Workflow Health — 2026-07-01

Executive read: Multiple skill review workflows are stuck with 28/33 pending items (85%) unchanged from previous run. High volumes of unresolved pull request review comments and submissions require immediate workflow redesign or clearer acceptance criteria.

Legend:

• Status: 🟩 accepted · 🟥 rejected · 🟨 pending · ⬜ unknown
• Lifecycle health: 🟢 resolving · 🟡 in flight · 🟠 aging · 🔴 stuck · ⚪ underdefined

🔴 Action Items

1. Stuck pending items — 33 items pending (71% of all outcomes). Most critical:

   • Issue safe-outputs: pre-flight workflow scope check + full-branch allowed_files validation #42585 — Referenced by 4 workflows; pending 18+ minutes
   • Issue fix(eslint-factory): require-parseInt-radix false negative on radix 0/undefined #42581 — Referenced by 4 workflows; pending 18+ minutes
   • Issue Promote errortypeassertion and execcommandwithoutcontext to blocking CI gate #42580 — Referenced by 3 workflows; pending 30+ minutes
   • Issue [refactor] Semantic function clustering: consolidate duplicate compileSchema; codebase otherwise well-organized #42587 — Semantic Function Refactoring pending 46 minutes with zero engagement
   • Issue [reliability] Daily Reliability Review - 2026-06-30 #42586 — Daily Reliability Review pending 91+ minutes with zero engagement

2. Skill reviewer workflows stuck — Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, Impeccable Skills Reviewer, and PR Code Quality Reviewer show:

   • Multiple create_pull_request_review_comment outputs with no URLs (unable to track)
   • Unresolved submit_pull_request_review outcomes on same PRs
   • Review definitions need clarification: when is a review "accepted" vs "still pending"?

3. Daily report workflows underdefined — Daily Sentrux Report and Daily Observability Report show only unknown outcomes:

   • Acceptance/rejection criteria for discussion creation are unclear
   • Evaluator lacks signal to classify these items
   • Recommend dedicated evaluators or clearer success metrics

4. Zero-touch rate at 0% — All accepted items (2 items) required follow-up edits. Quality of generated outputs needs review, especially for skill reviewer workflows.

5. Weak evidence signals — 2 of 46 items (4.3%) evaluated with only existence checks (target_exists_only). While low, note this contributes to accepted_weak count.

network:
  allowed:
    - defaults
    - "awmgmcpg"

📊 Measured by Outcome Collector · 20.7 AIC · ⌖ 3.52 AIC · ⊞ 6.8K

• expires on Jul 7, 2026, 5:05 PM UTC-08:00