information-schema-deadlocks: add the "Begin" step #21061
Conversation
qiancai
added
area/transaction
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/XS
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://cdn.statically.io/img/avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @qiancai, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. The title and description indicate that the primary goal of this PR is to add documentation or logic related to the "Begin" step within the information_schema.deadlocks context. The description also notes that this PR is a translation from a Chinese documentation PR and targets master, v8.5, and v8.1. However, the provided patch content seems unrelated to this stated goal, only adding a single line "This is a test file." to a file named temp.md. I will summarize based on the stated intent from the title/description, but note that the patch content does not reflect this.
Highlights
- Documentation/Logic Update: This pull request intends to add information or code related to the "Begin" step within the
information_schema.deadlocksfeature, likely clarifying its role or usage.
Changelog
- temp.md
- Added a single line of text: "This is a test file."
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
Thank you for your contribution!
I'm reviewing this PR, and there appears to be a significant mismatch between the PR's stated intent and the actual file changes. This is the primary concern with this PR.
- PR Title & Description: "information-schema-deadlocks: add the "Begin" step". This, along with the linked translated PR (information-schema-deadlocks: add the "Begin" step docs-cn#20412), suggests changes related to deadlock information in the information schema.
- Actual Changes: The only modified file is
temp.md, which now contains the line "This is a test file."
This discrepancy makes it difficult to understand the PR's purpose and review it effectively. Could you please clarify:
- Is this PR intended to address the "information-schema-deadlocks" topic? If so, the current changes don't seem to align with that, and the correct files should be updated.
- Or, is the change to
temp.mdthe intended modification (perhaps for testing purposes)? If this is the case, the PR title and description should be updated to accurately reflect this content.
Addressing this confusion is crucial before the PR can be considered for merging.
Separately, I have a minor stylistic suggestion for the content of temp.md if this file is intended to remain.
Style Guide Summary: This review emphasizes clarity and correctness (Style Guide lines 14, 16, 21). The primary feedback regarding the mismatch between the PR's stated intent and its content is crucial for maintaining these standards. The suggestion for temp.md aims to improve file formatting consistency, which aligns with general best practices for readability (Style Guide line 14).
Summary of Findings
- PR Intent Mismatch: The PR's title and description indicate changes related to 'information-schema-deadlocks', but the actual modification is the creation of
temp.mdwith the content "This is a test file.". This fundamental discrepancy needs to be resolved. This is considered a critical issue for the PR's validity. - Missing EOF Newline: The file
temp.mdis missing a newline character at the end of the file. It's a common best practice to include one for better compatibility and diffing.
Merge Readiness
While my review status is 'Comment' in adherence to the project's contribution guidelines (Style Guide line 9: "When you finish the review, you directly add comments to the PR instead of requesting changes to avoid blocking the pull request from being merged."), this PR currently has a critical discrepancy between its stated purpose (related to 'information-schema-deadlocks') and the actual file changes (addition of 'This is a test file.' in temp.md).
It is crucial that this primary issue is clarified and resolved before the PR can be considered for merging. I am unable to approve pull requests, but I strongly recommend addressing this fundamental mismatch. Once resolved, the minor stylistic suggestion for temp.md can also be applied if the file is to be kept.
|
@MyonKeminta: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?