[next-dev-loop] Fix some papercuts#95153
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Jude Gao <jude.gao@vercel.com>
Contributor
Tests PassedCommit: d24c7df |
Contributor
Stats cancelledCommit: d24c7df |
gaojude
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #95135.
Summary
This fixes a bunch of papercuts I discovered by running this skill repeatedly and analyzing logs:
--wait.mcpprefix was confusing the agent and it was invoking the commands wrong.Test Plan
Harness
I've been running this in an eval that runs a small next project and navigates around it. The eval penalizes the score if the log shows the agent stumbling, waiting unnecessarily, getting errors, etc. This version was most successful so far:
Real Project
I've also tried it with a real project as a part of CC migration skill. It started the browser and later was able to talk via MCP and do edits seemingly without problems. More real testing would be nice — I don't have much experience with skills.