From Wikibooks, open books for an open world
Support - well structured and well written. It also sticks to the topic at hand, namely the C# language, not the whole .NET architecture. However, while inter-chapter navigation is good, there is no navigation within chapters. Also, not complete yet. I still feel that this is a good book. Webaware talk 01:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I like this book, but I dont really like the complicated way that they used templates syntax-highlighting. however, it is an innovative solution to a common problem (although now we have automatic syntax highlighting built right into the mediawiki software). Some of the later chapters are a little light on content as well, but I find that to be the case in nearly every book. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 01:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I greatly enjoy the language and think this book provides some decent material on it. -withinfocus 21:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Should the red keywords be written? Zginder 20:24, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - It looks like a good book but why don't any of these books provide links to somewhere on the web where you can see a working example of what has just been taught in the book (like a little program highlighting usage of loops, etc.)? Xania
talk 19:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 4 support, no opposition after a long nomination. I'll add the necessary links. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 23:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
