“Train-the-trainers” (TTT) is one of the most common methods used to scale up improvement & change capability across organisations, yet we often fail to set it up for success. A recent article, drawing on teacher professional development & transfer-of-training research, argues TTT should always be based on an “offer-and-use” model: OFFER: what the programme provides—facilitator expertise, session design, practice opportunities, feedback, follow-up support & evaluation. USE: what participants do with those opportunities—what they notice, how they make sense of it, how much they engage, what they learn, & whether they apply it in real work. How to design TTT that works & sticks: 1. Design for real-world use: Clarify the practical outcome - what trainers should do differently in their next sessions & what that should improve for the organisation. Plan beyond the classroom with post-course support so people can apply learning. Space learning over time rather than delivering it in one intensive block, because spacing & follow-ups support sustained use. 2. Use strong facilitators: Select facilitators who know the topic & how adults learn, how groups work & how to give useful feedback. Ensure they teach “how to make this stick at work” (apply & sustain practices), not only “how to deliver a session.” 3. Make practice central: Build the programme around realistic rehearsal: deliver, get feedback, & practise again until skills become automatic. Use participants’ real scenarios (especially change situations) to strengthen transfer. Include safe practice for difficult moments (challenge, unexpected questions) & treat mistakes as learning. Build peer learning so participants learn with & from each other, not just the facilitator. 4. Prepare participants to succeed: Assess what participants already know & can do, then tailor the learning. Build confidence to use skills at work (confidence predicts application). Help each person create a simple, specific plan for when & how they will use the approaches in their next training sessions. 5. Ensure workplace transfer support: Enable quick application (opportunities to deliver training soon after the course), plus time & resources to do it well. Provide ongoing support (feedback, coaching, & encouragement) from leaders, peers &/or the wider organisation. 6. Evaluate what matters: Go beyond satisfaction scores - assess whether trainers changed their practice & whether this improved outcomes for learners & the organisation. Use findings to improve the next iteration as a continuous improvement cycle, not a one-off event. https://lnkd.in/eJ-Xrxwm. By Prof. Dr. Susanne Wisshak & colleagues, sourced via John Whitfield MBA
Teacher Training Program Structure Guide
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
A teacher training program structure guide is a practical framework that outlines how to develop, organize, and deliver professional development for educators, ensuring learning is meaningful, ongoing, and applied in real classroom settings. It combines thoughtful curriculum planning, active practice, collaborative routines, and continual support to help teachers grow their skills and confidently implement new strategies.
- Clarify outcomes: Start by identifying what teachers should be able to do differently after training and make sure the program connects to real-world classroom needs.
- Focus on practice: Build the training around rehearsal and feedback, using authentic teaching scenarios so new skills become second nature.
- Support and evaluate: Offer ongoing guidance and follow-up, and check whether teachers are actually applying what they've learned to improve student learning.
-
-
Most schools get curriculum training wrong. They spend thousands on new materials and hope a one-day PD does the trick. Here’s what usually happens: Teachers get a thick guide no one has time to read. The opening training is surface-level and rushed. By October, folks are improvising. By January, the curriculum barely resembles what was purchased. This isn’t a teacher problem. It’s a training problem. If you want your curriculum to actually drive results, here’s how to do it right: 1. Start with the Why Don’t assume buy-in. Build it. Teachers need to understand: - Why this curriculum? - What gaps will it help close? - What strengths will it build on? - How will it make the work more effective, not more complicated? 2. Prioritize Execution Over Exposure Sitting through a launch PD isn’t enough. Training should be: Ongoing: part of PLCs, coaching, and planning Practice-based: including rehearsal and feedback Modeled: leaders and coaches need to show what good looks like, which means they need to put themselves in the role of teachers and plan a lesson like a teacher would and then model it 3. Build a Strong Prep Routine No great lesson happens without preparation. Create a shared playbook: - Clear planning protocols - Exemplar lessons and student work - Expectations for lesson internalization 4. Make Collaboration the Default Teachers shouldn’t be planning alone. Schedule weekly co-planning. Pair teachers to internalize together. Review lesson execution with video and feedback. Curriculum is just a tool. Whether it works depends entirely on how you train people to use it.
-
Want to think smarter about teacher development? Imagine it like a burger: ↓ Getting better as a teacher (or helping others to get better) is not an easy task. This is due to things like the paradox of expertise (the best teachers make it *look* easy), the knowing-doing gap, and habit inertia. To give ourselves the greatest chance of success, we must invest heavily in 'what works' when it comes to professional development (PD) and ignore almost everything else. So... what works? Instructional coaching? Learning communities? Lesson study? Well, it actually doesn’t make a lot of sense to ask whether things like instructional coaching are effective. It's like asking if a burger is healthy. It depends on what they contain. Like a burger, any PD is only as good as its *ingredients*. And so, what are the 6 essential ingredients of effective PD? If any of the following are absent, change is unlikely to happen: 1/ GET IT → Helping teachers to develop an understanding of the science of teaching and learning. 2/ SEE IT → Helping teachers to develop a bank of strategies of what the science looks like in practice. 3/ TRY IT → Engaging in rehearsal to help teachers contextualise these strategies for their subject(s), students, and selves. 4/ KEEP IT → Helping teachers to build fluency in these strategies and embed them in the routines of their work. 5/ FIT IT → Tailoring development to the contexts and needs of teachers and, where possible, their teams and schools. 6/ OWN IT → Motivating teachers to invest effort in all these processes and follow through with any commitments they make. NOTE GET IT and SEE IT can be done in either order, but both must come before TRY IT, which must come before KEEP IT. FIT IT and OWN IT should be considered before and throughout the PD experience. The 'IT' in each case refers to the content of each activity. And so, while the nature of these ingredients is generic for all teachers, their content should be specific to the subject, age range, or even culture each teacher operates in. All in all, this is how we end up building the domain-specific knowledge necessary for expert teaching. 🎓 For more, check out this systematic review and guidance report on effective professional development. https://lnkd.in/eyikK9mj SUMMARY To get better as a teacher (or help others get better), we need these 6 ‘essential ingredients’ to be present: → Understanding the science → Seeing examples of practice → Rehearsing → Building habits → Tailoring to individual needs → Securing motivation 👊