Vibe-Trading already has the right instincts here — the per-broker mandate gate (symbol universe, size cap, leverage, daily cap + kill switch) is exactly the right shape. What's missing is the layer above the mandate: a capital-scale-aware verdict on whether this specific order, right now is sound given the current account state.
The mandate says "allowed." /review says "is this wise."
The gap: Your current pre-trade gate is hardcoded per-broker (Robinhood, OKX, Binance…) and fires on structural mandate violations. It doesn't have access to cross-broker equity, drawdown, or open-position context at decision time. An agent running an investment committee swarm can produce a technically mandate-compliant order that's still account-threatening — wrong size relative to current equity, adding leverage into an already extended position, correlated with an open position it doesn't know about.
What /review adds:
- One MCP call, broker-agnostic, works across all your connectors
- Returns
approve / approve_with_concerns / reject + summary + issues
- Account-aware:
account_equity, open_positions, current_drawdown → capital-scale verdict
- Advisory, never blocks: if the endpoint is unreachable or returns an error, the trade proceeds
- Verdict is signed and recomputable — same audit-trail discipline as your per-run token usage logging
- Pay-per-call via x402 (USDC on Base) or Lightning — same infra as your other MCP tool costs
Live dogfood: I run a live Hyperliquid bot that passes every entry through /review before placement. The same gate is now a community example in AlgoVaultLabs/crypto-quant-signal-mcp#28 — AlgoVaultLabs (ERC-8004 verified, same x402 rail) requested the same pattern: their signal → /review → execute or hold.
Suggested integration point: the pre_trade_gate hook that already exists in your broker connectors — wrap it so the mandate check fires first (fast, local), then /review fires for any mandate-passing order (one MCP call, ~150ms). If /review returns reject, log it and hold. That keeps the gate layered and the broker-specific logic unchanged.
MCP endpoint: https://api.babyblueviper.com/mcp — tools/call → review. Full docs at https://api.babyblueviper.com/docs.
Worth exploring, or a "not for us because X"? Happy to wire a reference implementation against any of your broker connectors.
— Federico Blanco, invinoveritas
Vibe-Trading already has the right instincts here — the per-broker mandate gate (symbol universe, size cap, leverage, daily cap + kill switch) is exactly the right shape. What's missing is the layer above the mandate: a capital-scale-aware verdict on whether this specific order, right now is sound given the current account state.
The mandate says "allowed."
/reviewsays "is this wise."The gap: Your current pre-trade gate is hardcoded per-broker (Robinhood, OKX, Binance…) and fires on structural mandate violations. It doesn't have access to cross-broker equity, drawdown, or open-position context at decision time. An agent running an investment committee swarm can produce a technically mandate-compliant order that's still account-threatening — wrong size relative to current equity, adding leverage into an already extended position, correlated with an open position it doesn't know about.
What
/reviewadds:approve/approve_with_concerns/reject+ summary + issuesaccount_equity,open_positions,current_drawdown→ capital-scale verdictLive dogfood: I run a live Hyperliquid bot that passes every entry through
/reviewbefore placement. The same gate is now a community example in AlgoVaultLabs/crypto-quant-signal-mcp#28 — AlgoVaultLabs (ERC-8004 verified, same x402 rail) requested the same pattern: their signal →/review→ execute or hold.Suggested integration point: the
pre_trade_gatehook that already exists in your broker connectors — wrap it so the mandate check fires first (fast, local), then/reviewfires for any mandate-passing order (one MCP call, ~150ms). If/reviewreturnsreject, log it and hold. That keeps the gate layered and the broker-specific logic unchanged.MCP endpoint:
https://api.babyblueviper.com/mcp—tools/call→review. Full docs at https://api.babyblueviper.com/docs.Worth exploring, or a "not for us because X"? Happy to wire a reference implementation against any of your broker connectors.
— Federico Blanco, invinoveritas