chore: auto-format YAML and Markdown files #473
Conversation
aaronsteers
requested review from
aldogonzalez8
and removed request for
Copilot
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request applies several cosmetic adjustments and formatting improvements across multiple GitHub workflow files, documentation, and configuration files. It includes whitespace fixes, job name corrections, and indentation cleanups in workflows; a new step is added in the semantic PR check workflow to validate that the pull request title does not contain forbidden phrases; documentation now highlights the use of Poe tasks for common actions; and task commands in the configuration are updated to consistently run within the Poetry environment. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Runner as GitHub Actions Runner
participant Validator as Semantic PR Validator
participant PR as Pull Request Data
Runner->>Validator: Trigger validate_pr_title job
Validator->>PR: Retrieve PR title
Validator->>Validator: Convert title to lowercase and check for "do not merge"
alt Forbidden phrase found
Validator-->>Runner: Fail the job with an error message
else No forbidden phrase
Validator-->>Runner: Continue workflow execution
end
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Would you like to include these reviewers and labels in the final merge, wdyt? Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://cdn.statically.io/img/avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
debug_manifest/README.md (2)
5-7: Improve Instruction Clarity in VSCode Debugger Setup
The updated instructions at the beginning of the file are now more readable. Would you consider double-checking that the spacing and wording here match our style used in other documentation? wdyt?
51-53: Enhance Instructional Punctuation
A static analysis note suggests adding a comma after “Alternatively” (in the line that discusses switching the default interpreter) to improve clarity. Would you consider making this small refinement? wdyt?🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~52-~52: Consider adding a comma after ‘Alternatively’ for more clarity.
Context: ...), to wire the CDK env to the debugger. Alternatively you can switch the default interpreter ...(RB_LY_COMMA)
.github/workflows/slash_command_dispatch.yml (1)
54-54: Improved Formatting with an Added Blank Line
The inserted blank line before the conditional block in the help text generation step aids readability. Can you confirm that this formatting improvement does not affect the command’s logic? wdyt?.github/workflows/semantic_pr_check.yml (1)
41-52: Enhancement for PR Title Validation
The new step that checks for "do not merge" in the pull request title looks like a solid enhancement. Converting the title to lowercase and checking for both "do not merge" and "do-not-merge" ensures that case differences won’t let unwanted merges slip through. Would you consider if there are any additional forbidden patterns or edge cases to check? wdyt?🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
45-45: the runner of "actions/github-script@v6" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
docs/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
21-23: Improved Contributor Guidance for Poe Tasks
The new line introducing the use of "Poe" tasks (e.g.,poetry run poe lintandpoetry run poe format-fix) adds clarity and aligns well with our updated task commands in the configuration. Do you think it might be beneficial to briefly explain why using the Poetry environment is critical here, especially for newcomers? wdyt?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.github/workflows/connector-tests.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/docker-build-check.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/pypi_publish.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/python_dependency_analysis.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/semantic_pr_check.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/slash_command_dispatch.yml(1 hunks)debug_manifest/README.md(2 hunks)docs/CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pypi_publish.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
debug_manifest/README.md
[typographical] ~52-~52: Consider adding a comma after ‘Alternatively’ for more clarity.
Context: ...), to wire the CDK env to the debugger. Alternatively you can switch the default interpreter ...
(RB_LY_COMMA)
[style] ~60-~60: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...red catalogfor the target source). 3. Put themanifest.yamlinside the/airbyt...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
debug_manifest/README.md (1)
15-47: Verify JSON Configuration Format and Consistency
The JSON configuration block now uses a 4-space indentation and removes the extraneous comma, which improves both readability and syntactical correctness. Can you confirm that the updated format works seamlessly with VSCode’s debugger?.github/workflows/docker-build-check.yml (1)
10-10: Job Name Formatting Cleanup
The job name now reads “SDM Docker Image Build” without trailing spaces, which aligns nicely with our naming conventions. Does this updated naming meet your expectations?.github/workflows/python_dependency_analysis.yml (2)
22-32: Improve Readability of Workflow Step Indentation
The reindented block for checkout, Python setup, and Poetry setup steps enhances legibility considerably. Can you verify that these formatting changes have no unintended impact on the workflow execution?
33-39: Confirm Shell Command Consistency
The step to install dependencies and run Deptry is now more consistent in its layout. Would you mind confirming that these changes haven’t altered the intended behavior of the job? wdyt?.github/workflows/connector-tests.yml (1)
99-100: Minor Formatting Correction on Permissions Block
Removing the extra space before the inline comment on the “contents: write” line tidies up the file. Does this adjustment reflect your intended style for maintaining consistency?.github/workflows/slash_command_dispatch.yml (1)
1-2: Double-checkpoeCommand Wrapping
The PR objectives mention addressing a bug where certainpoecommands were not correctly wrapped withpoetry run. I don’t see an explicit change here regarding this issue. Could you confirm that all such commands are now wrapped as intended, or is that fix applied elsewhere? wdyt?pyproject.toml (3)
134-134: Formatting Check Task Update
Updating_format-check-ruffto usepoetry run ruff format --check .is a great move to ensure that the command runs in a controlled Poetry environment. Do you want to double-check that this change is fully compatible with our CI and local setups? wdyt?
139-139: Formatting Fix Task Update
Changing_format-fix-rufftopoetry run ruff format .helps in maintaining consistency across our task executions. Are you comfortable that this wrapping won’t introduce any unexpected behavior in different environments? wdyt?
165-165: Unit Test Command Update
Switching theunit-test-with-covcommand to run withpoetry run pytest ...ensures that we’re executing tests within the appropriate dependency context. Have you verified that this change integrates smoothly with our test infrastructure without any performance impacts? wdyt?
Apply consistent formatting to YAML and Markdown files for improved readability and maintainability.
Also fixes a bug where a few poe commands did not wrap with 'poetry run', which could cause the wrong ruff version to be used.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Style
Chores
Documentation