Samsung Galaxy A37 review - Reader comments

D
AnonD-838133
S7x
10 Apr 2026

This slowdowns are cause of ram shortage,not cause of soc. Putting 6gb of ram in a 350€ phone is insult for customers.

Reply

jiyen235
XNA
10 Apr 2026

Samsung raises the bar for mediocrity yet again 🔥🔥

back during the a32 days i was able to say "yeah this looks about right", but now it just aint it anymore. Not like the competitors are that much better, intentionally choking midrange and lower end phones out so that people are forced to buy more expensive ones.

Reply

?
Anonymous
n}w
10 Apr 2026

This model is still completely unnecessary. If they were to launch the A57 at a reasonable price of €399 to a maximum of €449, the A37 would become completely redundant. Eliminating that model would make the lower price possible.

Reply

?
Anonymous
B4X
10 Apr 2026

At this point the A55 is better, it costs less and also has a micro SD slot

Reply

V
Vans79
Tm%
10 Apr 2026

Thank you Samsung for this year's midrange offers. You and Google did your best to push me to buy refurbished iPhone:))

Reply

E
Eddisson
pqq
10 Apr 2026

This is for people who know the brand name, but don't know differences between specs.

Reply

r
rizki1
KxI
10 Apr 2026

lol how can this be a laggy phone than A36? besides A37 already has UFS 3.1.. good optimization from Wan Yuai.

Reply

R
Rkm
FY0
10 Apr 2026

Three cameras at the rear. Two of them are a paltry 8 MP ultrawide and a 5 MP macro. The audacity to offer this in 2026 for a non entry-level device is just offensive.

Reply

?
Anonymous
Ix1
10 Apr 2026

The Galaxy A series this year is rather boring and overpriced. What a shame. With a deep discount the A57 might be alright, but it's really unattractive at MSRP.

Reply

m
markiz
MNT
10 Apr 2026

Markie, 10 Apr 2026Samsung is done.Nah, this pair will again be the most sold in EU. People in EU are conformists and buy whatever the operator gives them, unless they have a bit more money, then they get iphone.