WIP (NOT READY FOR REVIEW) Update Results for DataFusion 51.0.0 #703
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
alamb
force-pushed
the
alamb/update_datafusion
branch
from
0c9ff10 to
f9c2654
Compare
… into alamb/update_datafusion
… into alamb/update_datafusion
…ickBench into alamb/update_datafusion
Member
|
@alamb Please ping me when this PR is ready for review - thanks. |
Author
|
Thank you @rschu1ze -- I am still doing some performance analysis (you can see details here if you care apache/datafusion#18909). I will let you know when it is ready |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update DataFusion results for the DataFusion 51 release (TODO add blog URL here when published)
I followed the directions in
Changes
datafusion-clifrom scratch each time, so there are no caches maintained from query to query) - Tag runs as lukewarm #692 (comment)Variants:
Note I did not include datafusion with vortex
(TBD ping SpiralDB)
Results included
Not sure