-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 697
tikv: fix the description of write cf short value length (#21036) #21047
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tikv: fix the description of write cf short value length (#21036) #21047
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
As Gemini, I've reviewed this pull request. It's an automated cherry-pick from #21036, primarily focused on improving the TiDB documentation. The core change addresses a minor inaccuracy in the description of how data length affects storage within RocksDB's Column Families (CFs), specifically correcting the threshold for the write CF
.
Highlights
- Documentation Fix: Corrected the description in the RocksDB overview documentation regarding the data length threshold for storing values in the
write CF
. The description now accurately reflects that values with a length 'less than or equal to 255 bytes' are stored in thewrite CF
.
Changelog
- storage-engine/rocksdb-overview.md
- Updated the description of the
write CF
on line 25 to change 'less than 255 bytes' to 'less than or equal to 255 bytes', providing a more precise definition of the short value length threshold.
- Updated the description of the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly updates the description for the write CF
in rocksdb-overview.md
, changing "less than 255 bytes" to "less than or equal to 255 bytes". This is an important clarification for technical accuracy, ensuring users have precise information about data storage thresholds.
The change is clear and directly addresses the issue described. I've also included a minor stylistic suggestion for the updated line to further align it with the documentation style guide.
In this review, I've referred to the following aspects of the style guide:
- Technical Accuracy (Line 16): The core change enhances this.
- Second Person Usage (Line 22): For addressing users.
- Conciseness (Line 24): For avoiding unnecessary words.
Summary of Findings
- Technical Accuracy Improvement: The primary change correctly updates the data length condition for
write CF
from 'less than 255 bytes' to 'less than or equal to 255 bytes', which is crucial for accurate documentation. - Style Guide Adherence: Second Person: A minor suggestion was made to change 'the user writes' to 'you write' to align with the style guide's recommendation (Line 22) of using the second person.
- Style Guide Adherence: Conciseness: A minor suggestion was made to change 'the data length' to 'its length' for better conciseness, following the style guide's advice (Line 24).
Merge Readiness
The pull request makes a valuable correction to the documentation, enhancing its technical accuracy. The suggested stylistic changes are minor and can be incorporated at the author's discretion. Overall, the change is in good shape.
Please note that I am an AI assistant and cannot approve pull requests. Ensure that this change is reviewed and approved by the appropriate maintainers before merging.
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #21036
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions (in Chinese).
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?