Skip to content

[Bug] Review paper workflow #67

@4ndrelim

Description

@4ndrelim

Current review_paper is error-prone and expensive. This is due to diverse project structures and inconsistent sections naming. A more robust way in analyzing project files is in dev.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Design / Spec

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions