I have used this method on 100+ projects, Now, I am giving it here for free. Battle-tested playbook I’ve used with 100+ teams from startups to enterprise to reduce the AWS bill by 30% No fluff. No fancy dashboards. Just what actually works. Day 1–2: Cost Explorer + Tagging Audit → Open [AWS Cost Explorer] → Enable hourly + resource-level granularity → Filter by service, then by linked accounts → Identify top 3 spend categories (e.g., EC2, S3, Data Transfer) Now tag everything: - `Project` - `Owner` - `Environment` (dev/stage/prod) - `CostCenter` (if needed) Why? Untagged = invisible = unaccountable. Without tags, you’re flying blind. Pro tip: Use AWS Resource Groups to group untagged items. Day 3–4: Right-size Your Compute → Use AWS Compute Optimizer → Check EC2 instances with <20% CPU and Memory over 7–30 days → Consider: - Downgrading (e.g., m5 → t3) - Switching to **Graviton** (ARM-based, 20–40% cheaper) - Moving to **Fargate or Lambda** if infra is idle often Also review: - RDS instances: auto-pause in dev - ECS services: scale down unused services Why? Compute is often 60–70% of your bill. Fix this first. Day 5: Delete Zombie Infra → Use [Trusted Advisor] + [AWS Config] to find: - Orphaned EBS volumes (attached to terminated EC2s) - Idle Load Balancers (no traffic for 14+ days) - Old RDS snapshots (more than 7–14 days old) - Elastic IPs not attached to running instances - Unused S3 buckets storing logs from years ago Set deletion policies where safe. For dev resources, enforce auto-termination tags. Why? These don’t show up in dashboards But quietly drain your budget. Day 6: Set Storage Lifecycle Policies → For S3 buckets: - Archive logs after 30 days (Glacier or Deep Archive) - Delete test files after 90 days - Enable versioning cleanup → For EBS volumes: - Schedule snapshot pruning - Auto-delete unused volumes post-instance termination Why? Storage rarely gets optimized until it explodes. But small tweaks = big gains over time. Day 7: Set Budgets + Alerts → Go to [AWS Budgets] → Create: - Overall budget (with 80%, 90%, 100% thresholds) - Service-specific budgets (e.g., EC2, S3) - Linked account budgets if using Organizations → Set alerts via email or Slack (SNS integration) → Bonus: Add alerts for sudden cost spikes using anomaly detection Why? No alert = no awareness = no action. What happens after 7 days? You’ve got: ✅ Visibility ✅ Ownership ✅ Quick wins ✅ A repeatable process And most teams save 25–40% in the first month alone. We do this for AWS customers all the time. Want me to run this playbook for your infrastructure? DM me “audit” and I’ll spend 30 mins on your AWS account for free. Let’s make your cloud cost-efficient, not chaotic.
How to Downscale Cloud Services Safely
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Downscaling cloud services safely means reducing the resources or capacity you use in the cloud without risking outages, losing important data, or causing unexpected problems. This process helps businesses trim unnecessary costs while maintaining the reliability and performance users expect from their applications.
- Audit and monitor: Regularly check your cloud usage and costs to spot idle resources, overprovisioned servers, or forgotten storage that can be reduced or removed.
- Automate resource management: Use scheduling tools and auto-scaling features to automatically turn off or scale down services when they're not needed, especially in test and development environments.
- Right-size infrastructure: Adjust server sizes and storage based on actual workload requirements, so you’re not paying for extra capacity your business doesn’t use.
-
-
30% of cloud spending is wasted due to inefficiencies. I keep seeing the same pattern in AVD environments. VMs overprovisioned "just to be safe". Auto-scaling policies that were never actually configured. Storage accounts nobody's looked at in months. Meanwhile, finance is questioning every Azure invoice. Applying DevOps principles to your cloud desktop environment genuinely fixes this: 🔹 Infrastructure as Code - Use Terraform, Bicep or Nerdio Manager to automate resource provisioning. When infrastructure is code, environments become reproducible, auditable, and cost-optimised by default. No more inconsistent deployments that drift and accumulate waste. 🔹 Automated Scaling - Configure Nerdio AVD scaling plans properly. Enable Start VM on Connect so session hosts stay deallocated until users actually need them. You only pay for compute when someone's working. 🔹 Continuous Monitoring - Azure Monitor or Nerdio Manager autoscaling history gives you visibility into usage patterns. Once you have that data, you can identify which host pools are overprovisioned and which storage accounts are burning money overnight. 🔹 Right-Sizing Resources - Match VM SKUs to actual workload requirements. I've seen customers running D16S for users who barely touch 4 vCPUs. That's expensive guesswork. Use metrics to validate your sizing decisions. 🔹 Regular Cost Audits - Schedule quarterly reviews of your cloud resources. Orphaned disks, unattached public IPs, oversized FSLogix storage tiers... these accumulate quietly and compound monthly. 🔹 Automation Tooling - Nerdio Manager for Enterprise automates much of this for AVD. Intelligent autoscaling, cost reporting, right-sizing recommendations. Takes the manual effort out of continuous optimisation. The organisations I work with that treat cloud desktop infrastructure as code rather than clicking through portals consistently see material cost reductions. Most teams know what to do - actually implementing it consistently is where things fall apart. What's the biggest cost-waste generator you've found in your environment? #AVD #DevOps #Azure #Nerdio #FinOps #AzureVirtualDesktop #Azure #Nerdio
-
Ever Used Stacked Utilisation Graphs for Clusters right-sizing? So you are looking at some utilisation data and you are getting spikes in CPU usage around the 60-70%. You think you can't right-size the servers to save money. But, ask yourself, are these servers in a cluster, and are they part of the same group doing the same thing? If so, take a moment and plot all the servers' utilisation together on a stack chart and see what it looks like. You might get something that looks like the stacked graph in the graphic. Now we see that the spikes only affect one server at a time. Hence, you could reduce the number of servers. The peak load in my example on the 4 servers is only 115% of the total 400% combined capacity; you could spread that load across 3 or even 2 servers, and everything would still work. You need to consider if the additional load on the remaining servers (caused by removing servers) does not increase utilisation on the spiking server by more than about 80%. In the example, going to two servers at peak, we would get around 81% on the spiking servers and 35% on the other. Like all things cloud cost related, you can always transition to the final config, so you could reduce to three servers, monitor and if all goes well, reduce to two later. Note, the fewer servers you have, the less resilient your system is to a failure. So, also factor in your SLO when it comes to reliability. Next, you have to make sure you have a low probability of the spike occurring across multiple servers. To overcome this, extract out a long time period as you can with good granularity, e.g. 3 months at 5 minutes. Then you can work on the max cumulative CPU you observed. #PerformanceEngineering #CostOptimization
-
Want to slash your EC2 costs? Here are practical strategies to help you save more on cloud spend. Cost optimization of applications running on EC2 can be achieved through various strategies, depending on the type of applications and their usage patterns. For example, is the workload a customer-facing application with steady or fluctuating demand, or is it for batch processing or data analysis? It also depends on the environment, such as production or non-production, because workloads in non-production environments often don't need EC2 instances to run 24x7. With these considerations in mind, the following approaches can be applied for cost optimization: 1. Autoscaling: In a production environment with a workload that has known steady demand, a combination of EC2 Savings Plans for the baseline demand and Spot Instances for volatile traffic can be used, coupled with autoscaling and a load balancer. This approach leverages up to a 72% discount with Savings Plans for predictable usage, while Spot Instances offer even greater savings, with up to 90% savings for fluctuating traffic. Use Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing to manage resources efficiently and scale down during off-peak hours. 2. Right Sizing: By analyzing the workload—such as one using only 50% memory and CPU on a c5 instance—you can downsize to a smaller, more cost-effective instance type, such as m4 or t3, significantly reducing costs. Additionally, in non-production environments, less powerful and cheaper instances can be used since performance requirements are lower compared to production. Apply rightsizing to ensure you're not over-provisioning resources, incurring unnecessary costs. Use AWS tools like AWS Cost Explorer, Compute Optimizer, or CloudWatch to monitor instance utilization (CPU, memory, network, and storage). This helps you identify whether you’re over-provisioned or under-provisioned. 3. Downscaling: Not all applications need to run 24x7. Workloads like batch processing, which typically run at night, can be scheduled to shut down during the day and restart when necessary, significantly saving costs. Similarly, workloads in test or dev environments don't need to be up and running 24x7; they can be turned off during weekends, further reducing costs. 4. Spot Instances: Fault-tolerant and interruptible workloads, such as batch processing, CI/CD, and data analysis, can be deployed on Spot Instances, offering up to 90% savings over On-Demand instances. Use Spot Instances for lower-priority environments such as DEV and Test, where interruptions are acceptable, to save costs significantly. Cost optimization is not a one-time activity but a continual process that requires constant monitoring and reviewing of workload and EC2 usage. By understanding how resources are being used, you can continually refine and improve cost efficiency. Love to hear your thoughts-what strategies have you used to optimize your EC2 costs?
-
If I were Head of FinOps of a SaaS company, here’s my 4-step playbook to cut up to 20% off our cloud costs, avoid expensive vendor lock-in, and align my entire company on cloud spending: This playbook is simple, but you’d be surprised how much the basics can help transform your bottom line. Here’s my playbook: 1. Understand your workloads You need to know what workloads you’re running and whether they’re predictable or dynamic. - Predictable If you have workloads that don’t change a lot – as in, you can forecast cloud costs accurately — lock in volume discounts like reserved instances or savings plans. - Dynamic If you have no idea what the resource profile of certain workloads will look like, say you’re innovating, stick with on-demand capacity. You don’t want to risk overcommitting to enterprise discount pricing (EDP). For instance, if your actual spend is $70M but you commit to $250M, that’s a painful conversation with the CFO waiting to happen. 2. Stop running your engine overnight Instances running 24/7 without being used are a hidden cost killer. Implementing automated scheduling systems to power down these instances during periods of inactivity can significantly reduce costs. It’s like turning off your electric car overnight so you can drive it the next day without recharging. This may be straightforward. But at scale, this simple change can free up a significant budget. 3. Attached storage waste Storage utilization is often overlooked. One of our customers had a petabyte-sized S3 bucket costing $10k per month – yet no one knew what it was for. Right size your instances and audit storage usage regularly. Otherwise, you’re wasting resources like using a tank to kill a rat. 4. Make cost management a KPI Cloud cost visibility must be a company-wide priority – a top-level KPI so everyone knows they’re accountable. Focusing on this can lead to up to20% savings as people start paying attention to what’s being spent and why. Final thoughts: Cloud cost management is like fitness: every day counts. You won’t see the results immediately, but your expenses will balloon without consistent effort. Start today, focus on the basics, and watch your costs shrink over time. Pay now or pay later – the choice is yours.
-
If you’re in cloud and not looking at optimization end-to-end, you’re missing out — here are the key strategies you should know.. → Compute ↳ Right-size instances, use auto-scaling/serverless, and leverage spot/preemptible VMs ↳ Consolidate workloads with Kubernetes/Fargate/Cloud Run → Storage ↳ Use lifecycle policies to move infrequently used data to cheaper tiers ↳ Deduplication, compression, and smart replication strategies reduce costs → Networking ↳ CDN for static content, private networking to cut egress, and traffic shaping with load balancers ↳ Always optimize data transfer (avoid unnecessary cross-region costs) → Databases ↳ Use managed services, read replicas, and caching ↳ Shard/partition for scale, and pick the right DB for the workload → Big Data ↳ Spot clusters for jobs, serverless analytics, and data partitioning ↳ Stream only what’s critical, batch the rest → Security ↳ Enforce least privilege IAM, encrypt in transit/at rest ↳ Automate threat detection and centralize secrets with KMS/Vault → AI/ML ↳ Track experiments, use AutoML/pre-trained APIs ↳ Share GPUs, and clean/optimize data before training Essential Note: Cloud optimization isn’t a one-time exercise. You have to keep at it — especially now, with AI workloads driving cloud costs to new highs. Start with one area → measure impact → repeat. What other strategies would you add? • • • If you found this useful.. 🔔 Follow me (Vishakha) for more Cloud & DevOps insights ♻️ Share so others can learn as well!