Skip to content

Conversation

@mikoop79
Copy link
Owner

Add a strategic proposal document to justify hiring two dedicated backend engineers for test coverage and pipeline reliability improvements.

This document outlines a 12-month initiative to move from a "Fast + Risky" release state to a "Safe + Fast" one. It addresses critical issues like inconsistent test coverage, fragmented deployment processes, and legacy code, detailing SMART KPIs, roles for the new hires, and a change management strategy to reduce hotfixes and increase developer efficiency.


Open in Cursor Open in Web

Co-authored-by: mikejrcoops <mikejrcoops@gmail.com>
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
Learn more about Cursor Agents

@mikoop79 mikoop79 marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2025 03:39
Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is being reviewed by Cursor Bugbot

Details

You are on the Bugbot Free tier. On this plan, Bugbot will review limited PRs each billing cycle.

To receive Bugbot reviews on all of your PRs, visit the Cursor dashboard to activate Pro and start your 14-day free trial.

✅ **Comprehensive documentation** that developers actively maintain
✅ **Standardised processes** for scoping, development, and debugging

This initiative transforms our backend from a source of constant firefighting into a reliable platform that enables rapid, safe feature delivery. No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Future Timeline Mismatch

The 12-month initiative's timeline references Q1-Q4 2025, but with the current date being September 23, 2025, most of these quarters have already passed. This makes the proposed future milestones inconsistent and confusing for readers.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants