Take a look at this critical analysis on the use of PFHEA in promotions by Anesa Hosein at the Surrey Institute of Education
Have you been applying for PFHEA? Is it linked to your promotion case? Do you think you could have been better supported? In my latest blog post, I critically examine how PFHEA is being used for professorial applications by drawing on my own experience in pursuing PFHEA and a sectoral analysis of 18 universities. I argue that the increasing use of PFHEA as a requirement or indicator for promotion is structurally inequitable, as many institutions lack the infrastructure to support fair access to it. I call upon universities without a PFHEA accreditation framework, and insist on using PFHEA as an indicator or required criteria, to have the following: 📏Mechanism for supporting PFHEA e.g. an allocated mentor 📏Transparent Allocation and Equitable Access to PFHEA funds Where PFHEA is used as a promotion requirement requiring external accreditation, the timeline to achieve PFHEA is largely outside the candidate's control. Hence, promotions should be awarded as soon as the requirement is met, not deferred to the next cycle. Read more in my latest blogpost (and would welcome any thoughts on how this differs/ resonates with your experience). https://lnkd.in/eGF2NH7n