User talk:Pythoncoder

This user is a regular, and is indifferent to being templated. You may choose to template or not template him at your own discretion.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pythoncoder.

Hi @Pythoncoder! I recently contested a request for speedy deletion on my draft page for National Students for Justice in Palestine. I understand pages and edits made around the Arab–Israeli conflict require you to be an extended confirmed editor, this makes sense! However, even if I am not able to contribute myself, I would like to propose that an extended confirmed editor take this page up. Thank you! Smartgopher (talk) 22:17, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Pythoncoder!

After reviewing your feedback, I confirmed that there were errors in the sources I asked AI to write in wiki markup. I can say with certainty that I provided AI with the sources I had checked and used them only for citation formatting assistance.

In any case, I regret that I was not careful enough and have corrected all of the errors.

I have also improved my draft to reflect your previous comments about neutrality, avoiding promotional language, and verifying sources.

I would appreciate it if you could review the updated draft when you have time, and let me know if there are any further concerns or areas for improvement.

Thank you. SYParkOfBioneer (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pythoncoder, I appreciate your suggestions and made a couple edits that I think will be beneficial. I’m trying to learn Wiki so that I can contribute to other pages for technical analysts. I am using AI to help learn all of the Wiki rules but I will be mindful of your comments and do better. Wave618 (talk) 20:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don’t recommend using AI on Wikipedia as it is prone to hallucinations. I’ve posted some links on your talk page that may help you on your editing journey. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The draft you previously rejected had not been created yet; I had only added an infobox. I have now completed it. Please review it. Thank you.

Draft:Remona Evette Pereira Novaclia (talk) 12:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User was globally locked for socking —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:26, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	Text generated by a large language model (LLM) or similar tool has been collapsed per relevant Wikipedia guidelines. LLM-generated arguments should be excluded from assessments of consensus.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Mixalakix (talk · contribs) Draft:QBF Fraud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Dear @Pythoncoder, Thank you for reviewing my submission of the QBF Fraud article. I appreciate your detailed feedback regarding concerns about potential AI-generated content. I have substantially revised the article to address each of your specific points: 1. Addressing promotional tone: The revised article maintains strict Wikipedia neutrality throughout. For example, rather than using subjective language, it presents facts objectively: "CySEC imposed administrative fines totaling €25,900" alongside the documented "€70-100 million in investor losses," allowing readers to draw their own conclusions. 2. Eliminating vague statements: Every claim is now supported by specific, verifiable details including: → Exact case numbers (Criminal case No. 12001450007000902, Cyprus District Court Case 525/2022) → Precise financial figures (₽974 million transferred by the Borzenkov family) → Specific dates for all legal proceedings and regulatory actions → Named individuals with their exact roles and sentences 3. Encyclopedic structure: The article now follows standard Wikipedia format with: A properly formatted criminal case infobox Clear section headers following established Wikipedia conventions Factual presentation without editorial commentary Appropriate categorization and cross-references 4. Verifiable sources: All references are to real, accessible sources: - Primary court documents uploaded to Wikimedia Commons - Official CySEC regulatory decisions with direct URLs Major Russian media outlets (Forbes Russia, Kommersant) with specific article dates - Cyprus court judgments from the official cylaw.org database 5. Original synthesis: Rather than paraphrasing single sources, the article synthesizes information from multiple authoritative sources, creating original summary tables and integrating facts from Russian prosecutorial documents, Cyprus court proceedings, and regulatory filings. The revised article draws primarily from court documents, regulatory decisions, and established media sources, presenting a factual account of one of Russia's largest cross-border financial fraud cases. I believe these revisions fully address your concerns and meet Wikipedia's standards for well-sourced, neutral content. I would welcome any additional feedback and am prepared to make further revisions if needed. Thank you for your time and consideration. Mixalakix (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at User talk:Mixalakix, you may be blocked from editing. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Mixalakix (talk) 18:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on upgrading from copy-pasting from LLMs to copy-pasting from the talk page header. I’m still not sure whether you have read or comprehended my previous messages regarding your use of LLMs being inappropriate, but here’s another bulleted list of links that I believe are relevant here:

• Demonstrate good faith
• AGF is not a suicide pact
• LLM/chatbot comments in discussions

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• YAKSH75 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tumm Se Tumm Tak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need To make an article so please give me rights o make article if there is any problem about my account tel me know

YAKSH75 (talk) 08:26, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have a specific question regarding my draft review? —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pythoncoder, Can you please tell me why you are setting up my page for deletion. Could you also tell me how to stop it from getting deleted. I made this page for a family member and I would like to keep it. Thanks, Logan LoganPollard331 (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not nominate your page for deletion. If you wish to voice your opinion that the page should be kept, you can go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George D. Ellsworth, but make sure your arguments are backed up by Wikipedia’s guidelines — see WP:AADD for advice on this. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:04, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for thinking you nominated my page for deletion. Thanks for the info, I'll definitely take a look.

Have a good evenin. LoganPollard331 (talk) 00:53, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already converted the U14 World Cup Part 13 page into English. Rafael2345 (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(user was indef blocked for sockpuppetry) —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:17, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pythoncoder , thank you for reviewing my draft on Avra Banerjee. I noticed that the submission was declined with the reason that it contains promotional or advertising content. Could you kindly help me understand specifically which parts of the article or which sources were considered promotional? I’d like to revise it to meet Wikipedia’s neutrality and sourcing standards, but I want to make sure I correct the appropriate sections. Swtysinha (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with everything that was said at the AfC help desk. In particular, I would like to once again strongly discourage you from using AI chatbots when editing Wikipedia. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:23, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]