Skip to content

Conversation

@cactter
Copy link
Contributor

@cactter cactter commented Jul 22, 2022

No description provided.

@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Aug 2, 2023

@jsha Is there a reason you would prefer the unsafe blocks as-written, or should this be considered for rebasing + review?

@jsha
Copy link
Collaborator

jsha commented Aug 3, 2023

This is suitable for rebasing + review!

@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Aug 3, 2023

This is suitable for rebasing + review!

Sounds good. Rebased + fixed formatting errors.

@cpu cpu requested review from ctz and jsha August 3, 2023 13:30
@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Aug 3, 2023

I think this change is small enough in scope I'm comfortable merging with one positive review. If there's any additional feedback I will commit to iterating on the unreleased code in main.

@cpu cpu merged commit db40a7b into rustls:main Aug 3, 2023
@cpu
Copy link
Member

cpu commented Aug 3, 2023

Thanks @cactter !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants