Conflict Resolution Tips For Team Negotiations

Navigating Team Conflicts In team dynamics, some level of conflict is inevitable—even healthy. However, understanding the nature of the conflict can help leaders manage and resolve it more effectively. Here are four common conflict patterns and strategies for handling them: 1. The Solo Dissenter This conflict arises when one individual disagrees with the rest of the team. Whether due to personal differences or a challenge to the status quo, isolating or scapegoating this person is counterproductive. Instead, leaders should engage in one-on-one conversations to better understand their perspective and address any underlying concerns. Open communication can transform a dissenter into a valuable source of alternative viewpoints and broader system awareness. 2. The Boxing Match This frequent form of conflict involves a disagreement between two team members. If the issue stems from a personal relationship, external coaching may be helpful. However, if it’s task-related, the disagreement may benefit the team by introducing diverse ideas—provided the discussion remains civil. Leaders should avoid intervening prematurely, as genuine task-based disagreements often lead to more innovative solutions. 3. Warring Factions When two subgroups within the team oppose each other, an "us versus them" mentality can develop. This type of conflict is more complex, and solutions like voting or majority rule rarely resolve the issue. Leaders should introduce new options or third-way alternatives, encouraging both sides to broaden their thinking and find a compromise that addresses the core needs of both groups. 4. The Blame Game This challenging conflict involves the entire team, often triggered by poor performance. Assigning blame worsens the situation and creates more division. A more effective approach is to refocus the team on collective goals and explore strategies for improvement. Shifting the conversation from blame to team purpose and collective problem-solving can unite the group around a shared vision. By recognizing these conflict patterns and applying the right strategies, leaders can guide their teams through disagreements, fostering a more cohesive and productive environment.

Conflict is inevitable. How we manage it is both an art and a science. In my work with executives, I often discuss Thomas Kilmann's five types of conflict managers: (1) The Competitor – Focuses on winning, sometimes forgetting there’s another human on the other side. (2) The Avoider – Pretends conflict doesn’t exist, hoping it disappears (spoiler: it doesn’t). (3) The Compromiser – Splits the difference, often leaving both sides feeling like nobody really wins. (4) The Accommodator – Prioritizes relationships over their own needs, sometimes at their own expense. (5) The Collaborator – Works hard to find a win-win, but it takes effort. The style we use during conflict depends on how we manage the tension between empathy and assertiveness. (a) Assertiveness: The ability to express your needs, boundaries, and interests clearly and confidently. It’s standing your ground—without steamrolling others. Competitors do this naturally, sometimes too much. Avoiders and accommodators? Not so much. (b) Empathy: The ability to recognize and consider the other person’s perspective, emotions, and needs. It’s stepping into their shoes before taking a step forward. Accommodators thrive here, sometimes at their own expense. Competitors? They might need a reminder that the other side has feelings too. Balancing both is the key to successful negotiation. Here’s how: - Know your default mode. Are you more likely to fight, flee, or fold? Self-awareness is step one. - Swap 'but' for 'and' – “I hear your concerns, and I’d like to explore a solution that works for both of us.” This keeps both voices in the conversation. - Be clear, not combative. Assertiveness isn’t aggression; it’s clarity. Replace “You’re wrong” with “I see it differently—here’s why.” - Make space for emotions. Negotiations aren’t just about logic. Acknowledge emotions (yours and theirs) so they don’t hijack the conversation. - Negotiate the process, not just the outcome. If you’re dealing with a competitor, set ground rules upfront. If it’s an avoider, create a low-stakes way to engage. Great negotiators don’t just stick to their natural style—they adapt. Which conflict style do you tend to default to? And how do you balance empathy with assertiveness? #ConflictResolution #Negotiation #Leadership #Empathy #Assertiveness #Leadership #DecisionMaking

The fastest way to lose a high-stakes negotiation?   Letting emotions take the wheel (and no, I don’t mean theirs.)   - You’ve prepped for months. - The numbers are airtight. - The value proposition is flawless.     Then your counterpart’s voice tightens. Their gestures sharpen.   Suddenly, logic is drowning in a storm of frustration, ego, or outright anger.     Most negotiators panic here.   They either mirror the emotion (career-limiting) or freeze (deal-killing).     But elite leaders and dealmakers?   They ride the De-Escalator.   Here’s how to use this non-negotiable tactic when tensions explode in boardrooms, acquisitions, or thorny leadership conflicts:     Step 1: Become a Human Pressure Valve   When voices rise, lower yours. Speak slower. Softer.     Ask: “Help me understand exactly what’s happening here.”   Then let them vent.   Interruptions = gasoline on fire.     Most high-earners hate this part. (“Why should I let them rant?!”)    Because emotion is data.   Their outburst reveals what they truly value—and fear.     Step 2: Validate Without Surrender    Say: “I’d feel frustrated too in your position.” (Note: This isn’t agreement. It’s strategic empathy.)   NEVER say “calm down.”   Instead, reframe with “I” statements:     “I want to solve this, but I’m struggling with how heated this feels."   If you’re at fault?   Apologize once, crisply: “I regret that oversight.”   If not?   Distance gracefully: “I wasn’t involved in that piece, but let’s fix it.”   Step 3: Redirect to the Future (On Your Terms)   Weak negotiators beg for peace.   Elite negotiators trade emotion for action:    “When I faced a similar stalemate, we paused and…” “To move forward, here’s what we should…”    Key: Say “we,” not “you.”   Position yourself as their ally against the problem.     The Billion-Dollar Caveat:     Some people weaponize emotions.     A CEO client recently faced a shareholder who “raged” to force concessions.     Here's what he did:   “Let’s table this until we can regroup with clearer heads.”   The tantrum died and the deal survived.     So, here's what your next move should be:   If you negotiate with founders, investors, or C-suite teams, emotional collisions aren’t risks. They’re guarantees.   Master the De-Escalator.     Or keep losing deals (and respect) to people who do.     P.S. Struggling with a recurring negotiation nightmare? DM me “De-Escalator" for a free 15-minute audit of your toughest sticking point.    PPS. My 1:1 clients pay $25k+ to embed these frameworks. You just got the blueprint for free. (But the discipline to execute it? That’s on you.)    Repost to save a leader from self-sabotage.   ----------------- Hi, I’m Scott Harrison and I help executive and leaders master negotiation & communication in high-pressure, high-stakes situations. - ICF Coach and EQ-i Practitioner - 24 yrs | 19 countries | 150+ clients  - Negotiation | Conflict resolution | Closing deals

If there's conflict in your team, how can you resolve it without aggression or escalation? And also without people-pleasing or giving away your power as a leader? The key here is: establish psychological safety. If your first response is to blame them, their guards will go up, and they will get defensive, because they will detect a threat i.e., lack of psychological safety. That's the end of the conversation and maybe even the relationship in extreme cases. Here are some examples: What NOT to Do: Dismiss or Ignore Concerns: Example: A team member raises an issue during a meeting, but it's brushed aside by the team leader without any further discussion. Instead: Acknowledge the concern and encourage open dialogue to understand its root cause and potential impact. What NOT to Do: Blame or Shame Individuals: Example: When a mistake is made, publicly assigning blame to a specific team member. Instead: Approach errors as learning opportunities for the entire team, focusing on solutions rather than assigning fault. Give constructive feedback in private. What NOT to Do: Dominate Discussions: Example: A few outspoken team members monopolize discussions, making it difficult for others to contribute their perspectives. Instead: Facilitate balanced participation by actively encouraging quieter team members to share their thoughts and ensuring everyone has an opportunity to speak. What TO Do Instead: Encourage Open Communication: Example: Create regular opportunities for team members to share their thoughts, concerns, and feedback in a safe and non-judgmental environment, such as through regular team meetings or anonymous suggestion boxes. Model Vulnerability: Example: Leaders openly admit their own mistakes or uncertainties, demonstrating that it's acceptable to be imperfect and fostering a culture of trust and authenticity. Provide Constructive Feedback: Example: When addressing performance issues, focus on specific behaviours or outcomes rather than attacking the individual's character. Offer guidance on how to improve and support them in their development. Celebrate Diversity of Thought: Example: Encourage team members to bring diverse perspectives to the table, recognizing that differing viewpoints can lead to more robust solutions. Celebrate successes that result from collaborative efforts. Establish Clear Norms: Example: Set explicit ground rules for communication and conflict resolution within the team, emphasizing the importance of respect, active listening, and maintaining confidentiality. Did this help? Then give this post a 👍🏼

𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 Conflict in the workplace is inevitable. But the way you handle it can make or break team dynamics. → Many leaders struggle to resolve conflicts. → They react defensively. → They prioritize being right over finding solutions. This approach often exacerbates issues and erodes trust. But there’s a powerful tool that’s often overlooked: Humility. Wondering why humility is so effective in conflict resolution? Here’s why: → It fosters open communication. → It builds trust and respect. → It shifts focus from blame to understanding. Here’s how you can use humility to enhance conflict resolution: 1️⃣ 𝗟𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆: → Humble leaders truly listen. → They seek to understand, not just respond. → This approach makes team members feel heard and valued. 2️⃣ 𝗔𝗰𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀: → Everyone makes mistakes, including leaders. → Admitting your errors shows you’re human and approachable. → It encourages others to be honest and open about their own mistakes. 3️⃣ 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳: → Humble leaders put the team’s needs first. → They focus on finding solutions that benefit everyone, not just themselves. → This mindset fosters collaboration and mutual respect. 4️⃣ 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗻 𝗢𝗽𝗲𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗱: → Assume you don’t have all the answers. → Be willing to consider other perspectives and ideas. → This openness can lead to creative solutions and stronger team bonds. 5️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀: → Speak kindly, even during disagreements. → Show respect for different viewpoints. → This creates a safe environment where everyone feels comfortable contributing. 6️⃣ 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘂𝗲: → Encourage team members to share their thoughts. → Guide discussions toward understanding and resolution. → This helps to diffuse tension and build consensus. 7️⃣ 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗹𝘆: → After conflicts are resolved, take time to reflect on what you learned. → Use these insights to improve your conflict resolution skills. → This continuous learning helps you grow as a leader and strengthens your team. Using humility doesn’t mean being weak or indecisive. It’s about showing strength through understanding, patience, and the willingness to grow. In a world where leadership is often equated with authority and control, embracing humility sets you apart. It creates a foundation of trust, respect, and collaboration, leading to a more cohesive and productive team. Ready to embrace humility in your leadership approach? Start by listening, acknowledging, and valuing your team’s contributions. #Leadership #ConflictResolution #Humility #TeamBuilding #EffectiveCommunication #Respect

Conflict kills growth. It blocks momentum. It weakens trust. It turns teams into silos. Because: 1. It drains your energy. - This is your burnout. 2. It breaks relationships. - This is your disconnection. 3. It delays career moves. - This is your missed chance. But: Conflict isn’t the enemy. Avoidance is. Silence is. Ego is. It is not a race. Nor a battle. You need to talk through conflict... Like you're trying to solve it... Not win it. Every argument hides a hidden door: - To clarity. - To connection. - To real leadership. But only if you learn to walk through it. 8 Ways to turn Conflict into Growth: 1. Build the Team - Say: “Let’s handle this side by side.” - Focus on solving, not blaming. - Create a sense of “us” instead of “me vs. you.” 2. Be open to their Perspective - Ask: “Can you walk me through how you see this?” - Listen without preparing your response. - Let their view expand your own. 3. Look for Clarity - Ask: “What outcome are we really aiming for?” - Zoom out to see the bigger picture. - Cut through the noise to find the real issue. 4. Build the Trust - Say: “I hear you. What do you need right now?” - Show up with care, not just solutions. - Make them feel safe, not judged. 5. Explore new Approaches - Ask: “What’s another way to tackle this?” - Flip the script and explore the edges. - Break out of the usual loop. 6. Find Common Ground - Say: “Where do we both agree?” - Start from what connects you. - Use agreement as a launchpad. 7. Listen to Understand - Reflect back: “Sounds like you feel - is that it?” - Slow down your replies. - Show that you’re really with them. 8. Create the Solution Together - Say: “What’s one step we can take together?” - Move forward as partners. - Turn friction into shared ownership. Your words build the climate. Your tone decides the outcome. And your curiosity opens the door. You don’t need to win every battle. You just need to stop starting wars. Conflict doesn’t end relationships. Disconnection does. Reconnect with intention. That’s how leaders rise. --- P.S. – This image is copyrighted. Please ask for permission before using it. Repost ♻️ if you find this useful. Hit the 🔔 if you enjoy my content

Dan and Todd? They used to be best friends. But things got messy, and now they can't stand each other. Dan's ready to move on, but Todd? Not so much. Problem is, they work on the same team you manage, and now Dan's knocking on your door, hoping you'll step in and fix things. Sure, you could tell them, "Just avoid each other and carry on." Sounds easy, right? Why make two people who aren't friends anymore work together if they don't want to? But here's the catch: avoiding this issue might be an easy short-term fix, but it's not a long-term solution that actually works. In most workplaces, people can't just steer clear of each other, especially if they need to interact on the daily. So instead of hoping it all blows over, try these steps to get Dan and Todd back on the same page professionally—even if the friendship ship has sailed. Step 1: Acknowledge the drama, privately. Don't cross your fingers and hope they'll magically "work it out." Have a quick, private chat with each of them to figure out what's going on. Listening to them (without playing favorites) shows them you're taking this seriously. Step 2: Shift the focus to work goals. The end game? You want them thinking about work, not their personal beef. Remind them that the team has goals, and their collaboration matters for everyone's success (including their own). Step 3: Set some ground rules. Lay down clear expectations for communication, respect, and behavior. They don't have to be besties, but they do need to keep it professional and act with respect. That way, everyone's on the same page. Step 4: If it's still tense, bring in a mediator. Sometimes a neutral third party can get things out in the open, defuse the tension, and help them both refocus on moving forward. Step 5: Keep an eye on things. Conflict resolution is never a "one and done." Check in now and then to make sure they're meeting expectations and catching any new issues early. Bonus step: Document everything. Keep records of your conversations and any actions taken. If Todd's behavior begins to impact the team or work quality, documentation will support any future action you might need to take. Bottom line: Telling them to avoid each other sounds easy, but it's not sustainable. By helping them work through this professionally, you're building a culture of respect and collaboration—and a stronger team all around.

How to Facilitate Conflict Resolution Sessions as a Chief of Staff A conflict resolution session works best when the environment is calm, the purpose is clear, and the conversation moves at a steady pace. The Chief of Staff role is uniquely positioned to create those conditions. Here are practical steps that can be tailored to most any situation: 1. Set the stage before the meeting • Share the purpose of the session with everyone involved. • Outline what the conversation will cover and what it will not. • Establish expectations for tone, participation, and confidentiality. • Ensure each person feels prepared, not surprised. 2. Begin with grounding to get everyone on the same page • Open with the shared goal or the outcome the group is working toward. • Acknowledge the tension without assigning blame. • Invite each person to speak briefly about what they hope to resolve. 3. Allow space and time for each perspective • Give each participant uninterrupted time to share their view. • Listen for patterns, assumptions, and emotional cues. • Reflect back what you hear to confirm understanding. • Keep the pace slow enough for people to think, not only react, etc 4. Identify the core issue together • Surface the root cause behind the tension. • Clarify where expectations diverged or communication broke down. • Ensure everyone agrees on the problem before moving to solutions. 5. Guide the group toward shared outcomes • Shift the conversation toward what needs to happen next. • Ask grounding questions that move the group forward. • Encourage solutions that support the team, the work, and the broader organization. 6. Align on commitments • Capture the actions each person will take. • Confirm timelines, owners, and follow‑up points. • Make sure commitments feel realistic and mutually supported. 7. Close with steadiness • Summarize what was resolved and what comes next. • Reinforce the shared goal and the progress made. • Thank participants for engaging with respect and intention. 8. Follow up after the session • Check in with each person individually. • Monitor how the commitments are progressing. • Reinforce agreements and keep the environment stable. All of these things contribute to a healthy and respectful company culture. And they also teach people to practice healthy conflict resolution on their own without the need for a facilitator. In fact, I recommend hosting a conflict resolution training and hosting mock sessions to develop people’s ability to manage conflict appropriately.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸, 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲-𝗮𝗴𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗶𝘀 𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲, but it’s inevitable. Yet, many don't know how to handle it effectively. Once I got curious about what causes conflict, I realized most are rooted on 3 sources: 𝟭. 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗔𝘀𝘆𝗺𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗿𝘆: Conflict often happens when parties lack access to the same data. Their decisions clash because they’re not working with the same information. At Google Home, the e-commerce team and I didn't see eye to eye on a new service launch strategy. The economics impacted their channel performance, but after I shared the roadmap of future services that would offset the challenges, we aligned. With both teams accessing the same "data set", the conflict dissolved.     𝟮. 𝗣𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀: Sometimes, everyone has the same facts but different priorities. One side might focus on quality vs. speed. Having a common set of principles or philosophies helps drive alignment.     While leading the transition from G Suite to Google Workspace, we restructured features across 20+ apps. Each app team had different approaches, making alignment difficult. But once we agreed on principles—like target customers profiles per subscription tier—decision-making became much easier.     𝟯. 𝗘𝗴𝗼: Sometimes it's not about data or principles— it's personal. A party may feel slighted or passed over, leading them to derail plans (consciously or unconsciously). In such cases, escalation is often the best solution.     At Adobe, I worked to align product leaders on a strategy, but some personal grievances and turf wars slowed progress. Even with shared data and principles, the conflict persisted. Escalating to senior management helped resolve the impasse and get everyone on board. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲’𝘀 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗹𝗶𝗰𝘁: 𝟭. 𝗦𝗲𝗲𝗸 𝘁𝗼 𝗨𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱: Identify the root cause: data gap, philosophical difference, or ego? Approach with empathy, curiosity, and zero judgment. 𝟮. 𝗔𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀: Share all relevant info. Ensure both sides work from the same set of truths. 𝟯. 𝗔𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀: Once aligned on facts, agree on guiding principles. Debate principles, not the issue itself. 𝟰. 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀𝗵𝗼𝗽 𝗦𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: Collaborate on options, weighing pros and cons together. 𝟱. 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁: Choose a solution, document it, and share with all involved. Include names and dates—this adds accountability and prevents reopening the issue. 𝟲. 𝗘𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗶𝗳 𝗡𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆: If all else fails, it's likely ego-driven and escalation might be necessary—and that’s okay when done responsibly. Next time conflict arises, don’t rush to fix it or let frustration take over. Step back, identify the cause, and handle it methodically. #leadership #conflict

In the last major internal conflict I had, I stopped and thought: am I the first one to live this?! Hostility. Threats. Ah, and I was in the car on the way back from the hospital from giving birth. Nice welcome back 😂 Managers spend up to 40% of their time handling conflicts. This time drain highlights a critical business challenge. Yet when managed effectively, conflict becomes a catalyst for: ✅ Innovation ✅ Better decision-making ✅ Stronger relationships Here's the outcomes of my research. No: I wasn't the first one going through this ;) 3 Research-Backed Conflict Resolution Models: 1. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Model (TKI) Each style has its place in your conflict toolkit: - Competing → Crisis situations needing quick decisions - Collaborating → Complex problems requiring buy-in - Compromising → Temporary fixes under time pressure - Avoiding → Minor issues that will resolve naturally - Accommodating → When harmony matters more than the outcome 2. Harvard Negotiation Project's BATNA Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement - Know your walkaway position - Research all parties' alternatives - Strengthen your options - Negotiate from confidence, not fear 3. Circle of Conflict Model (Moore) Identify the root cause to choose your approach: - Value Conflicts → Find superordinate goals - Relationship Issues → Focus on communication - Data Conflicts → Agree on facts first - Structural Problems → Address system issues - Interest Conflicts → Look for mutual gains Pro Tips for Implementation: ⚡ Before the Conflict: - Map stakeholders - Document facts - Prepare your BATNA - Choose your timing ⚡ During Resolution: - Stay solution-focused - Use neutral language - Listen actively - Take reflection breaks ⚡ After Agreement: - Document decisions - Set review dates - Monitor progress - Acknowledge improvements Remember: Your conflict style should match the situation, not your comfort zone. Feels weird to send that follow up email. But do it: it's actually really crucial. And refrain yourself from putting a few bitter words here and there ;) You'll come out of it a stronger manager. As the saying goes "don't waste a good crisis"! 💡 What's your go-to conflict resolution approach? Has it evolved with experience? ♻️ Share this to empower a leader ➕ Follow Helene Guillaume Pabis for more ✉️ Newsletter: https://lnkd.in/dy3wzu9A