moving ngrams doc page under tokenizers to reflect move in version 0.15.0 #138
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
boblannon
changed the title
Owner
|
Thanks @boblannon. I haven't found time yet to update the docs to reflect the latest changes of the library. I noticed however that you forgot to update the import statements in the code examples :). Can you update them too so I can merge your PR please? |
Contributor
Author
|
updated! |
Owner
|
Thanks @boblannon. Merging right now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just noticed that the docs don't reflect the change in 63b0dd0