Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 7, 2014 at 16:29 vote accept jimmyorpheus
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:48 answer added user14972 timeline score: 1
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:46 comment added Thomas Andrews It's generally hard to have fractions if $a\times b = a\times c$ does not imply $b=c$. It's also hard when $a\times b\neq b\times a$. So it is difficult to see how you can come up with a useful theory with cardinal or ordinal numbers.
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:40 comment added Asaf Karagila Take a look at the notion of non-Archimedean fields, one of which is the surreal numbers suggested by @Jair Taylor.
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:35 comment added Jair Taylor Take a look at the surreal numbers. This a framework which you can add, subtract, multiply and divide all sorts of infinite and infinitesimal numbers.
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:34 history edited jimmyorpheus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 54 characters in body
Aug 6, 2014 at 23:28 comment added jimmyorpheus The Enlish Wikipedia article "Cantor's diagonal argument" is not equivalent to the german article "Cantors erstes Diagonalargument". Instead, the English article is equal to the German article "Cantors zweites Diagonalargument" which is about a related but different proof by Cantor. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be an english version of the German article "Cantors erstes Diagonalargument" which is about Cantors proof that the rational numbers are countable.
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:59 history edited Git Gud
Retagged
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:56 comment added user98602 Field of fractions might be of interest to you.
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:55 comment added AlexR I have added the english equivalent link since this sites' language is english; also added number-theory. You might want to add some background to the question so we can see where you are and where this question comes from. ($\pm 0$)
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:51 history edited AlexR CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:48 review First posts
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:49
Aug 6, 2014 at 22:48 history asked jimmyorpheus CC BY-SA 3.0