Skip to content

lint rule: check for branching expressions #7287

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 25, 2025
Merged

lint rule: check for branching expressions #7287

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
afa6eed
lint rule: check for branching expressions
dmadisetti Nov 24, 2025
23e3a25
generated: code gen for lint rules
dmadisetti Nov 24, 2025
2675ab5
typing: missing signatures
dmadisetti Nov 24, 2025
cc0d8db
comment: fix examples and allow common side effects
dmadisetti Nov 24, 2025
a834b43
typo: folling -> following
dmadisetti Nov 24, 2025
4297375
comment: allow general function calls
dmadisetti Nov 25, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
typo: folling -> following
  • Loading branch information
@dmadisetti
dmadisetti committed Nov 24, 2025
commit a834b43318dacd738a4590b6fd740dfe42ff4fa9
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions examples/outputs/conditional_output.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ def _(checkbox):
@app.cell(hide_code=True)
def _(mo):
mo.md("""
The folling cell would **not** show anything, since an if statement does not
have a value:
The following cell would **not** show anything, since an if statement does
not have a value:

```python
# Intentionally demonstrates that if statements don't display expressions
Expand Down
Loading