Training Resource Allocation

Maximizing ROI on invested time for health Geoff Yang (GY): Dustin Nabhan, people investing time in their health goals but not always in the right places. When you work with elite athletes, how do you maximize their ROI? Dustin Nabhan (DN): It starts with quantified goals & rigorous measurement. In professional sports, we don't guess. We assess relevant systems and performance inputs: strength, power, nutrition, recovery, body composition, etc. Then we allocate time and resources to the areas with the biggest gaps. The same logic applies to anyone serious about performing at the highest level. GY: Most people aren't getting that kind of assessment? DN: Right, and that's the issue. You need to set goals, assess where you are, build a plan, and measure your progress. Without that, you're guessing. You might spend 5 hours a week on cardio, but if your aerobic fitness is already in the 85th percentile for your age/gender while your muscle fitness is in the 40th, you're overinvesting in a strength and underinvesting in a weakness. That imbalance may show up as injury, lower energy, lower performance, or accelerated aging in the systems they've been neglecting. GY: That's essentially the idea behind our Healthspan Domains™ model. DN: Instead of treating "health" as one thing, we break it into eight measurable domains: aerobic fitness, muscle fitness, body composition, bone, balance, movement quality, cognitive health, and blood biomarkers. Each domain is scored on a percentile basis for your age and gender. So we’re not comparing a 25-year-old female triathlete to a 55-year old male C-Suite executive. GY: Why does that matter? DN: We’ve seen conceptual curves showing healthspan vs longevity. But the question is: where are you on that curve? How do you go from a subjective assessment, like "I'm in pretty good shape," to something predictive of how you’ll perform and how you’ll age?  When you see you’re in the 83rd percentile for bone density but the 41st for body composition, the conversation shifts immediately. You focus on "how do I move this specific number?" That's a much more productive mindset. GY: So how does this change a time-strapped executive's approach? DN: It becomes a resource allocation problem, which is something executives understand. If you only have 3 hours, invest it where you get the highest ROI for your goals and health. That might be changes in training, nutrition, or sleep.  The domain scores act as a filter. They tell you: here are the 1 or 2 areas where investment will generate the highest return. The Apeiron Life team then builds protocols around those gaps — specific, measurable, time-efficient. Then add optimal frequency and sequencing and multiply it all using technology, supplements, biohacks. GY: Focus moves outcomes. DN: Exactly. In professional sports, we set the goal, measure what matters, focus effort where it counts, and let the data do the prioritizing.  That's how you get the most out of limited time.

A lot of time and money goes into corporate training—but not nearly enough comes out of it. In fact, companies spent $130 billion on training last year, yet only 25% of programs measurably improved business performance. Having run countless training workshops, I’ve seen firsthand what makes the difference. Some teams walk away energized and equipped. Others… not so much. If you’re involved in organizing training—whether for a small team or a large department—here’s how to make sure it actually works: ✅ Do your research. Talk to your team. What skills would genuinely help them day-to-day? A few interviews or a quick survey can reveal exactly where to focus. ✅ Start with a solid brief. Give your trainer as much context as possible: goals, audience, skill levels, examples of past work, what’s worked—and what hasn’t. ✅ Don’t shortchange the time. A 90-minute session might inspire, but it won’t transform. For deeper learning and hands-on practice, give it time—ideally 2+ hours or spaced chunks over a few days. ✅ Share real examples. Generic content doesn’t stick. When the trainer sees your actual slides, templates, and challenges, they can tailor the session to hit home. ✅ Choose the right group size. Smaller groups mean better interaction and more personalized support. If you want engagement, resist the temptation to pack the (virtual) room. ✅ Make it matter. Set expectations. Send reminders. And if it’s virtual, cameras on goes a long way toward focus and connection. ✅ Schedule follow-up support. Reinforcement matters. Book a post-session Q&A, office hours, or refresher so people actually use what they’ve learned. ✅ Follow up. Send a quick survey afterward to measure impact and shape the next session. One-off training rarely moves the needle—but a well-planned series can. Helping teams level up their presentation skills is what I do—structure, storytelling, design, and beyond. If that’s on your radar, I’d love to help. DM me to get the conversation started.

Most training programs create excitement. Very few create measurable business impact. A few months ago, I worked with an organization that had a very specific challenge. Their frontline teams were attending workshops, feeling motivated, taking notes but when it came to actual performance on the field, their sales conversion was very low. Great energy. Poor execution. Something was missing. So before designing the learning intervention, I asked one simple question: “What’s the real context in which your people operate daily?” Not the role. Not the job description. Not the competencies. The context. What pressures do they face? What conversations are toughest? Where do deals collapse? Who influences decisions? What behaviours matter most on the ground? The organization opened up. We mapped real scenarios. We shadowed calls. We watched interactions. We decoded customer psychology. We understood the reality behind the numbers. Only then did we build the training journey. Not generic content. Not textbook concepts. Not motivational theory. But a program designed exactly around their on-ground realities. The impact. Over the next eight weeks, something changed. Sales conversations became sharper. Objections were handled with more confidence. Teams spoke value, not price. Managers reinforced learning consistently. The conversion saw a huge jump and this was created not by more training, but by the right training. The lesson is simple: Content informs. Context transforms. Workshops don’t create results. Relevance does. When learning mirrors the real world, people don’t just listen they apply. When they apply, organizations grow. What’s one area in your team where you feel content is high but context is missing? If your organization wants training that delivers real, measurable outcomes let’s talk.

A Training Needs Analysis (TNA) framework provides a systematic approach to identifying and addressing skill gaps, ensuring your training initiatives are effective and aligned with organizational goals. The TNA framework starts with clearly defining objectives and scope, ensuring that your analysis is targeted and relevant. Data collection involves using a mix of methods, such as surveys, interviews, and observation to gather comprehensive insights into current performance levels. Once data is analyzed, specific training needs are identified and prioritized based on urgency, impact, and feasibility. The next step is to develop tailored training solutions, followed by an action plan that outlines the timeline, resources, and responsibilities. Effective implementation and evaluation ensure that the training leads to measurable improvements in performance. Continuous monitoring and adaptation keep the training program relevant over time. A well-executed TNA framework is essential for driving organisational growth and employee development.  It is not just about filling skill gaps, it’s about building a smarter, more agile organisation that’s ready to meet future challenges. Invest the time in a thorough TNA, and your training efforts will yield real, measurable results. By systematically identifying and addressing training needs, you can enhance performance, boost engagement, and ensure your team is equipped to meet future challenges. #training #workforcedevelopment #L&D #learninganddevelopment #trainingneedsanalysis #employeeengagement #HRstrategy  

Most training fails quietly... but not because people did not learn. Because the organisation never created the conditions for learning to survive operational reality. A recent study (Mehner et al., 2025) explored what actually determines whether workplace training turns into meaningful performance improvement. The answer was not course quality alone. It was the social system around the learner. The researchers found that... Supervisor support increased training transfer Peer support increased knowledge sharing Motivation alone was insufficient Volition, persisting through resistance and operational friction, mattered heavily Informal knowledge networks became critical after training One finding stood out to me... Employees who successfully transferred learning often expanded their internal knowledge networks afterwards. In other words: Capability development did not stop when the course ended...It accelerated through workplace relationships. That matters because many organisations still evaluate training as an isolated event: attendance completion satisfaction scores assessment pass rates But performance reliability is shaped afterwards: Can people apply the learning under pressure? Do managers reinforce it? Do peers support it? Is there psychological safety to experiment? Is knowledge shared across the system? Does the environment sustain behavioural execution? This is why two people can attend the same programme and produce completely different outcomes. The training may be identical...The surrounding conditions are not. Capability exists in the individual...Performance emerges from the system around them. Reference: Mehner, L., Rothenbusch, S., & Kauffeld, S. (2025). How to maximize the impact of workplace training: a mixed-method analysis of social support, training transfer and knowledge sharing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

A lot of trainers run a great exercise… and then waste the learning moment that follows. The debrief is where performance improvement actually happens. But too often we get generic reflections: “Yeah, that was good” or “Interesting exercise.” None of that helps anyone perform better back on the job. A simple tool I use in almost every session, face-to-face or virtual, is the Feedback Grid. It structures the debrief so delegates can evaluate the outcomes of an exercise, not just how it felt. Here’s exactly how to use it straight after an activity: 1. Set up the 4 quadrants before the exercise Worked Well (+) Needs Change (Δ) Questions (?) New Ideas (💡) By having it visible from the start, delegates know there will be a structured review, not a free-for-all discussion. 2. Immediately after the exercise, ask individuals to add notes Give everyone 2–3 minutes to jot down their thoughts in each category. This stops dominant voices from setting the tone and gives you a broader view of what actually happened. In a virtual room, this is as simple as shared online sticky notes. Face-to-face, use flipcharts or a whiteboard. 3. Analyse the activity, not the activity’s “vibe” This is where most trainers go wrong. We’re not asking whether they “liked” the exercise. We’re capturing what the exercise showed about their skills, behaviours, and decision-making. Examples might include: Worked Well: “Clearer roles helped us move faster.” Needs Change: “We didn’t communicate early enough.” Questions: “How do we apply this under time pressure?” New Ideas: “Create a decision checklist before starting.” These are performance insights, not opinions. 4. Turn the grid into next-step actions Once patterns emerge, summarise 2–3 practical actions they can take into the workplace. This is where the ROI sits. The exercise becomes a rehearsal, and the grid becomes the bridge to real work. 5. Keep the pace tight A structured debrief shouldn’t drag. Five to eight minutes is enough to turn a simple exercise into a meaningful learning moment. When used properly, the Feedback Grid transforms exercises from “fun activities” into performance diagnostics. That’s the whole point of training, to improve what people do, not what they think about the training. What do you use for this? -------------------- Follow me at Sean McPheat for more L&D content and then hit the 🔔 button to stay updated on my future posts. ♻️ Save for later and repost to help others. 📄 Download a high-res PDF of this & 250 other infographics at: https://lnkd.in/eWPjAjV7

The best training programs break three sacred HR rules. While most HR teams focus on completion rates and satisfaction scores, high-ROI learning experiences deliberately ignore these metrics. They measure behavior change at 30, 60, and 90 days instead of smile sheets at day one. Here's what's actually happening: Companies are throwing billions at learning programs that never stick. The "Great Training Robbery" study proves what many suspected all along. But here's the real problem. We're designing backwards. → Measuring engagement instead of application → Tracking completion rather than competency → Celebrating attendance over actual outcomes The organisations getting results? They flip this completely. Start with the business goal. Work backwards to the behavior change needed. Then design the learning experience. Simple. Instead of "Did people enjoy the session?" they ask "Can our people perform differently now?" This shift shows up in real numbers. Companies measuring behavioural change report 25% higher performance improvements compared to traditional training metrics. For HR teams, this means stepping away from being the completion rate police. Start being the performance change architect instead. Your learning budget is too valuable for vanity metrics. What are you actually measuring in your training programs?

Many teams obsess over ROI for training programmes. I believe that’s the wrong place to start. ROI is calculated after the fact — often in isolation, with little cooperation from managers or participants. It tends to be defensive and reactive. Plus, hard to attribute accurately. But if you want training that actually drives behaviour change and pipeline impact, you need to start before the programme even runs. That’s where ROE – Return on Expectations – comes in. --- ROE is a concept I've come across in the New World Kirkpatrick Model, and it’s one of the most powerful ideas I’ve used in programme design. Instead of just measuring results in isolation, you build a contract with stakeholders upfront that: ✅ Defines the behaviours you expect to see ✅ Links them to pipeline outcomes ✅ Creates shared ownership across enablement, managers, and reps --- For a discovery training programme, your ROE contract (for a period of 12 weeks) might include: • Raising discovery→opportunity conversion from 38% to 48% within 12 weeks.    • Increasing the share of opps with quantified pain & success criteria captured by Day 10 of the opps lifecycle from 22% to 60%. • Lifting early multi-threading (≥2 stakeholders engaged by 2nd call) from 34% to 55% • Ensuring CI scorecard ratings on discovery trend upward to ≥3.8/5 by Week 12 • Requiring managers to run weekly group discovery clinics, with Sales Ops reporting bi-weekly on progress This is all about creating mutual accountability and aligning everyone on what “good” looks like before you deliver training and surrounding activities. --- How do you define success for your training programmes? Curious to hear your thoughts 👇 #sales #salesenablement #salestraining  

Insights from 300,000,000,000+ lbs lifted on Tonal. Three lessons from the data that apply to any fitness business and any trainee. 1) Coaches. Classes. Community. Necessary. Not sufficient. Great coaching drives intent. Great classes create energy. Great community builds belonging. None of them record progress. When every rep, load, and volume target is tracked, members can see measurable improvement. Strength up. PRs climbing. Streak increasing. Members who regularly review their training data complete more sessions. If you do not measure progress, you cannot show it. 2) Minimum dose. Maximum engagement. Time is still the number one barrier. If we want consistency, we have to remove it. The first hard sets of a movement produce by far the largest share of the strength and hypertrophy stimulus. Experiment with 15–30 minute sessions instead of 45–60. Prioritize compound movements over isolation work. Use supersets. Use drop sets or myo-reps. You can often compress meaningful stimulus into ~50% less time. Large population studies show meaningful health benefits from relatively small weekly doses of strength training, often around 30–60 minutes per week. Shorter sessions increase completion rates. Build around adherence. 3) Balance consistency with strategic variation. On paper, 16 weeks of the same exercises with double progression looks ideal. If members stop at week three, it’s a failure. Tonal data show completion rates decline as program length increases. Four to twelve weeks is the range where engagement and results align. Sequence programs for progressive overload. Adjust the emphasis. Alternate bilateral and unilateral work. Add eccentric loading. Shift rep ranges. Modify the rest intervals. Programs should evolve without resetting progress. If you had access to the world’s largest strength training dataset, what would you want to learn from it?

𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐈𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭 — 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐚 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 A 2025 systematic review by Mercy Obeng-Tuaah analyzed over a decade of research on training and development — and the results are impossible to ignore. Organizations that treat training as a strategic investment don’t just build skills — they build performance, innovation, and loyalty. Key Findings from the Study: ✅ Productivity & Efficiency Gains  • Structured training programs increased productivity by 15–30% across industries.  • Leadership training improved efficiency by 30%, while job-specific training reduced operational errors by 22%. ✅ Best Training Methods  • Blended learning (mixing digital + hands-on training) topped the list with 88% effectiveness.  • On-the-job training (85%), technical bootcamps (86%), and leadership development (81%) outperformed traditional e-learning (75%).  • Microlearning (84%) and simulation-based training (82%) enhanced engagement and retention — especially for complex or high-risk work. ✅ Job Satisfaction & Retention  • Employee retention increased by 40% in companies that invested in development programs.  • Career progression training reduced turnover by 30%, while mentorship programs cut it by 29%.  • Recognition-linked training increased motivation by 37% and leadership programs raised loyalty by 28%. ✅ Barriers to Implementation  • 40% of firms cited training costs as their biggest challenge.  • 35% struggled with time constraints, 30% lacked evaluation metrics, and 25% faced employee resistance.  • Outdated content and limited leadership support further reduced training effectiveness. 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐎𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐞 Because these numbers represent more than learning outcomes — they reflect performance outcomes. Training isn’t a one-time event; it’s a system that shapes capability, engagement, and innovation. When organizations connect training to data — productivity, safety, quality, retention — they don’t just educate employees… they elevate them. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐈/𝐎 𝐏𝐬𝐲𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 𝐀𝐝𝐝𝐬 𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞 Industrial-Organizational Psychology helps organizations engineer learning that sticks: 🔹 Job & Task Analysis – Identify which skills truly drive performance. 🔹 Evidence-Based Design – Build learning that matches how adults learn and retain. 🔹 Measurement & ROI – Quantify how learning impacts key metrics. 🔹 Culture & Change – Overcome resistance and foster a learning mindset. Organizations don’t fail because people stop caring — they fail when people stop learning. When training is designed through the lens of I/O Psychology — aligned, measurable, and human-centered — performance becomes inevitable. #WorkplaceEngineer #IOPsychology #LearningThatSticks #TrainingAndDevelopment #HumanCenteredDesign #ManufacturingExcellence #EmployeeEngagement #WorkforceDevelopment #OrganizationalPerformance