Add MseeP.ai badge

[lwsinclair]

Hi there,

This pull request shares a security update on mcpx.

We also have an entry for mcpx in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.

We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of mcpx.

You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/aigc-hackers-mcpx.

Yours Sincerely,

Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust

---

Here are our latest evaluation results of mcpx

Security Scan Results

Security Score: 100/100

Risk Level: low

Scan Date: 2025-11-11

Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices

This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added security assessment badge to README for enhanced transparency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A security assessment badge was added to the top of README.md with formatting adjustments. No functional, logical, or content changes were made beyond presentation updates.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
README Documentation Update README.md	Added security assessment badge at the top of the file with an accompanying blank line for formatting

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

This is a straightforward documentation change with minimal impact requiring only a quick verification that the badge displays correctly and formatting is preserved.

Poem

🐰 A badge of trust now shines so bright,
Adorning the README with security light,
A simple line, a guardian's crest,
Assuring all that safety's blessed!
✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding a badge from MseeP.ai to the README, which directly corresponds to the primary modification in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a16fec2 and f219655.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

1-2: Verify maintainer approval for this third-party badge submission.

MseeP.ai appears to be a legitimate early-stage startup providing security assessment services for MCP servers run by SkyDeck AI, but this PR has a critical gap: it was submitted by the MseeP.ai founder rather than by project maintainers, and there's no evidence of explicit project leadership approval.

Key concerns:

1. No maintainer endorsement: The PR frames this as an "invitation" from the service provider, not an approved maintenance decision. Confirm the project leadership has reviewed and explicitly authorized this addition.
2. Early-stage service: The service is young with low traffic and WHOIS privacy enabled. While not a red flag, this warrants caution—validate their assessment methodology before promoting their badge.
3. External URL dependency: The badge image is hosted on a third-party domain (https://mseep.net/pr/aigc-hackers-mcpx-badge.png). If that service becomes unavailable, the badge breaks.
4. Placement: Positioning the badge above the project title may signal over-reliance on external validation. Industry standard is to place security badges after the main description.

Before merging, obtain explicit maintainer approval (ideally documented in an issue or discussion), and ensure the project leadership agrees this represents the project's stance on security validation.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}