In a CULTURE of continuous feedback, people aren’t just "allowed" to give feedback; they’re actively encouraged to. It's where feedback isn’t reserved for formal reviews or the occasional meeting; it’s a natural part of daily work. A true CULTURE of continuous feedback means that: ✳️ People share ideas freely, knowing their thoughts are valued. ✳️ Teams regularly check in to discuss what’s going well and where things might need adjustment. ✳️ Leaders and managers seek feedback as much as they give it, showing that everyone’s input matters. ✳️ Constructive criticism is welcomed, and people see it as an opportunity to make things better, not as a judgment on them. If this all sounds very different to your existing culture- here's a few things you can try: ✔️ Set up Regular Check-Ins (Daily huddles, 1:1 coaching sessions and weekly meetings provide the necessary space for people to share their ideas, address challenges, and offer suggestions for improvement. ✔️ Create Feedback Channels: While direct feedback is a sign of a healthy feedback culture, there will always be people who don't like to speak up about how they feel so give people multiple ways to share feedback e.g. through suggestion boxes (physical or digital) or anonymous surveys. ✔️ Lead by Example: Simple- Ask for feedback on your own performance or decisions. If you struggle with this, you need a coach!! ✔️ Encourage Real-Time Feedback: Encourage people to give feedback in the moment rather than waiting for formal reviews or structured meetings. If someone spots an improvement opportunity during a task, they should feel free to speak up right then. ✔️ Recognize and Act on Feedback: Feedback culture only works if people see that their input leads to real change. Yesterday, we talked about recognizing the real experts—the people who do the work. In a feedback culture, this means actively listening to those insights and implementing changes based on what people who carry out the process are seeing and experiencing. They know better than anyone how things really work and where the bottlenecks lie. 💡 This culture isn't built overnight but it's entirely possible to build over time, once leaders are open to their own development and willing to make changes in their own behaviours first! #feedback #feedbackculture #leadership #continuousimprovement #lean #leanmanagement
Employee Surveys For Culture Insights
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
"Our workplace culture is amazing!" Says the CEO. Meanwhile… 👀 Employees are disengaging. 🤐 Conversations are happening in hushed tones. 🚪 Resignations land on desks without a warning. Because workplace culture isn’t what you SAY it is. It’s what your employees FEEL every day. Not the values on your website. Not the inspirational quotes on the wall. Not the free coffee or office perks. Culture is... 👂 The way leadership listens (or doesn’t). 💬 The truth behind closed-door conversations. 🚪 The quiet exits that no one questions, until it’s too late. Most leaders believe culture is a branding exercise. In reality, it’s a lived experience. So here’s something to sit with… If you weren’t in the room, what would your employees say about YOUR culture? And if you’re not sure, MotivateME: Transforming Corporate Health for Peak Performance can help. We start with an anonymous Work-Life Wellbeing Assessment to uncover the truth. We don’t guess. We listen. From that data, we build a Blueprint Report that reveals patterns, blind spots, and we work with your leadership team on how to fix them. We call this approach: You said. We did. Because a culture that listens, WINS. When people feel heard, they stay. They perform. They thrive. Are you ready to hear what your employees aren’t saying?
-
£11k to £25k. That’s how much it costs to replace an employee in the UK. Still relying on exit interviews? You’re already paying the price. By the time someone hands in their notice, the damage is done. And it’s costing you more than you think. High turnover is a talent problem, and a financial one. The best way to retain your people? Act before the resignation letter lands on your desk. At Plumm, I’ve seen firsthand how a proactive feedback culture transforms teams. It’s about listening before it’s too late, fostering trust, and showing employees they matter. Why proactive feedback matters? - Catch problems early Regular check-ins help spot issues before they escalate into costly resignations. - Foster growth People stay where they feel valued. Feedback should drive development, not just reviews. - Build trust Open conversations strengthen relationships, increasing retention. How to get it right? ↳ Make one-on-ones count Go beyond projects. Talk about goals, challenges, and aspirations. ↳ Open up feedback channels Surveys, digital tools, or just creating space to speak up. ↳ Celebrate wins Consistent recognition boosts morale and retention. ↳ Encourage two-way conversations Ask for feedback on leadership. It builds mutual respect. ↳ Act on feedback Nothing kills trust faster than ignored input. Show employees their voice matters. Exit interviews explain why someone left. Proactive feedback helps you keep them. High turnover is expensive. A feedback culture protects your bottom line and keeps your best people. PS: How are you making sure your employees feel heard?
-
I've helped teams build stronger communication cultures. (sharing my proven framework today) Building open communication isn't complex. But it requires dedication. Daily actions. Consistent follow-through. Here's my exact process for fostering feedback culture: 1. Start with weekly 30-min team check-ins → No agenda, just open dialogue → Everyone speaks, no exceptions → Celebrate small wins first 2. Implement "feedback Fridays" → 15-min 1:1 sessions → Both positive and constructive feedback → Action items for next week 3. Create anonymous feedback channels → Digital suggestion box → Monthly pulse surveys → Clear response timeline 4. Lead by example (non-negotiable) → Share your own mistakes → Ask for feedback publicly → Show how you implement changes 5. Set clear expectations → Document feedback guidelines → Train on giving/receiving feedback → Regular reminders and updates 6. Follow up consistently → Track feedback implementation → Share progress updates → Celebrate improvements 7. Make it safe (absolutely crucial) → Zero tolerance for retaliation → Protect confidentiality → Reward honest feedback Remember: Culture change takes time. Start small. Build trust. Stay consistent. I've seen teams transform in weeks using these steps. But you must commit fully. Hope this helps you build stronger team communication. (Share if you found value) P.S. Which step resonates most with you? Drop a number below. #team #communication #workplace #employees
-
Do you have a process in place to measure how well your new functionality is being embraced? The saying, "you get what you measure", holds especially true when it comes to change adoption in agile environments. One effective method is the Rose, Bud, Thorn technique, a tool borrowed from design thinking that's perfect for gathering feedback. At the end of a sprint, when new functionality is accepted and put into operation, launching a feedback survey is key. The Rose, Bud, Thorn method offers a simple yet powerful way to codify feedback: 🌹 Rose: Something positive that has gone well. 🌱 Bud: An aspect with potential that hasn't fully blossomed yet. 🌵 Thorn: A pain point or challenge that needs addressing. As an example, you would implement this by asking your stakeholders to capture their experiences on sticky notes and categorize them under Rose, Bud, or Thorn on a whiteboard. This feedback should be discussed during cross-functional team meetings with leadership and can serve as valuable input for sprint reviews or structured release feedback. Additionally, statement starters like "How might we...?" or "In what ways might we...?" can further channel feedback, offering a fresh perspective and helping to identify opportunities for improvement. Remember, involvement breeds commitment. Regular input and feedback collection should be embedded in your agile approach, influencing sprint cycle planning, future feature prioritization, and overall adoption. #ChangeManagement #ChangeLeadership #ChangeAdoption #Agile #ProjectManagement
-
Drawing from years of my experience designing surveys for my academic projects, clients, along with teaching research methods and Human-Computer Interaction, I've consolidated these insights into this comprehensive guideline. Introducing the Layered Survey Framework, designed to unlock richer, more actionable insights by respecting the nuances of human cognition. This framework (https://lnkd.in/enQCXXnb) re-imagines survey design as a therapeutic session: you don't start with profound truths, but gently guide the respondent through layers of their experience. This isn't just an analogy; it's a functional design model where each phase maps to a known stage of emotional readiness, mirroring how people naturally recall and articulate complex experiences. The journey begins by establishing context, grounding users in their specific experience with simple, memory-activating questions, recognizing that asking "why were you frustrated?" prematurely, without cognitive preparation, yields only vague or speculative responses. Next, the framework moves to surfacing emotions, gently probing feelings tied to those activated memories, tapping into emotional salience. Following that, it focuses on uncovering mental models, guiding users to interpret "what happened and why" and revealing their underlying assumptions. Only after this structured progression does it proceed to capturing actionable insights, where satisfaction ratings and prioritization tasks, asked at the right cognitive moment, yield data that's far more specific, grounded, and truly valuable. This holistic approach ensures you ask the right questions at the right cognitive moment, fundamentally transforming your ability to understand customer minds. Remember, even the most advanced analytics tools can't compensate for fundamentally misaligned questions. Ready to transform your survey design and unlock deeper customer understanding? Read the full guide here: https://lnkd.in/enQCXXnb #UXResearch #SurveyDesign #CognitivePsychology #CustomerInsights #UserExperience #DataQuality
-
"How to Craft Qualitative Research Questions 1. Purpose-Driven Ensures that questions align with the study’s objective and explore experiences deeply. 🔹 Example: If researching mental health in university students, a purpose-driven question might be: ➡️ "How do university students perceive the impact of academic pressure on their mental well-being?" (This aligns with the study’s purpose of understanding student experiences.) 2. Open-Ended Encourages in-depth responses, avoiding simple "yes" or "no" answers. 🔹 Example: Instead of asking: ❌ "Do you think social media affects self-esteem?" (Yes/No answer) ✅ Ask: "In what ways does social media influence your self-esteem?" (This allows participants to elaborate.) 3. Exploratory Focuses on understanding experiences, behaviors, and perceptions rather than measuring statistics. 🔹 Example: If studying remote work culture, an exploratory question might be: ➡️ "How do employees experience work-life balance while working remotely?" (This explores perceptions rather than giving a numerical result.) 4. Contextual Embeds the question within specific cultural or situational settings to gain deeper insights. 🔹 Example: If studying women’s empowerment in rural areas, a contextual question could be: ➡️ "How do cultural norms influence women's participation in entrepreneurship in rural Pakistan?" (This considers the specific cultural setting rather than generalizing.)
-
This paper shows that how employees perceive AI functions—not the AI technology itself—plays the biggest role in shaping workplace attitudes and behaviors. 1️⃣ AI is experienced in three ways: assistive (under employee control), augmented (enhances human ability), and autonomous (makes independent decisions). 2️⃣ Employee perceptions of these functions determine whether AI is seen as an opportunity (helpful, empowering) or a threat (job-replacing, devaluing). 3️⃣ These psychological appraisals directly impact whether employees feel motivated to learn about AI or experience job insecurity. 4️⃣ The same AI tool can be viewed differently by different employees—some may see it as helpful (assistive), while others feel replaced by it (autonomous), highlighting the importance of perception over technical capability. 5️⃣ Employees with higher AI self-efficacy (confidence in using AI) are less likely to feel threatened, especially by augmented and autonomous AI. 6️⃣ Through three studies, the paper confirms that subjective appraisal—not objective function—best predicts workplace outcomes like learning engagement and job anxiety. ✍🏻 Jieqiong Cao, Jingxian Yao, Shuhua Sun, Zhaoli Song, Fengzhi Zhang. Not all forms of artificial intelligence are perceived equal: AI functions and work outcomes. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100521
-
It’s that time of the year again when we (the HR team) gets excited about launching the annual employee engagement survey. I remember a time when I was sailing with same excitement, submitted the budget approvals and my CEO asked - Should we skip it this year? What’s really changed since last year? Did we move the needle at all? The harsh truth: while we all love a good engagement survey, a 70-page report rarely shifts what really matters. The real magic happens when we stop treating Employee Experience (EX) as just a report or an HR scorecard and start treating it like a business lever. In my 15 years from factory floors to real estate towers I have seen that great EX is built in daily decisions. What actually moved the needle? 1. Tieing EX to Business Outcomes - linking onboarding, promotions, exits to real KPIs like uptime, sales or safety. 2. Pulse the Moments that Matter - quick checks when people join, switch roles, navigate change. Identify the gaps before they snowballs. 3. Shared Ownership - Ops, IT, Finance must fix what they lead. Broken tools or vague processes ruin EX faster than any policy. 4. Show the Impact (Most Important) - connect EX to cost, revenue, customer trust. Speak the Board’s language. As HR leaders, the real fun is when we lift EX out of the survey cycle 🙂and embed it in how we manage people risk, productivity and growth every day. #EmployeeExperience #Culture
-
The Blind Spot in Employee Health: Why Measuring Only One Side of the Story Isn’t Enough Many companies today recognize the importance of employee well-being and are investing in programs to boost engagement, happiness, and holistic health. These are positive constructs, associated with job performance, innovation, and through that business performance. That’s good news. ❣️But here’s the blind spot: Our research found that employees can report high holistic health while simultaneously experiencing high burnout symptoms. (See here: https://lnkd.in/ehUNsqy9). This is counterintuitive for many leaders. Burnout symptoms (as we measured with the Burnout Assessment tool, or short BAT freely available here: https://lnkd.in/eiRD2wVU) are negatively correlated with e.g. engagement, happiness, and job satisfaction—but that doesn’t mean that employees with high holistic health automatically score low on burnout symptoms. 👉Why does this matter? Because companies that only measure positive sentiments like engagement and well-being are missing a critical piece of the puzzle (and an opportunity!). Links with performance are complex but we see a few nuances that matter. Burnout symptoms are expected to have a stronger link to costly business outcomes like attrition, sickness absence, presenteeism. On the other hand, positive constructs like holistic health and happiness are explected to be more strongly associated with positive business outcomes like retention, attraction, and innovation (as many other researchers also have pointed out). Both are associated with productivity but in different ways. Our 2023 data shows a similar pattern based on employee perceptions of outcomes reported. The reality for employees is though that the experience of either holistic health and burnout symptoms is dynamic and only half (in our study in 2023) reported positive scores on both Holistic Health and Burnout Symptoms simultaneously. ❗️If you’re not measuring burnout symptoms (and we would recommend using a properly validated instrument like for example BAT - which is not the same as a few questions about wellbeing), you’re operating with an incomplete picture of employee health experience — and potentially missing key warning signs that impact both people and performance. 👉The takeaway: Educate and empower yourself. To build a thriving, high-performing workforce, employers must measure both positive well-being indicators and burnout symptoms. Only then can they design truly effective interventions and create a workplace where employees don’t just survive, but thrive. Are you measuring both sides of employee health experience? McKinsey Health Institute World Economic Forum Wilmar Schaufeli Hans De Witte