Skip to content

Describe deps and cli "Aliases" better #669

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

adityaathalye
Copy link
Contributor

The paragraph trailed off at "These Clojure CLI subprocesses use data which can be read from aliases:". Now a cross-reference explains "subprocesses".

The section also disambiguates the top level keyword :deps from the built in alias :deps. The information exists elsewhere in the reference page, but was not obvious in the Aliases section.

Finally, the section surfaces the fact that :deps provides additional programs for the user's perusal. Alias name printing being a handy one.

The paragraph trailed off at "These Clojure CLI subprocesses use data which
can be read from aliases:". Now a cross-reference explains "subprocesses".

The section also disambiguates the top level keyword `:deps` from the built
in alias `:deps`. The information exists elsewhere in the reference page,
but was not obvious in the Aliases section.

Finally, the section surfaces the fact that `:deps` provides additional
programs for the user's perusal. Alias name printing being a handy one.

nb. I've signed the CA. Ref: my github user `adityaathalye` listed at
https://clojure.org/dev/contributors
@puredanger
Copy link
Member

Thanks, this is a good catch. I am in the process of overhauling this reference as a companion to the new https://clojure.org/reference/deps_edn page and rather than merge here, I think that discussion is either covered there and will also be updated in the new page.

@puredanger puredanger closed this Jan 2, 2024
@adityaathalye
Copy link
Contributor Author

Acknowledged. Cheers, and happy new year!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants