Honor 400 battery life and charging speed results are in Comments
- rororo
- RNx
I wonder if the test was done with the Smart Battery Capacity features disabled or enabled! And how much does that particular function really effects the battery capacity?
Is it true that it limits the battery capacity to only 80%?
And every single Chinese phone brands will be exposed if we do independent tests like this
4500 nits... 3840 pwm dimming... 60 months of lag-free performance... 1,000,000 folds... 50 years of heavy usage...
the first rule of thumb is always to take it as a lie unless proven otherwise
- Esmejo
- 8Ws
Anonymous, 09 Jun 2025"Not bad samsung" ... Compared to a phone thats 3x less in price....So? That's why is expensive. It's optimized while idiots on the internet only look at the numbers and claim "it's 3x less, is ok if is crap".
- Anonymous
- DxW
SweeetY, 09 Jun 2025And these results are from a big Si/C 5300 mAh battery...The much criticized S25 Edge gives ab... more"Not bad samsung"
... Compared to a phone thats 3x less in price....
- SweeetY
- nLm
And these results are from a big Si/C 5300 mAh battery...The much criticized S25 Edge gives about the same result with a 3900mAh regular tech battery and bigger screen....so no bad for Samsung !
- Terror0
- JhV
usually Samsung a56 gets bullied by it's competition, but i think that honor can take the "clown" role for now... (I'd choose honor 200 over this and many people would do the same as well if they knew about the specs, value for money is very important).
- Anonymous
- Mkx
And this is suing Si/C battery. LOL.
This should be a $200 phone.
- Atabaev
- 6p@
Editor, Did you mean 7:08 h of active user score??
"The results from the battery tests are far from ideal. The handset drags behind the competition with a 12:29h Active Use Score. That's considerably below what most phones score in the same price bracket."
- Un-disputed
- Nu7
MontyTech, 08 Jun 2025Extremely unfair comparison. You guys are comparing it with budget flagship devices while the ... moreAnd it's not nice when they do stuff like that.
- Anonymous
- fFC
MontyTech, 08 Jun 2025Extremely unfair comparison. You guys are comparing it with budget flagship devices while the ... moreThey said same price segment, the poco f7 is even a lot cheaper than honor 400
- IlyaSh
- Sdg
Guys, please, in charging lab tests: test with default PowerDelivery charger also - times, wattage.
In Europe chargers are sold separately and usually people have standard PD-charger at home already. And for traveling it is even more important.
- MontyTech
- 04R
Extremely unfair comparison. You guys are comparing it with budget flagship devices while the device itself is midrange.13R shouldn't be even on the list since it has 8 gen 3, 14T pro as well with flagship MTK chipset.
The test should be done with phones in same price range, such as:. Samsung A56, Xiaomi Redmi note 14 Pro + 5g, Motorola edge 60 or 50, iphone 16e and Nothing 3a pro.
Even the Poco phone is a flagship, should be compared to normal F7.
For Honor 200 you guys completely skipped Battery test since you knew it will beat all other phones, skipped Honor 300 as a meme device and went for this one.
- Anonymous
- KiY
Wonder how long is 400 series sot/aus lasts with 6kmah battery. Won't they trying to review global unit instead?
- rizki1
- Ki1
all Chinese mid range with this beast SoC, high resolution have good battery even Motorola has also improved and Samsung is the worst with weaker SoC.
