Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewmbenton
Copy link
Collaborator

This is kind of a lazy quick-and-dirty implementation that doesn't attempt to consolidate some duplicate line parsing that we do during migration removal and just sticks a func right in the package that handles file parsing for all engines, even though this line filter only applies to postgresql.

Happy to revise if there's a better place to put this.

Resolves #4065

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. 🔧 golang labels Aug 29, 2025
@atombender
Copy link

Can this please be merged? It's a blocking issue with Postgres 17. @kyleconroy

var lines []string
for s.Scan() {
line := s.Text()
if strings.HasPrefix(line, `\`) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems a little aggressive to remove all lines that begin with \. The following is valid SQL, but would be broken by this fix

SELECT E'
\x61 b c
';

I don't think pg_dump would create such a statement but hand written SQL could.

I would suggest that the fix only exclude lines starting with \restrict and \unrestrict

@j-houston
Copy link

Bump. Can we get this merged?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. 🔧 golang

5 participants