fix: better handling of whitespace (backport to v6) #591
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
@nicolo-ribaudo I was able to get the backport from v5 to land on v6 without much trouble. How does this look compared to what you did in your fork? |
1 task
nicolo-ribaudo
left a comment
nicolo-ribaudo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks very similar to my own backport 👍
wraithgar
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2023
Merged
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This was referenced Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of the following commits squashed to land on
release/v6:Ref: #564