Skip to main content

Questions tagged [unitarity]

In quantum mechanics, a unitary operator satisfies U<sup>†</sup> U = UU<sup>†</sup> = I, where † denotes Hermitean conjugation; such operators then specify Hilbert space automorphisms and preserve state norms, so then probability amplitudes and hence probabilities. Use for conservation of probability questions under unitary state transformations.

1 vote
1 answer
97 views

I am working on a problem about Cutkosky’s cutting rule in Matt D. Schwartz’s Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. The problem asks us to show that the imaginary part of the amplitude is given ...
Jaeok Yi's user avatar
  • 364
2 votes
1 answer
420 views

From wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner%27s_theorem For unitary case $$\langle U \Psi, U \Phi \rangle = \langle \Psi, \Phi \rangle .\tag{1} $$ If I apply the definition of adjoint https://...
orange's user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
0 answers
118 views

Unitary transformations conserve the inner product structure of a set of vectors, they only change the direction of the vectors, i.e. rotate them all in the same way. A unitary transformation $U$ can ...
nougako's user avatar
  • 418
3 votes
1 answer
128 views

The standard Cutkosky rules go as follows: Cut the appropriate propagators (replace them with $(-2\pi i) \delta(p^2-m^2)$). Sum over all cuts. This gives $\operatorname{Im}$ (I am dropping factors ...
CrackedPot's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
73 views

Consider a chiral quasi-primary field in 2D with conformal dimension $h$. Under conformal transformation it transforms as: $$\phi^{'}(z)=(\frac{df}{dz})^{h}\phi(f(z)).$$ For the two point function of ...
Mars's user avatar
  • 523
2 votes
1 answer
227 views

I am reviewing irreducible representations and need some clarifications. Most of what I am writing is based on Schwartz's book, Chapter 8. I will try to use as little group theory as possible, since I ...
Lip's user avatar
  • 381
17 votes
11 answers
3k views

Let me start off by saying that I am a math student (with very little knowledge in physics let alone in quantum mechanics). At the moment I am taking a (first) physics course offered by my university ...
userא0's user avatar
  • 343
4 votes
3 answers
781 views

The way Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are defined, I am unable to form an unitary matrix whose elements are Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. How do I construct a matrix that represents transformation. And ...
GotFried69's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
50 views

In QM the probability is violated when: $\int \rho(\vec r,t)\vec dr\neq 1$ for a quantum mechanical system in an arbitrary state $\psi(\vec r,t)$. In this case we know that $\psi(\vec r,t)$ is the ...
imbAF's user avatar
  • 2,058
3 votes
2 answers
281 views

In the consistent histories formalism of quantum mechanics, one consider as basic objects projective decompositions of the identity (PDI). In the following we write a projector as $\left[\phi\right]:=\...
Ruben Campos Delgado's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
129 views

I have read about the Cutkosky cutting rules and optical theorem when I was studying for theoretical particle physics. I.e. Imaginary part of Greens function is directly correlated to the sum of decay ...
Alexander Haas's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
196 views

In order to rotate the usual 3d vectors (Written as Column vectors), We start with the idea that Rotation perserves lengths, which leads us to the group of $O(3)$. But Reflections also perserve length,...
Falcon's user avatar
  • 11
3 votes
0 answers
107 views

Context For a single channel scattering problem, it is well known that we have to solve the wave function from the Schrodinger equation: \begin{equation} \left( -\frac{1}{2m} \nabla^2 + V(r) \right) \...
Steven Chang's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
193 views

I have a short question about the transformation laws of quantum fields. Although I have come across similar questions, I haven't been able to understand this explicitly. In a QFT, we postulate that ...
IAmConfused's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
192 views

The Lagrangian density of a canonical scalar field is $$ L=-\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\phi)(\partial^\mu\phi)-V(\phi) $$ if we use a $(−,+,+,+)$ sign convention. If the sign of the kinetic term is ...
hao123's user avatar
  • 37

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
38