description of an sbt problem with macro paradise

[xeno-by]

review @heathermiller @retronym

[gkossakowski]

Why was this merged without any review?

[heathermiller]

Because the website is not the distribution.

[gkossakowski]

What's the policy for website commits, then?

[heathermiller]

The same policy as we've always had to updating the website (prior to git)-- committers can make updates as they wish. I and lots of the community will read everything and make/suggest changes as necessary.

[gkossakowski]

Ok, thanks for clearing this up. I asked because there's a comment asking for reviews.

[heathermiller]

When writing, it's a lot easier to iterate and make progress this way (i.e. making progress in smallish steps).

I frown upon too much bureaucracy when it comes to writing documentation. It's hard enough to get committers to document, inline, what their addition does. It's a lot harder to get people to write detailed guides like this about their contribution.

[heathermiller]

Yep- I see it. It'll be reviewed when Eugene considers this steady-state (I believe it's close). No worries about keeping track of these reviews-- I got 'em.

[gkossakowski]

Cool. Thanks a lot for all the work on docs! :-)

[heathermiller]

Yep, thanks to @xeno-by for all of the excellent work!