Possible Duplicate:
Convert std::string to const char* or char*
void Foo::bar(const std::string& foobar) {
// ...
const char* foobar2 = (char*)foobar;
// ...
}
That does not work and I get an error during compilation about invalid casting.
Is there some other way to convert std::string to const char*?
Use foobar.c_str().
You might find this link useful: http://www.cppreference.com/wiki/string/start
std::string::c_str() gets you a const char* pointer to a character array that represents the string (null-terminated).
You should not manipulate the data this pointer points to, so if you need to do that, copy the data.
Double edit - doing it in a more C++ fashion
Since it is nicer to avoid the use of raw pointers and arrays where possible, you can also get the data into an std::vector<char>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
std::string str = "Hello";
std::vector<char> cvec(str.begin(), str.end());
// do stuff
}
edit this is more like C since it uses raw pointers and explicitly allocates mem
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
int main()
{
std::string str = "Hello";
char *cptr = new char[str.size()+1]; // +1 to account for \0 byte
std::strncpy(cptr, str.c_str(), str.size());
// do stuff...
delete [] cptr;
}
std::vector, never use new T[].
strncpy and not strcpy?
You're going to get a lot of kinda incorrect answers about str.c_str() here. :) While c_str() is indeed useful, please keep in mind that this will not actually convert the string into a char*, but rather return the contents of the string as a const char*. And this is a big difference!
What's important here is that the pointer you obtain from c_str() is valid only as long as the given string object exists. So this would be terribly wrong:
class Something {
const char* name;
public:
Something(const std::string& pname) {
this->name = pname.c_str(); /* wrong! the pointer will go wrong as the object from the parameter ceases to exist */
}
};
So if you want to convert, as in: create a new value which will be independent of the original std::string, then you'll want to do something like this:
char* convert(const std::string& str) {
char* result = new char[str.length()+1];
strcpy(result,str.c_str());
return result;
}
But still c_str() will be quite enough for you in most cases. Just try to think in terms of objects' time of life.
str.length()+1 because length does not count the null byte.std::vector, never use new T[].
new T[] in place of std::vector<T>, or scoped_ptr/unique_ptr<T[]>. Unless, of course, you're trying to write code that isn't exception-safe, poorly manages its resources, etc...Just because C++ can be low level doesn't mean you can, have to, or will get away with writing poor code.
const char* foobar2 = foobar.c_str();
Notice the const. Otherwise you have to copy it to a char buffer.
const char*, or achar*? Should he use&foobar[0], or astd::vector<char>? We can better answer the question if he asked the goal and not the step. @Richard: I see one that takes aconst char*and avoid*, nothing about achar*anywhere. In which case, as suspected, you just want aconst char*and thereforec_strand not achar*. (@And @Aar: Oh look at that...)