Talk:cpp/utility/functional/less
From cppreference.com
< Talk:cpp | utility | functional
With regards to the note about std::less<void> behaving in a similar manner to std::less<T*> in that it "yields a strict total order": Isn't this "since C++17"? It's marked as "since C++14". N4140, the C++14 final draft doesn't appear to have wording to this effect. N4659, the C++17 final draft, does have this wording at the [comparisons] section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quincunx271 (talk • contribs)
- We treat LWG issue 2562 as a defect report and apply it retroactively. T. Canens (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2018 (PDT)
