Scientific Writing Best Practices

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Dawid Hanak
    Dawid Hanak Dawid Hanak is an Influencer

    Professor helping academics publish and build careers that make an impact beyond academia without sacrificing research time | Research Career Club Founder | Professor in Decarbonisation, Net Zero & Low-Carbon Consultant

    60,033 followers

    If your paper is getting rejected, it isn’t necessarily the science that’s the problem (it’s likely the journal fit that’s off!). Here’s how you can be be strategic about journal selection. How do I choose the right scientific journal? ↳ Analyze your citation list and target relevant publications. Can impact factor really determine journal quality? ↳ Look beyond numbers, focus on specialized audience fit. How to avoid predatory journal publication traps? ↳ Verify journal reputation before submitting your research. Will editors help improve my manuscript? ↳ Follow author guidelines meticulously. Navigating the academic publication landscape can feel like traversing a complex maze. As a professor, I've learned that selecting the right journal is both an art and a science. Here's a game-changing approach I've developed: 1. Conduct a citation audit: Count journals you've referenced most frequently. These are likely your ideal publication targets. 2. Beyond Impact Factor: Don't get fixated on numbers. A lower-ranked journal with a specialized audience might be more valuable than a high-impact generic publication. 3. Beware of predatory journals: If an unsolicited email promises quick publication for a fee, run! Legitimate open-access journals conduct rigorous peer review. 4. Craft a strategic cover letter: Suggest credible reviewers, highlight your paper's novelty, and demonstrate professionalism. 5. Patience is key: Most journals reject approximately 50% of submissions. Don't be discouraged - each submission is a learning opportunity. Pro tip: Always read and follow the journal's specific author guidelines. This shows you're a detail-oriented, professional researcher. Have you ever struggled with selecting the right scientific journal for your research? What challenges have you encountered? #science #scientist #ScientificCommunication #publishing #phd #professor #research #postgraduate

  • View profile for Vishal Chopra

    Data Analytics & Excel Reports | Leveraging Insights to Drive Business Growth | ☕Coffee Aficionado | TEDx Speaker | ⚽Arsenal FC Member | 🌍World Economic Forum Member | Enabling Smarter Decisions

    14,009 followers

    𝗪𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗜𝗦 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘀. After all, they’re “𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘢-𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘯,” right? But here’s the uncomfortable truth: 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗹 𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱... 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝘁𝗹𝘆, 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗹𝘆. ➡️ 𝘚𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘒𝘗𝘐s: Highlighting only the “feel-good” metrics while ignoring the ones that reveal cracks. ➡️ 𝘊𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘳𝘺-𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘴: A report may look stellar if you show Q2, but not so much if you include Q1. ➡️ 𝘏𝘪𝘥𝘥𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘪𝘷𝘰𝘵𝘛𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘴: A simple unchecked box can completely skew the story your data is telling. These aren’t just harmless quirks. They can 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆, leading to wrong calls. Whether it’s approving budgets, launching products, or restructuring teams. So, how do we keep reports honest? ✅ Cross-check KPIs against original objectives. ✅ Review multiple time horizons, not just the “best-looking” ones. ✅ Audit filters and slicers before presenting. ✅ Encourage a culture where bad news is not buried, but acted upon. Because at the end of the day, data doesn’t lie... but reporting can. The real question is: 𝘈𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘵𝘩? 👉 𝙃𝙤𝙬 𝙙𝙤 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙣𝙚𝙪𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙮 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝? #DataDrivenDecisionMaking #DataAnalytics #ExcelReports #DataTransparency #MISReporting

  • View profile for Josue Valles

    Founder, CurationLabs

    130,862 followers

    Found this 1980 ad about writing clearly. 65 years later, it's still the best writing advice I've ever seen: 1) Know exactly what you want to say before you start Most people start writing and figure it out as they go. That's why most writing sucks. Thompson says outline first, write second. Revolutionary concept, apparently. 2) Start where your readers are, not where you are Don't assume people know what you know. Meet them at their level of understanding, then bring them along. Most "experts" write for other experts and wonder why nobody gets it. 3) Use familiar word combinations Thompson's example: A scientist wrote "The biota exhibited a one hundred percent mortality response." Translation: "All the fish died." Stop trying to sound smart. Start trying to be clear. 4) Arrange your points logically Put the most important stuff first. Then the next most important. Then the least important. Seems obvious, but most people do it backwards. 5) Use "first-degree" words Thompson says some words bring immediate images to mind. Others need to be "translated" through first-degree words before you see them. "Precipitation" => "Rain" "Utilize" => "Use" "Facilitate" => "Help" 6) Cut the jargon Thompson warns against words and phrases "known only to people with specific knowledge or interests." If your mom wouldn't understand it, rewrite it. 7) Think like your reader, not like yourself Thompson asks: "Do they detract from clarity?" Most writers ask: "Do I sound professional?" Wrong question. TAKEAWAY: This ad is from 1960. The internet didn't exist. Social media wasn't even a concept. But the principles of clear communication haven't changed. Most people still can't write clearly because they're trying to impress instead of express.

  • View profile for Mel Loy SCMP

    Author | Speaker | Facilitator | Consultant (all things change and internal comms) | International Award Winner

    5,565 followers

    We’re talking to humans, not robots. Yet so often our communication seems to slip into ‘corporate robot’ territory. And that’s a problem because: - It’s boring - It’s meaningless - It doesn’t connect with your audience. So what should we do instead? - Think of the ‘BBQ chat’ - if you were explaining this topic to someone you’ve just met, for the first time, at a BBQ, how would you explain it? Ie, ditch the jargon, corporate speak, and gibberish. Just use plain, clear language. - Use empathy (genuinely) - AI can’t do this for you! So acknowledge feelings, personalise your message to the audience, allow for two-way communication, and think about your eye contact and body language. - Keep it simple - keeping it simple is not dumbing it down; it’s being smart because it’s how you reach as many people in your audience as possible. This means writing to the level of a 14-year-old (you’ll then reach 83% of your audience); keeping it short; and only sticking with what’s relevant. - Communicate from the audience’s perspective, not your’s (or the company’s) - think about the WIIFM Principle (what’s in it for me). Talk about what they care about, not what you care about. What else would you add to the list? [Image description: Image of Homer Simpson looking panicked as he tries to read a set of instructions that are covered in wet cement. The words above are a quote from the episode: "Le Grille?"]

  • View profile for Niki Clark, FPQP®

    Non-Boring Marketing for Advisory Firms

    9,042 followers

    No one is waking up at 7am, sipping coffee, thinking, “Wow, I really hope someone explains holistic wealth architecture today.” People want clarity. They want content that feels like a conversation, not a lecture. They want to understand what you’re saying the first time they read it. Write like you're talking to a real person. Not trying to win a Pulitzer. - Use short sentences. - Cut the jargon. - Sound like someone they’d trust with their money, not someone who spends weekends writing whitepapers for fun. Confused clients don’t ask for clarification. They move on. Here’s how to make your content clearer: 1. Ask yourself: Would my mom understand this? If the answer is “probably not,” simplify it until she would. No shade to your mom, she’s just a great clarity filter. 2. Use the “friend test.” Read it out loud. If it sounds weird or overly stiff, imagine explaining it to a friend at lunch. Rewrite it like that. 3. Replace jargon with real words. Say “retirement income you won’t outlive” instead of “longevity risk mitigation strategy.” Your clients are not Googling your vocabulary. 4. Stick to one idea per sentence. If your sentence is doing cartwheels and dragging a comma parade behind it, break it up. 5. Format like you actually want them to read it. Use line breaks. Add white space. Make it skimmable. No one wants to read a block of text the size of a mortgage document. Writing clearly isn’t dumbing it down. It’s respecting your audience enough to make content easy to understand. What’s the worst jargon-filled phrase you’ve seen in the wild? Let’s roast it.

  • View profile for Yulia Fedorenko
    Yulia Fedorenko Yulia Fedorenko is an Influencer

    Communications Officer @ UNHCR, UN Refugee Agency | Strategic Communicator | Helping important work be seen and understood

    13,060 followers

    I'm leading a lifelong battle against jargon and acronyms. Here's why. When you use references that not everyone understands, two things can happen: 🚩 Your audience gets lost in their thoughts, trying to recall what a term means. 🚩 They may reasonably conclude that your message isn't aimed at them. In both cases, you lose your audience. Here's how to avoid this: 🔷 Empathize with your audience: Identify who you're trying to reach and consider their knowledge level on the subject. 🔷 Stay focused on your goal: Remember, your aim is to inspire action, not to showcase everything you know. 🔷 Seek a fresh perspective: Have someone else review your draft. An “outsider” can help ensure that the message is clear. As the brilliant communicator Joanna Parsons says, simplifying language "doesn’t mean reducing the complexity of the ideas but rather adapting the way they’re expressed." Have I convinced you to join me in this battle against acronyms and jargon? Image credit: The New Yorker #Communications

  • View profile for Leslie Venetz

    Sales Trainer & SKO Speaker | USA Today Bestselling Author | Sales Strategist for Orgs That Outbound ✨ #EarnTheRight ✨ 2026 Goals: Read More Books & Pet More Dogs

    54,183 followers

    Stop telling on yourself by trying to use big fancy words and complicated explanations. Using big words to sound smart makes you sound less smart. Sales reps think using complex language makes them look professional. They throw around industry jargon and technical terms to prove they know their stuff. But research shows emails written at a third grade reading level get 36% higher response rates than emails with complex language. Your prospects aren't impressed by your vocabulary. They're scanning your email for 3 to 4 seconds trying to decide if it's worth their time. When they see complicated language, their brain registers it as extra work. Complex language creates barriers. It confuses prospects, makes your message harder to digest, and causes frustration. Clear, simple copy helps prospects quickly grasp your message. Clarity is what drives action. I personally aim to write emails at a fifth grade comprehension level. This isn't talking down to anyone. It means using clear language that's easy to understand, even if someone is skimming on their phone between meetings. Make your message so clear that prospects immediately understand the benefits you're offering and feel confident taking the next step. They respond because you made it easy for them to engage. Simple stands out in sales copywriting. 📌 What's one piece of jargon you need to cut from your outreach?

  • View profile for Narayanan S.

    Co-founder & CEO: Scriptbee | Unschool (YC W’21)

    18,094 followers

    I used to think using complex terminology demonstrated expertise. That "leveraging synergies" and "utilising frameworks" showed I belonged in business conversations. The reality? No one was impressed. They were just confused. 💡 The breakthrough came when I started writing exactly how I think not how I speak. This transformed my newsletter engagement (open rates jumped over 30%) Here's why writing how you think (not how you speak) works: 1. Authenticity cuts through noise - Your natural thought stands out in a sea of corporate-speak - Readers sense when you're being genuine vs. performing - Trust builds faster with authentic communication 2. Simplicity enables action - Clear instructions get implemented - Complex directions get abandoned - Young entrepreneurs especially value directness 3. Relatable language builds connection - Industry jargon creates outsiders - Conversational tone creates community - Speaking their language shows you understand their world 📊 In marketing specifically: - Conversational emails see 17% higher click-through rates - Simple language in sales pages increases conversion by 2.1x - Readability improvements can boost engagement by 58% ➡️ Your readers aren't stupid. They're busy. They want to understand your point in seconds, not decode your buzzword bingo. When writing for my newsletter, pitching to investors, or speaking to young entrepreneurs, I constantly remind myself: "If my 16-year-old self wouldn't understand it, it needs a rewrite." Clear writing shows clear thinking. So next time you write anything: If a shorter word works, use it If you wouldn't say it in casual conversation, don't write it If it sounds like a "business robot," start over Simple, isn't it?

  • View profile for Vinicius David
    Vinicius David Vinicius David is an Influencer

    I help companies grow and cut costs with AI Bestselling Author on AI and Leadership Former Executive at a Fortune 50 Company

    14,758 followers

    Tired of ChatGPT sounding like a keynote you never asked for? Most AI outputs still sound like this: “In today’s ever-evolving landscape, we must harness the power of…” Nobody talks like that in real life. Your writing shouldn’t either. So I built a “No Buzzword Mode” prompt. Paste it at the top of a chat and ChatGPT stops sounding like a corporate brochure and starts writing like a smart friend. Here’s the blacklist, grouped so your brain can skim it fast: Fake-epic words: harness, unleash, unlock, poised, new era, unprecedented, beacon Vague fluff: ever-evolving, paradigm, realm, landscape (as a metaphor), elevate, supercharge Story clichés: journey, embark, navigate, navigation, adventure, tapestry, architect You don’t need any of those to write clearly. The “No Buzzword Mode” prompt (to copy and paste): You are in NO BUZZWORD MODE. STYLE: - Write like a smart friend, not a corporate brochure. - Short sentences. Simple words. Clear examples. - No dramatic build-up. No fake inspiration. You are NOT allowed to use these words or phrases: Fake-epic words: - harness, unleash, unlock, poised, new era, unprecedented, beacon Vague fluff: - ever-evolving, paradigm, realm, landscape (as a metaphor), elevate, supercharge Story clichés: - journey, embark, navigate, navigation, adventure, tapestry, architect If you use ONE of them, you must immediately rewrite the sentence in plain English. GOAL: - Make everything easy to read on a phone. - Prioritize clarity over sounding impressive. Now, instead of: “We’re poised to harness the power of AI in a new era.” You get: “Here’s how to use AI today without overcomplicating it.” That’s what your readers actually want. Best use cases: → LinkedIn posts and comments → Emails and newsletters → Landing pages and sales pages → Internal docs, playbooks, SOPs Save this for later and drop one buzzword you’d happily ban forever.

  • View profile for Kawsalya Maharajan

    I Help PhD Scholars & Researchers with Thesis Writing, Proposals, and High-Impact Journal Publications | Academic Consultant | 700+ Successful Projects Delivered Efficiently

    11,099 followers

    Using Tenses in Academic Writing: A Quick Guide Choosing the correct tense is crucial for clarity and consistency in academic writing. Here’s a breakdown of how to use tenses across different sections of your paper: METHODOLOGY ↳ Present Passive: For general methods or standard procedures. Example: “The data is analyzed using statistical software.” ↳ Past Passive: For describing what was done in your study. Example: “The samples were collected from three different locations.” ABSTRACT ↳ Present Tense: To outline research gaps, objectives, and applications. Example: “This study aims to investigate the impact of climate change on agriculture.” ↳ Past Tense: To summarize methods and findings. Example: “Data was collected through surveys and analyzed using SPSS.” ↳ Past Perfect Tense: To highlight achievements. Example: “The team had successfully developed a new algorithm for data processing.” INTRODUCTION ↳ Present Tense: For established facts or previous research. Example: “Many studies indicate that artificial intelligence has transformed healthcare.” ↳ Past Tense: To describe previous experiments and their outcomes. Example: “Smith et al. (2020) found that this method improved efficiency by 30%.” ↳ Active Voice: To present your work or past research. Example: “We conducted a detailed analysis to identify key trends.” ↳ Passive Voice: For a formal tone. Example: “A thorough investigation was carried out to validate the hypothesis.” RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ↳ Present Tense: To describe tables, figures, or interpretations. Example: “Table 1 shows the correlation between variables.” ↳ Past Tense: To explain results. Example: “The results indicated a significant increase in efficiency.” ↳ Mixed Tenses: To summarize and interpret findings. Example: “The data showed a clear trend, which suggests that further research is needed.” CONCLUSION ↳ Past Tense: To summarize key results and significance. Example: “The study demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.” ↳ Future Tense: To suggest directions for future research. Example: “Future studies will focus on expanding the sample size.” 🔔Follow for more Dr.Kawsalya Maharajan Mastering tenses enhances the readability and professionalism of your academic writing. Need help in writing & publishing in your academic journey feel free to reach out #AcademicWriting #PhDHelp #ResearchTips #WritingSkills #Publishing

Explore categories