interested in risk quantification or if you are curious about how to build or grow a cyber risk quantification program.
Experience & Education
-
Ovative Group
********* *********** ******** * ******* *********** *****
-
*** ********************
********* *********** ******** * **** ******** ********
-
************ ***** **********
********* *******
-
********** ** *********
******** ** ******* * ** ******** ******* undefined
-
View John’s full experience
See their title, tenure and more.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Licenses & Certifications
Volunteer Experience
-
Board Member (Treasurer, Technology Director)
Society of Information Risk Analysts
- Present 16 years 2 months
Science and Technology
🏫 Founding board member of a professional community dedicated to advancing the practice of information risk analysis. Lead operations behind the scenes—handling incorporation, tax filings, nonprofit compliance, banking, and 501(c)(3) recognition—while also owning technical infrastructure as the org’s de facto CTO. Helped turn a shared vision into a functioning, sustainable organization.
-
Co-president & Webmaster
University of Minnesota Habitat for Humanity
- 2 years 1 month
Poverty Alleviation
🏡 Provided leadership and organization for over 100 members. Designed, implemented, and maintained the website and online membership communications. Also worked on numerous Habitat for Humanity job sites coordinating and participating in demolition, framing, and finish carpentry.
💵 Together, the members of the Habitat for Humanity campus chapter at the University of Minnesota raised $25,000 to sponsor the complete remodel of a home in 2001-2002. In the 2002-2003 year, the chapter…🏡 Provided leadership and organization for over 100 members. Designed, implemented, and maintained the website and online membership communications. Also worked on numerous Habitat for Humanity job sites coordinating and participating in demolition, framing, and finish carpentry.
💵 Together, the members of the Habitat for Humanity campus chapter at the University of Minnesota raised $25,000 to sponsor the complete remodel of a home in 2001-2002. In the 2002-2003 year, the chapter raised $50,000 to sponsor the construction of a new home in 2002-2003. -
Head Judge for Minnesota/Iowa State and Midwest Regional Competitions
National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition
- 8 years
Science and Technology
Created challenging cybersecurity and operational technology scenarios while monitoring the progress of the competition, red team activity, and evaluating the performance of each competing team in a fair and unbiased manner.
Recommendations received
5 people have recommended John
Join now to viewView John’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact John directly
Other similar profiles
-
Tyler J. Farrar
Tyler J. Farrar
💼 I enable companies to securely make money and grow, ensuring business resiliency while driving millions in revenue impact.<br><br>🌟 I build and lead high-performing teams, solving complex challenges through collaboration, innovation, and measurable results.<br><br>☁️ I lead a business focused on delivering value through cloud security, governance, and cost optimization, empowering clients to innovate while reducing risk and operational inefficiencies.<br><br>📈 I serve as a GTM Advisor for cybersecurity startups, helping them align security with business goals, accelerate growth, and establish market trust.<br><br>📚 My insights are featured in leading security publications, where I share strategies for aligning risk management with business objectives and redefining the CISO role.<br><br>Let’s connect and make an impact together! 🚀
10K followersSan Francisco Bay Area
Explore more posts
-
Spin.AI
4K followers
The compliance audit notice arrives. You have 10 business days to respond. What follows is a familiar scramble: Legal forwards requirements. Engineering hunts for where regulated data lives. Security reconstructs access histories across dozens of SaaS apps. Everyone discovers the gap between "compliant on paper" and "able to prove it." The problem isn't effort or intent. It's architecture. Industry data shows fewer than 40% of organizations feel confident demonstrating HIPAA compliance, with 20% having no confidence at all. When auditors ask a simple question like "Show me all access changes to PII systems in Q3," teams face weeks of manual work across disconnected tools. Here's why SaaS environments make this exponentially harder: The average company now uses 275+ SaaS applications. Each has its own admin console, roles, and audit logs. Your SSO sees authentication, but the riskiest changes happen within apps via local admins, role modifications, and OAuth grants that never flow back through your IdP. Organizations implementing continuous posture management report cutting audit preparation time by up to 90%, reducing what was once a six-week process to under two weeks. The shift eliminates detective work because evidence is continuously collected, normalized, and mapped to compliance frameworks. The architectural priority: Establish a normalized, continuously updated view of who has access to what across your SaaS environment. This single change compresses compliance timelines because you stop reconstructing evidence from scratch and start filtering an existing system of record. When automation handles evidence collection, compliance becomes collaborative operational hygiene rather than adversarial fire drills. Read the full analysis (link in comments) #ComplianceAutomation #SaaSSecurity #CyberSecurity #HIPAA #SOC2 #GDPR #RiskManagement #InfoSec #GRC #SecurityPosture #CloudSecurity #DataProtection #ComplianceManagement #SecurityLeadership #CISO #SSPM #AuditPrep #EnterpriseSecuri #RegTech #DataGovernance
7
1 Comment -
Koren Wise
Wise Technical Innovations • 5K followers
This was an absolutely amazing article about a company in the news. THIS IS A MUST READ - every bit of it is intriguing. So thankful to the author for these details and the investigation to understand the truth. There is so much here to unpack and so many different manifestations of manipulating various compliance programs and the acquisitions that rely heavily on them. One tactic discussed is calculated named-dropping. It is a tactic for many sales initiatives to rope-in as many reputable entities as possible so they can gain trust. Often it is coupled with claiming endorsements from actual authorities. If they can get one naïve representative to say anything publicly that is all they need… they will magnify it 100 times and it will become their main selling point. Every big company that falls for it adds to the list of names they can drop and smaller companies fall for a hook, line, and sinker.
18
3 Comments -
Trio
9K followers
Your auditor asks for device security documentation from the last 6 months. You have spreadsheets. You have some email threads. You think IT manually checked encryption on devices back in March. You fail that control. This happens to SMBs every audit cycle. The security measures exist, but the documentation does not. SOC 2 compliance is not about having security. It's about proving you had security controls in place consistently over time. Three device security controls auditors always check: ✓ Encrypted storage on all endpoints accessing customer data ✓ Remote wipe capability with execution logs ✓ Access termination records when employees leave Manual tracking fails because humans forget to document. You wipe a lost device in a panic. You offboard an employee quickly. You push a security update during a busy week. None of it gets logged properly. Mobile device management changes this. Trio logs every security action automatically. Device encrypted? Logged. Employee terminated? Access removed and documented. Policy violation? Flagged and recorded. The audit trail builds itself while you focus on actual security work. Compliance is easier when your tools document the work for you. What control documentation takes you the longest to prepare? 👇 #SOC2Compliance #InfoSec #MobileDeviceManagement #AuditReadiness #SMBSecurity #ITAdmin
3
1 Comment -
Ciaran Johnson, CIPP-E, CISSP, C-CISO
Yew-Consulting • 2K followers
The Human Element in Data Breach Exercises I always end tabletop exercises with one question: "How does losing the data make you feel?" The silence that follows is telling. Technical teams shift uncomfortably. Executives check their phones. The conversation suddenly becomes personal. But that is precisely the point. The weekend reports in Ireland about Tusla's 2,184 data breaches since 2019 putting vulnerable children at serious risk shows what happens when data protection becomes merely procedural. We (may) spend hours drilling incident response procedures, refining technical controls, and mapping communication flows. Yet we rarely acknowledge the human cost of data breaches—the weight of failing our customer or our employee, or our colleague who trusted us with their most personal information. When we frame data protection as purely technical, we miss the emotional reality that drives better security behaviours. The marketing manager who suddenly grasps why her customer database matters. The developer who starts seeing PII as people, not records. Great security and data protection cultures are not built on compliance frameworks alone. They are built on teams who genuinely feel responsible for the data they handle. Next time you are designing security or data protection training, do not just focus on what went wrong. Ask how it feels when it does. #DataProtection #SecurityCulture #Security #IncidentResponse #GDPR #Ireland #vISO #Mentor
17
8 Comments -
Justin Leapline
Distilled Security Podcast • 5K followers
I've been watching this space for a long time. And lately, something clicked. Drata launched an AI agent for third-party risk. Diligent launched one promising 80% time savings. Ibex just got ISO 42001 certified for AI ethics. All around the same time. I remember when GRC meant spreadsheets, manual audits, and chasing people for evidence. Now we're talking about AI agents that do the work autonomously. The shift I've been expecting for years is finally here. Faster than most people were ready for. I don't know if 80% time savings is realistic. But I know the direction is right. The teams that figure this out early won't just be more efficient. They'll be untouchable. Full article in the comments 👇 #GRC #CyberSecurity #InfoSec #CISO #SecurityLeadership
3
1 Comment -
Richard Staynings
Cylera • 27K followers
Inotiv Inc. said a cybersecurity incident earlier this month has disrupted certain business operations at the company. The West Lafayette, Indiana-based company, a contract research organization for drug discovery and development, said it became aware of the incident on Aug. 8. A preliminary investigation determined that a hacker had gained unauthorized access and encrypted some company systems, the company said in a regulatory filing. Inotiv took steps to contain the incident, including engaging outside cybersecurity experts and restricting access to certain of its systems. https://lnkd.in/gDuFqX-2
5
-
Thinkcloud (M) Sdn Bhd
113 followers
How CASB Helps Stop Insider Data Leakage Security teams are no longer managing only known applications. New AI tools, browser-based apps, and vibe-coded cloud apps can appear faster than traditional review processes can keep up. That’s why AI-Powered CASB matters. Key challenges organizations face today: *Employees sharing sensitive files *Upload monitoring *DLP integration Subject: * Not all Data Breaches Come From Hackers *The insider Threat Nobody Talks About iboss is helping organizations gain visibility and control across modern cloud app activity — including emerging AI-driven applications. Not all data breaches come from hackers. Sometimes, sensitive company data is exposed by: Employees sharing files to personal cloud storage Unauthorized SaaS applications Misconfigured sharing permissions Accidental uploads from unmanaged devices With hybrid work becoming the norm, insider-related data exposure is now one of the biggest challenges for security teams. How can organizations gain better visibility and control across cloud applications without impacting user productivity? This is where iboss CASB helps: ✔ Monitor cloud application usage ✔ Detect risky user activities ✔ Prevent sensitive data leakage ✔ Enforce security policies across SaaS platforms ✔ Support Zero Trust and compliance initiatives Whether your organization is using: -Microsoft 365 -Google Workspace -Dropbox or other cloud applications, having visibility into user behavior is becoming critical for modern cybersecurity operations. Organizations today need more than just perimeter security — they need visibility inside the cloud. Cyber security - change to How CASB Helps Stop Insider Data Leakage? Everything you need to know about - change to Not All Data Breaches Come From Hackers www.thinkcloud.com.my - Change to Explore smarter security with ThinkCloud today. #CyberSecurity #CASB #CloudSecurity #DataProtection #SaaSSecurity #ZeroTrust #InformationSecurity #HybridWork #DLP #iboss #ThinkCloud #CyberDefense
4
-
Ayman Totounji
Cynexlink • 6K followers
Your pen test passed technical review. Your examiner still issued an MRA. Here's why: Technical soundness and regulatory compliance aren't the same measurement. Examiners automatically escalate three specific gaps to MRA status regardless of your CVSS scores or vulnerability counts. If you can't prove your compliance-required controls actually work, findings escalate. I'm reviewing documentation for institutions preparing for upcoming exams. I'll tell you exactly what would trigger an MRA in your current testing and what documentation closes the gap before your examiner arrives. Limited slots available - link in comments What would your examiner escalate if they reviewed your documentation tomorrow? #CyberSecurity #PenetrationTesting #RegulatoryCompliance #FFIEC #BankingCompliance
1
1 Comment -
RiskProNet International
614 followers
Policy language is like a prescription label. Technically accurate. Structurally sound. But most people don’t actually know what it means until a pharmacist explains it. “This clause limits your cyber coverage to on-premise systems.” Translation: “If you’re hacked through your cloud vendor, this policy won’t respond.” “This sublimit applies to pollutant cleanup only.” Translation: “We’ll cover the fire — but not the hazmat that follows it.” Your job isn’t just delivery. It’s decoding. Because your client isn’t just trying to be insured. They’re trying to be prepared. #InsuranceAdvice #RiskTranslation #Preparedness
-
Pravesh Gaonjur
TYLERS • 4K followers
Audits and forensics aren’t witch-hunts to “name the hacker.” They’re how you stop the next breach. A good audit/forensic review will: Expose misconfigurations and control gaps Surface broken processes (people • tech • vendors) Produce a clear timeline to improve response Provide evidence for insurance claims and regulators Demonstrate senior management intent and due diligence One breach costs more—in money, trust, and time—than doing the work properly up front. At Tylers, we turn incidents into hardening plans: fixes, owners, deadlines. Not blame—better security. #CyberSecurity #DigitalTrust #Forensics #Audit #IncidentResponse #Tylers
17
2 Comments -
Brian Plain
Next AI Company LLC • 2K followers
#MA hates it's own laws, is that really true? What is "The Mowbray Integrity Check" is it a forensic auditing metric used to evaluate the data integrity of legal nodes within the system's "Wage Act toolkit", #IamNewHere? #Specifically, I was confused, I thought it monitors digital evidence tied to the statutory authority of the Massachusetts Wage Act (M.G.L. c. 149 § 150), was I incorrect?
-
Nerd Bites
17 followers
Alert fatigue isn’t a tooling problem. It’s an ownership problem. Most SOC teams aren’t short on tools. They’re overwhelmed by alerts and unclear responsibility. When everything is flagged as high risk: -Nothing feels urgent -Context gets lost -Response slows down Adding another tool doesn’t fix this. It usually adds more noise. What actually breaks isn’t detection. -It’s decision-making. -Who owns the alert. -Who decides priority. -Who is accountable when it’s ignored. Until that’s clear, alert volume will always beat automation. How are teams handling this in real environments? #CyberSecurity
2
1 Comment -
One Identity
37K followers
Audit season isn’t the time to realize your identity program has blind spots. We just dropped a practical guide with The Hacker News on how to tighten your IAM posture before compliance teams come calling. From proving least privilege to automating access reviews, these are the tactics that actually hold up under scrutiny. Worth a read if “we’ll get to it later” has been your IAM motto! 👉 https://okt.to/TEcbZ4 #compliance #IAM #identitysecurity #audit
52
-
Steven Molter
IntelliGRC • 2K followers
📢 New Blog Alert! 📢 If only I had a fedora. Then, I would've felt like a true detective! Definitely worth the inevitable hat hair! I loved working on this one. Audit process correlation is one of the more common CMMC / NIST SP 800-171 requirements that I see being approached with a reductionistic PoV! 3.3.5 is not JUST about making sure your logs go into a SIEM! It's about making sure you know HOW to review, analyze, and report on spooky activity including logs or other notifications and ensuring that they don't operate in an isolated or conflictory way. YOUR STUFF NEEDS TO WORK TOGETHER! Hope everyone enjoys this one! Happy Implementing! #cmmc #cui #correlation #soc #msp #esp #incidentresponse #investigation #dod #dfars #IntelliGRC
6
-
Darace Rose
Oppos • 13K followers
The PCI audit process isn’t just about passing a test—it’s a full lifecycle of security validation. It starts with scoping, where your audit boundaries are defined. Then comes a gap analysis to identify weaknesses, followed by a remediation phase where those issues are addressed. Once remediation is complete, a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) performs the official audit. Finally, a detailed report is submitted to your bank or card brand. But PCI compliance doesn’t stop there. Maintaining it means regular checks, updates, and a long-term commitment to securing payment data. https://smpl.is/aa7tv #PCIAudit #PCICompliance #CyberSecurity
2
-
Matt Bruun
SailPoint • 3K followers
Privileged session audits and analysis are your last line of defense. They validate that access controls are working, expose risky actions, and provide accountability to ensure you correct small anomalies before they become major incidents. Even the most advanced PAM and identity security programs can fall short without regular session reviews. Auditing powered by Delinea Iris AI, seamlessly audits sessions, automatically pinpointing risky activities, combining deep visibility with near real-time threat detection. Delinea transforms session auditing to help you eliminate time-consuming manual reviews and analyses so you can focus on what matters: efficient security controls that keep you secure. https://lnkd.in/e8xTWVpC #AISecurity #PAM #Delinea
19
-
Matt Kelly
Strategic editorial leader… • 20K followers
So you’re wondering how to reframe your whole #GRC program to rest upon a foundation of solid #cybersecurity, rather than responding endlessly to more regulatory demands and risk management frameworks? What a coincidence, I moderated a webinar on that topic just the other day, and took lots of notes. Was really struck how much this is a people- and strategy-centered challenge, more than a tech challenge. #compliance #audit #privacy https://lnkd.in/e3y29KZG
17
2 Comments -
Karissa A. Breen (KB)
KBI.Media • 32K followers
Most cybersecurity updates fail before the first slide. Why? Because boards don’t care about tools. They care about outcomes. Joe Cozzupoli @ Cosive gives his 2 cents. Boards don’t want acronyms, heat maps, or a rainbow of red amber green. They want to knowwww..... What does this mean for the business? If your board pack is a dashboard, you’re reporting. If it’s a one pager with scenarios, impact, cost and a clear recommendation. The job isn’t to describe risk. It’s to frame decisions. Strong cyber leaders don’t hide behind data. They give context. They give options. They give an opinion. Cyber risk isn’t technical. It’s commercial. And the board expects you to treat it that way. Take a listen to this interview and PLEASE don't forget to subscribe and follow the show for the latest episodes. 💜 #Vanta
27
2 Comments -
LINEARSTACK
14K followers
Your SIEM screams at 2:14 AM. You roll over. It’s another false positive. Or is it? The weight of “What if I ignore this one?” That’s your real threat surface. As a CISO, your job isn’t just threat detection. It’s threat prioritization. It’s risk translation. It’s boardroom brevity + basement-level visibility. But lately, your stack is a Franken-stack: → EDR that’s noisy → MDR that’s templated → SOC that escalates everything to you anyway Here’s the reality: You didn’t sign up to babysit 3 dashboards at once. You signed up to secure the business. And when every alert becomes your alert You don’t have a security posture. You have a stress posture. That’s where Titan comes in. Real-time correlation across your endpoint, cloud, and network Noise-reduction models built to flag what matters Defense Center that doesn’t pass the buck , it solves the problem 24/7 SOC that knows your context, not just your logs We help CISOs like you breathe between the breaches. No more playing whack-a-mole with alerts. No more reactive firefighting. Just proactive, precision-built defense. Because your sleep should be as secure as your servers. Let’s upgrade your peace of mind: https://zurl.co/uepn4
1
-
Ajay Chandhok
Stratus Cyber • 7K followers
The 9 disciplines every compliance framework tests. Here is the thesis. CMMC, FedRAMP Rev5, and FedRAMP 20x really boils down to the same core operational disciplines. The wording differs. The cadence differs. The evidence format differs. The work is the same. We manage 15+ compliant environments across FedRAMP Rev5, 20X, CMMC, and IL5. We have delivered over 500 ConMon packages. We've lived the pain before we built a platform to help ourselves. Every month, for every client: export scan results from multiple scanners, normalize into one schema, figure out what is new vs remediated vs reopened, reconcile cloud inventory against the spreadsheet, open change tickets that have no linkage to the POA&M items they remediate, chase email approvals, assemble the ConMon package by hand. Then the audit hits. An assessor asks you to trace a change to the POA&M item it remediated. You cannot connect the thread cleanly. The 9 disciplines: 1. Change Management 2. User Access Management 3. Vulnerability Management 4. Continuous Monitoring 5. OSCAL-Based Documentation 6. Asset Inventory 7. Deviation Management 8. Compliance Reporting 9. Incident Response Plus the five Rev5 Balance improvements that bridge Rev5 to 20x: MAS, SCN, ADS, VDR, CCM. We started with an ITSM built on Halo and transformed it into a GRC-ITSM. One platform. One data model. Three frameworks. Assets, issues, changes, approvals, deviations, scans, and reports live in the same system. The relationships between them are not maintained manually. They are the data model. The workflow is the evidence. Starting Monday, we are running a series covering each discipline across CMMC, FedRAMP Rev5, and FedRAMP 20x and also each Rev5 Balance improvement. Each post links to the full article on the site. Post linked in the first comment. Compliance is a byproduct of operations, not a separate workstream.
10
5 Comments
Explore top content on LinkedIn
Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.
View top content